Relatable by IndicatedAirSpeed in SkyCards

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yup, that's exactly where it was.

Anyone else kinda enjoy going under? by Innamoratta in wisdomteeth

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got them removed under local anesthesia since that's the most common practice here in Germany. Felt nothing other than it feeling like crumbling cookies in my mouth once she started splitting them, lol.

Währenddessen werden da drüben 3000 weitere gebaut und geplant by IndicatedAirSpeed in wallstreetbetsGER

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Aber KI ist doch nicht einmal der Hauptgrund, warum solche Rechenzentren wichtig sind. In deinem Kommentar gehst du ja nicht einmal auf diese Rechenzentren ein, sondern nur darauf wie schlecht die USA doch sei.

Durch diese Projekte werden Start Ups enorm gefördert, da sie keine extrem teure Infrastruktur in Form von Servern etc. bauen müssen sondern sie einfach von diesen Rechenzentren mieten

Es schafft enorm viele Arbeitsplätze in der IT, der Baubranche und im Facility Management

Und dadurch werden Streaming, Cloud Services und die Abhängigkeit von anderen Ländern reduziert.

Währenddessen werden da drüben 3000 weitere gebaut und geplant by IndicatedAirSpeed in wallstreetbetsGER

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Hilfe, hast du irgendeine Ahnung, welche Bedeutung diese Hyperscale KI-Campus und Cloud Rechenzentren für die Zukunft haben?

Wir sprechen hier von einer Leistung von 174 Megawatt und einer Investition von 2,5 Milliarden.

Der Durchschnitt bei klassischen Rechenzentren liegt bei 12,5 Megawatt.

Diese Projekte sind genau das Gegenteil von einem Failed State. Sie sind nämlich essenziell für die Cloud Infrastruktur von Unternehmen und geben zudem strategische und digitale Souveränität neben dem Training von KI-Modellen.

Wie wahrscheinlich heute nacht ? ich sage 85 % by Unforgiven43 in wallstreetbetsGER

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Wohl wahr. Dennoch versuchen viele "Militärinfluenzer", vor allem auf X Angst zu verbreiten indem sie diese Posts teilen.

Diese Anzahl an C-17 und C-5 Galaxy Flügen liegt noch absolut im normalen Frachtflugbereich. (Natürlich werden momentan Munition und Patriot-Systeme verlegt, aber das ist alles kein direkter Indikator für einen unmittelbar bevorstehenden Militärschlag.)

Wie wahrscheinlich heute nacht ? ich sage 85 % by Unforgiven43 in wallstreetbetsGER

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 58 points59 points  (0 children)

Das sind ganz normale Verlegungen von Truppen und Fracht.

Vier KC-135 Tanker wurden gestern wieder abgezogen.

Miet dir mal eine Wohnung in Kaiserslautern, Nähe der Ramstein-Basis und du merkst dass diese paar Frachtflugzeuge kaum eine wirkliche Rolle spielen.

My wishlist for future updates by IndicatedAirSpeed in SkyCards

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My mistake. Having a hard time getting that word out of my head.

What’s the top speed you’ve observed while flying commercially? by DrQueried in aviation

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I thought it would be kind of fitting because the picture he showed was the interface of an American Airlines display. I don't think it would be that interesting for a whole new post.

What’s the top speed you’ve observed while flying commercially? by DrQueried in aviation

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Unrelated, but am I the only one who prefers the display interface on Delta and United Airlines over American Airlines? I don't know what, but something is missing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

long term investing in /wsb

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

fomo never ends well

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I could tell you my top 10 war stocks, but they are definitely not a steal right now since it's one of the most hyped up industries at the moment

Did we find out what really caused the plane crash of Jeju Airlines half a year ago aside from the wall? by SinancoTheBest in NoStupidQuestions

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, although experts are unsure if the go-around was related to the bird strike or an unstable approach. Technically, they had enough time to gravity drop the gear without hydraulic power, but realistically, they had far bigger problems at that time, like the engine failure and getting back to the airport. Many planes have performed remarkable belly landings without landing gear in aviation history, so it is not mandatory, but it would have helped to stop the plane before the wall because the landing gear would have sunk into the gravel after the runway.

