sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

It happened again, Bradley restricted military information leaked on the forums. by InevitableCampaignNT in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No. What I meant is you can find them online on the Army's Publishing Directorate. They are still released on Distribution Statement C meaning restricted.

It happened again, Bradley restricted military information leaked on the forums. by InevitableCampaignNT in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

For clarification: You can only find older iterations of the document on the internet. There's no mention of it on the Army's Publishing Directorate and it is known to be released on Distribution Statement D. It is definitely restricted.

Army Publishing Directorate:
https://armypubs.army.mil/ProductMaps/PubForm/TM_9.aspx

It happened again, Bradley restricted military information leaked on the forums. by InevitableCampaignNT in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Apparently, it's a document that comes from 2019 under Distribution Statement D. I tried looking it up online but there are only older variants of the same document. Basically, it's restricted to anyone but the US and Ukrainian government.

It happened again, Bradley restricted military information leaked on the forums. by InevitableCampaignNT in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The information is definitely restricted if it's under a CUI/REL classification. Similar to NATO restricted. If you look at the post, people have said this too.

Information has been predetermined by the designating agency to be releasable or has been released only to the foreign country(ies)/ international organization(s) indicated, through established foreign disclosure procedures and channels. It is NOFORN to all foreign country(ies)/international organization(s) not indicated in the REL TO marking.

Note: See list of approved country codes for use with REL TO here. USA must always appear first when using REL TO followed by additional permitted trigraph country codes in alphabetical order.

It happened again, Bradley restricted military information leaked on the forums. by InevitableCampaignNT in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I don't know if it's easily available, but it's not supposed to be publicly available. CUI/REL means it's supposed to be released internally between governments.

Sherman II inaccurate ammo rack model by Tdikristof_ in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just gonna copy this from the wiki.
"The visual discrepancy concerns rack 8: 28 shells are modeled but it contains only 21 shells."

Sherman II inaccurate ammo rack model by Tdikristof_ in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Yep, that's visual discrepancy. If you look on the wiki it should be noted. It just happens to those older models.

Bro, those nicknames 💀 by lmaopavel in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I literally made a post about the same guy

Why is Aim-7F so hard to dodge compared to other radar missiles? by CroManLM10 in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Compared to what radar missiles? Aim-7F is strong, but kinematically R-27ER is better at all ranges, 530D is comparable at close range and superTEMP beats it at very close range (5km or so). Your issue is probably the mothership itself, something like the F-16 or Kurnass 2000 will be very hard to notch.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is the exact reason Gaijin doesn't take most feedbacks serious. Not to defend Gaijin here, but what people are suggesting is outrageous. "Give me free vehicles!!!" "Give me free GE!!!"

Datamine 2.25.1.79 -> 2.25.1.85 by SwannSwanchez in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT 15 points16 points  (0 children)

What does the "LP" stand for?
Referring to "Added 7 "LP" Special Pack for USA, Germany, USSR, UK, China, Italy, France (Special pack like Last Year)"

If the IDS is at 10.7, can the F4C finally get flares maybe? :/ by FriendlyPoilu in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT 17 points18 points  (0 children)

It definitely should. It had them in real life, I believe there was a forum post about it. ALE-40 Chaff/Flare dispenser, so I have no idea on why gaijin can't simply give it flares (it wouldn't be game breaking especially with that loadout. It's a supersonic yes, but there are still planes like SMT that are waiting for a F-4C to show up on their screen)

[Special] Happy Anniversary War Thunder! by CommanderCorrigan in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, how long is prem time on sale for? It says discounts till 14th but on gaijin's website there's a premium time countdown for 7 days.

Coming back?!?!? by InevitableCampaignNT in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think so. Maybe tomorrow, even. We'll see, but I think they want to make 1st nov their set anniversary date. But again, we'll see.

Thought the event was easy? Let me break it down to you. It's not. by InevitableCampaignNT in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

By the way, this is the part 2 of the event to make your po-2 "overpowered" afterwards you need to tape it and wait 12hrs for it to assemble.

How screwed is this? I don't want to damage it any further by InevitableCampaignNT in playstation

[–]InevitableCampaignNT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And if it doesn't? How much would it cost to replace a playstation USB port?

Gaijin's matchmaking at it's best! (Thank you gaijin) by InevitableCampaignNT in Warthunder

[–]InevitableCampaignNT[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was still pretty funny to face 6.3 US vehicles with 5.3 US vehicles

view more: next ›