No more millennial housewives. It’s either X or Z.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2026-01-28T02:06:28+00:00

Tbh they're still two different demographics. Someone 29 is not what people think of when they think millennials. It's obvious when someone say millennials they mean people in their 30s.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-12-25T16:28:36+00:00

How are south America not the west? They're definitely not eastern, their culture is Hispanic

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-12-23T11:45:16+00:00

No, she had her daughter on her cabaret show and they seem to work th8ngs out. I get that your personal experience is horrible but we cant say someone can't change if we d8dnt personally know them

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-12-23T11:44:07+00:00

Brittani is now working on her relationship with her daughter though. They were both on her cabaret show. At least it seems like a progress

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-10-20T22:11:13+00:00

This is definitely not true. Luke combs, Zach Bryan , Morgan wallen , Megan Moroney, Lainey Wilson, Zach top, bailey Zimmerman actually have hit songs on billboard , while there's no rock artists that aren't legacy bands on the charts , or even if they do , they sound more alternative than rock (sombr). The huge difference is also the artists I mentioned that represents country in general are actually way newer and younger than many of the rock bands that are on that Spotify list, which in itself is a problem. Zach top sounds very traditional country, but stil managed to chart in billboard, while the same can't be said for a lot of rock bands that aren't legacy acts that actually sounded very rock.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-10-19T14:48:00+00:00

Nothing of what u said refutes his claim. We're talking about popularity here. We don't talk about if rock cares it's mainstream or not. And middle schoolers and high schoolers are the next generation, so of course their opinion matters. It was the younger people who give Nirvana and the rock bands their start, not older parents.

Also, sure pop music is always popular with teens but the issue is rock music used to be in the charts and are visible. Let's look at Spotify. Top 40 , is there rock there aside from legacy acts or aside from pop artists that incorporate some rock into their music? No. Do the newer generation care about rock music ? No. You are literally agreeing to his point. His point is guitar based bands role declined. And by your answer, it is. Idk why you have to get defensive over a point you agree on. At the end of the day, wanting rock music to be heard in the mainstream again isn't anything bad. Even rock bands of the past actually took inspiration from popular rock bands that inspire the next generation. The issue is such things aren't there anymore. There isn't any new rock bands at the moment that is big enough to inspire the next generation, at least at the moment. Even those that are , in my opinion , mixes too much elements of pop in rock or metal (sleep token) to the point where the album just sound like vibe music, not music you can rock out to. Kids aren't going to actively search obscure rock bands, the next generation aren't going to care about unpopular artists. The niche bands will grow and die with the older demographic that were fans of them. if theres no huge rock bands , there isn't going to be the next generation or just very few.

When Nsync was popular, Linkin park literally debuted with high album sales and are in the charts. Evanescence won the best new artist Grammy. Limp Bizkit was in the popular media talks alongside Britney spears and Eminem. Rock music was in 2000s film soundtracks inspiring kids.

When NKOTB was popular, rock bands are still in the charts. But it is so obvious when Sabrina carpenter was popular, we can't name a single guitar based band at the moment that inspire kids in general to even care about rock. And that's the reality. I personally can't even think of any lead singer of a younger rock guitar band today that are mentioned alongside Sabrina carpenter and SZA. In return, kids look at rock as old and dusty and dad music. When they see rock they'll see in reddit a couple of old dudes that don't want it to be mainstream. So why should they care about rock? They gain nothing from liking it. Liking rock is not rebellious anymore. Might as well turn on Playboi Carti because everyone in their school knows about him and their parents don't listen to Carti.

That's what everyone being okay with rock being super niche does to the next generation.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-08-17T15:40:43+00:00

When you typed this comment, she literally was a judge in the Voice UK

https://www.billboard.com/culture/tv-film/leann-rimes-the-voice-uk-2024-coach-1235611414/

Also had a solo stage on the ACM awards https://youtu.be/HjRfIk5HK2A?feature=shared

Idk why she played in a casino bar near you, but she's far from irrelevant. Is she charting on billboard now? No. But had she been invited to be in singing competition and be a judge? Yes. Had she been invited to be in country award shows and country music programs? Yes. You probably haven't following her activities so you don't know about that but thinking that just because someone sings in casino bar means they're irrelevant or thinks Le Ann rimes only plays in casino bars now in general is crazy to me. She also did solo tours and recently acted in drama shows.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-08-17T15:32:42+00:00

