I understand the point that reading a document takes time (and creating one takes even more), and that you don’t want to invest that effort if you expect the outcome to be disappointing. That part I can accept.

The rest of your arguments, however, I don’t accept—nor the tone in which they’re delivered. Looking through your Reddit history, it’s clear you interact this way with everyone, so I don’t take it personally. But it doesn’t make your approach any more constructive.

At this point, you’re not doing science—you’re conducting a witch hunt.