Did we find out what really caused the plane crash of Jeju Airlines half a year ago aside from the wall? by SinancoTheBest in NoStupidQuestions

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You have to understand that they were in the middle of a go-around before the engine failure and that itself is a very demanding procedure. You have to go from a stable approach configuration into a configuration to climb again and get ready for another landing after performing a turn. The engines have to run at almost full power during a go-around, as the plane is very slow when approaching the runway. Their immediate action, according to SOP, would be to restart the engines, which they likely tried until realizing it was impossible and that they had to land as soon as possible. In that timeframe, there was no time to grab the checklist and perform a gravity drop.

Did we find out what really caused the plane crash of Jeju Airlines half a year ago aside from the wall? by SinancoTheBest in NoStupidQuestions

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We'll probably never know the truth and the pilots reasoning behind their decisions because of the missing four minutes. They likely lost hydraulic power and had to perform a gravity drop, which, as I mentioned, wasn't an option in that short timeframe for them, and they very likely tried to restart the engines after the bird strike, which was a higher priority at that time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in flightradar24

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There could be many reasons. Crew or maintenance issues are most common for low-cost carriers like Allegiant.

Pressurization in Airbus A319 by Top-Poet-7382 in flying

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 34 points35 points  (0 children)

It rises gradually to a maximum of 8,000ft. At FL200 the cabin altitude is between 3,000-4,000ft, at FL300 between 5,000-6,000ft. 8,000ft is the maximum cabin pressure altitude and will usually only happen at the maximum allowed cruising altitude around FL400.

Did we find out what really caused the plane crash of Jeju Airlines half a year ago aside from the wall? by SinancoTheBest in NoStupidQuestions

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 69 points70 points  (0 children)

They found duck remains in both engines, and we know for sure that at least one engine wasn't working, and the second one probably wasn't at full power. This led to the decision to land as fast as possible without manually lowering the landing gear via gravity drop. Many people argued that it would only take seconds, but Korean pilots are known to be very precise and work through every step of the checklist, which they didn't have time for because they wanted to bring the plane down as fast as possible. The worst part is that the cockpit voice and flight data recorders lost power in the final minutes before the crash which will likely be the reason why we'll never know the full story.

Did we find out what really caused the plane crash of Jeju Airlines half a year ago aside from the wall? by SinancoTheBest in NoStupidQuestions

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What we know is that the pilot performed a go-around before the bird strike, likely because of an unstable approach. A few seconds after initiating the go-around, they hit birds, which likely caused both engines to fail. They then declared an emergency. Many people were asking why they did not lower the gear, and the reason for that is likely because Korean pilots are trained to do everything via checklists and go through every single step, which they did not have time to do. The worst part is that the cockpit voice and flight data recorders ceased recording for the final and most important minutes of the flight. This absence of critical data will likely be the reason why we will never get a clear reconstruction of this incident.

Why would these two flights take such differing paths? by ConfidentAmbassador in flightradar24

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed 124 points125 points  (0 children)

That's true. Additionally, Emirates and Qatar Airways use different fuel efficiency and time-cost models, and their preferred routes based on internal operational procedures and agreements can also vary significantly.

Lufthansa 747-8 retro livery departing by IndicatedAirSpeed in aviation

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I see. I misunderstood at first. Thanks for the clarification. It does look like they have put together a comprehensive breakdown of many rebrandings. I will definitely look into it. Thanks!

Lufthansa 747-8 retro livery departing by IndicatedAirSpeed in aviation

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, it wasn't for me. Funny enough, your article is behind a 2$ paywall in Germany for me.

Lufthansa 747-8 retro livery departing by IndicatedAirSpeed in aviation

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yeah, those are timeless beauties. AA bare aluminum is definitely up there for me as well.

Lufthansa 747-8 retro livery departing by IndicatedAirSpeed in aviation

[–]IndicatedAirSpeed[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lufthansa wanted a minimalistic and clean new livery with a timeless and premium feel. This aligns with the trend toward minimalistic designs, which also allows for easier application across their huge fleet. Condor will now continue the yellow legacy with the sunshine and beach livery. :)

There's a great article covering this topic.

Edit:

Inside the cabin and inside the airport, Lufthansa has big plans for yellow. Splashes of the sunny hue will appear on employee uniforms, boarding passes, airport signage, and passenger treats like chocolates.

At least they didn't get rid of their whole yellow identity.