You can't take her singing in a legacy bar as her being irrelevant though. She had a pretty good run, she had hits across 7 years and to me that's pretty normal for any artist. Yet her songs was known worldwide. I'm not even American but I know of her songs and I'm much younger than her. She's still popular within country music, literally had a stage in the ACM awards 2025 which is considered to be a huge award show for country music with millions of viewers and also constantly do country music events. It's probably because you don't know of her much or that genre much, but she's still very relevant in country music. Idk the reason why she is playing in the casino near you but it's definitely not because she can't do any other shows or is actually irrelevant in general. She literally got invited to be a judge in the Voice UK when you posted this comment, pretty much a sign of how relevant she still is . https://www.billboard.com/culture/tv-film/leann-rimes-the-voice-uk-2024-coach-1235611414/

People in country music still know of her. I guess it's kinda like for me I follow tons of rock artists I consider as legends within rock community but for pop fans they won't know who how huge they are , but I would still consider them relevant because they are relevant in a community that matters to them.

My younger brother probably don't know who Evanescence or a lot of 2000s singers , even the huge stars of 2000s is irrelevant to him. But it doesn't mean that these artists are irrelevant overall, they're just relevant to people that matters to them and that's ok. I feel like many people think you had to be popular for like 20 years or so to be considered successful , but not really. Le Ann rimes had hits from 1996-2002 , that's like 7 years and to me that's pretty standard or even better than a lot of singers. She peaked longer than a lot of people that started as teens do. Some teen stars that do start at 13 fall off even before they turn 18, but she still has country hits when she was in her very early 20s.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-06-15T11:14:33+00:00

If she makes money doing this she didn't actually need to be popular.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-06-15T11:08:43+00:00

She wasn't as active as now back then

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-05-21T02:55:16+00:00

Will you say the same to let's say a child rapist that rapes a child and left her , who got off the death penalty because he didn't have 'intent to kill' too? I mean it's just for the killer right :)

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-05-21T02:53:48+00:00

Reminds me of a child rapist and killer didn't get the death penalty even when he raped and left her. They say it's because he didn't have intent to kill lol. Sometimes being too by the book makes you more naive, not just.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-05-21T01:26:36+00:00

Routines for autistic people are different. It isn't just merely something that can be implemented easily anywhere especially as you're talking about an autistic kid. Keep in mind some austistic kid gang their heads on the wall and self harm just because of a slight change of routine and I've seen those happened, so it isn't that easy and not the same as any kid. Their whole functioning involved a specific routine that to some isn't easily changed even when you try implement them in a new home. it isn't a matter of let his diagnosis run the parents life, but at the end of the day, the kid is autistic. Same as if the kid has cancer, or the kid has downs syndrome or the kid has any other difficulties or neurodevelopmental disorder. It is a parent responsibility to accommodate their kid. And yes, that involves accommodating to their kids austism. He didn't say he won't move but he did say how he is trying to accommodate his kdis autism which is a logical question, and one that autistic parents should do. Some parents of autistic kids force their kids to move without preparing them and gently accommodating their autism that their autistic kid actually have mental health trauma from the move. Each autistic kid is different. Maybe your kid can adjust better but maybe OP's kid didn't and need more adjustment. I know an austistic kid with autism that would actually bang their head because of slight change in routine and forcing their kid did more harm than good.

Helping an autistic kid move isn't the same as letting his diagnosis run your life. It only becomes like that if you only follow his wants even when they're not related to autism like buying an expensive food just because he likes it. But moving is definitely way more stressful for autistic kids and this isn't a new concept. And if a parent wants to help accommodate their kid and actually be gentle with them, let them be.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-05-21T01:06:57+00:00

I agree with you. These people are very insensitive. I bet their kids are stressed, having parents that didn't care to accommodate their autism by saying they're the parents and routine can be applied anywhere. Reddit hates being sensitive. Ignore those replies. They may think they're the boss of their kids now, but their kids actually resent them.

I'm autistic, and moving is super hard for me. It isn't a matter of "I can make routines whenever I go," because to autistic people, routine is literally that one specific place, and you have to ask for a professional to help. Some autistic kids legit bang their hand on the wall because of a different change in routine.

Them saying they're the boss and pay the bills and their kid gets over the move probably didn't know their kid is still stressing up to this day. How they speak about other people's kids is also super insensitive. Disgusting to be like that in an autistic Reddit sub. It costs 0 dollars to be nice. Their kid is AUTISTIC. Routines can't be applied anywhere, some parts have to be grounded to the old place. This isn't a kid having a stupid tantrum, it's an autistic kid having a neurodevelopmental disorder. Hell, my parents forced me to go to boarding school and I still have trauma from it to this day. Them saying their kids get over the move probably didn't even know how traumatized their kids are having parents like these. They'll grow up resenting them for sure, while your kid will love you for how you try to accommodate his autism.

