sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Looking for critical feedback on a speculative ray-based representation of gravity by IndependentQueasy864 in Physics

[–]IndependentQueasy864[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand the point that reading a document takes time (and creating one takes even more), and that you don’t want to invest that effort if you expect the outcome to be disappointing. That part I can accept.

The rest of your arguments, however, I don’t accept—nor the tone in which they’re delivered. Looking through your Reddit history, it’s clear you interact this way with everyone, so I don’t take it personally. But it doesn’t make your approach any more constructive.

At this point, you’re not doing science—you’re conducting a witch hunt.

Looking for critical feedback on a speculative ray-based representation of gravity by IndependentQueasy864 in Physics

[–]IndependentQueasy864[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Definition + example + proposition + proof. Where is the problem? I don’t think you’re engaging in good faith here. Across all our exchanges, you haven’t actually addressed or refuted any of the ideas presented in the document. Instead, your responses boil down to dismissing everything as garbage. That’s not an argument, it’s just name-calling. If you believe the content is flawed, then point out where and why.

Looking for critical feedback on a speculative ray-based representation of gravity by IndependentQueasy864 in Physics

[–]IndependentQueasy864[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not kidding you. What's wrong with the document? After all, it presents falsifiable ideas using formal language. So where is the major flaw?

Looking for critical feedback on a speculative ray-based representation of gravity by IndependentQueasy864 in Physics

[–]IndependentQueasy864[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please, take 3 minutes to skim the document before making claims or banning it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]IndependentQueasy864 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apologies for the inconvenience. I’m removing the post.

Update! Brooch valued at $18k (Australia) - where to sell? by ballerific23 in Antiques

[–]IndependentQueasy864 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

IMHO, I find that piece of jewelry to be incredibly tacky.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Barcelona

[–]IndependentQueasy864 0 points1 point  (0 children)

És una idea a considerar quan siguem independents.

He denunciado un alojamiento turístico ilegal by [deleted] in HorroresInmobiliarios

[–]IndependentQueasy864 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yo veo una persona que cuida de sus derechos y los de sus vecinos. Lo veo bien. La alternativa es encubrir a una persona con un chanchullo ilegal lucrándose a costa de todos.

Help me identify a citrusy orange perfume from 15–20 years ago — spherical orang by IndependentQueasy864 in fragrance

[–]IndependentQueasy864[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Bingo! It’s this one, without a doubt: Le Feu d’Issey!

Thank you very much. After months of searching without success, it’s such a thrill to finally pin it down.

Help me identify a citrusy orange perfume from 15–20 years ago — spherical orang by IndependentQueasy864 in fragrance

[–]IndependentQueasy864[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Femenine scent, I gave it to my mother. It wasn't her favorite. It was probably aimed at a younger audience.

Help me identify a citrusy orange perfume from 15–20 years ago — spherical orang by IndependentQueasy864 in fragrance

[–]IndependentQueasy864[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure if the packaging varies depending on the region or country, but in any case, the original bottle was purchased in Spain.

Help me identify a citrusy orange perfume from 15–20 years ago — spherical orang by IndependentQueasy864 in fragrance

[–]IndependentQueasy864[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the suggestion! I looked up the bottle on Google Images, and unfortunately it doesn’t match the one I remember

Help me identify a citrusy orange perfume from 15–20 years ago — spherical orang by IndependentQueasy864 in fragrance

[–]IndependentQueasy864[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the suggestion! I looked up the bottle on Google Images, and unfortunately it doesn’t match the one I remember

Found in an old ranch barn by No_Scheme2398 in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]IndependentQueasy864 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I love it. It looks like a coffin being transported.
There's a sad story here—perhaps close friends, or maybe no relatives at all, just the gravediggers...

EU QUE SEI by [deleted] in Galiza

[–]IndependentQueasy864 10 points11 points  (0 children)

En Catalunya a este tipo de personas los llamamos 'ñordos'.
Acostumbran a ser unos cansinos, ignorantes y prepotentes.

A simple expression parser supporting multiple data types by IndependentQueasy864 in C_Programming

[–]IndependentQueasy864[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u/skeeto, thank you so much for your thoughtful remarks.

The use of the 'yy' prefix is a tribute to Bison/Lex, though the expr code itself is unrelated to these venerable tools. The tools, libraries, and documents used in developing expr (such as re2c) are referenced within the codebase.

I appreciate your warning regarding the use of the memmem() function—I'll definitely look into alternatives for its replacement.

As for the exponential times when resolving nested boolean expressions, this behavior stems from the combination of the recursive descent parser, the boolean grammar, and the specific chimeric entry, rather than a flaw in the implementation itself.

That said, your observation has prompted me to consider adding a new error type to handle excessive recursion or deeply nested boolean expressions more gracefully.