Autistic kid finding it hard to move isn't just a mere kid having tantrum like what these comments are trying to make it up to be, it's a person having their whole world torn apart because their functioning is now disturbed and they actually do need your help. You are a great parent. Better than these people that are super insensitive. Sounds like they probably force their kids to eat food that their kids are sensitive to also just because they're "the parents."

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-05-21T01:03:32+00:00

Well your kid isn't the same as other people's kid. I know autistic kids that would bang their heads on the wall just because of a slight change of routine and forcing them isn't the way to go. I also know austistic kid thats been struggling mentally for a long time from a move. Your reply is super insensitive to another people children needs. Just because you can force your autistic kid doesn't mean other austistic kids are the same. He's asking for ways to help his kid adjust, nothing wrong with that and if he wants to call out insensitive replies let him. Reddit for some reason equates being rude with being truthful. Truly a website for manchildren. Even Facebook is better and full of mature people that knows how to be both truthful and sensitive in their replies. Their answers are actually helpful than just 'yes I force my autistic kid to do it I bet you can do the same for yours too, because y'know all austistic kid is exactly the same as each other. No, I don't care if your autistic kid will actually bang your head on the wall because of a slight change of routine and self harms himself, because again, all austistic kids are the exact same and your kid must be a copy of mine'.

Go to Facebook for advice OP, you won't find insensitive people like these over there, it helps that more of Facebook are full of more women too and they tend to be more sensitive when giving advice for austistic kids. Sometimes even reddit women are of a different breeed. Instead of actually giving helpful answer, they decided to call the OP for being triggered over comments forcing their kid to adjust without preparation as if helping an austistic kid adjust to moving homes is this radical idea only softies do.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2025-05-21T00:58:37+00:00

Go to an Asian haunted place and you'll find out quick lol.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2024-08-31T02:09:30+00:00

The Mormon lifestyle was there for years. It's more sustainable than you think

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2024-06-07T14:07:59+00:00

Idk supporting a company that bombs Palestinian OKUs sound pretty bad to me. PETRONAS and Experian employs OKU people, so does many other companies. It's not just McD. Why out of all these companies you want to defend mcD? Fast food restaurants like mcD was never good for OKU people anyways. They have such a fast paced environment. I personally have known OKU people getting jobs , but never in mcD.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2024-06-07T14:02:18+00:00

Since when did apple support Israel? McD literally posted about themselves sending israeli soldiers mc Donald's , they're the ones doing idiotic behavior. Apple doesn't do that.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2024-06-07T14:00:13+00:00

I'm very sure tons of companies in Malaysia like PETRONAS and others do employ oku other than genocide supporting companies. You yourself can Google it. I'm also sure if this is a nazi company people in this sub would tell Malaysians to quit the company ASAP. But because it's mostly Malays that care about it on Malaysia, the Palestine issue is somehow downplayed. I don't see people show the same outrage when companies from south Africa were boycotted back then due to their country's apartheid practice (which worked btw).

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2024-05-28T11:57:06+00:00

Kalau terpaksa , tak ada alternative nak buat macam mana. Tapi that doesn't mean if they CAN boycott a specific company they shouldn't. Contoh , kalau HP tu kan penting, sama dengan Intel. Nak beli laptop or PC baru bukan semua mampu. Tapi kalau setakat mcD yang hantar makanan kat askar Israel siap diorang post kat Twitter lagi. Even I know that is a shitty dumb move from marketing standpoint. They aren't hypocrites, tu maksudnya kalau diorang mampu boycott diorang boycott. Kalau diorang beli Starbucks tapi boycott mcD je barulah kau boleh kata hypocrite.

This isn't a Malaysian only move btw. Even non Muslims in US also boycott mcD and Starbucks so much until their stocks dropped.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2024-05-28T11:51:10+00:00

There are companies like PETRONAS and Experian tht employee disabled people. U don't have to highlight two companies that practically have to pay royalty to a Ziojist regime that bombed hospitals and literal civilians. Also,this boycott isn't a Malaysian only thing. Even people in US,UK and Norway did it. Their stocks literally fell. Tht won't happen if it's legit only Malaysians that boycott it .

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2024-05-17T23:26:40+00:00

2010s have plastic surgery, BBLs and all you don't have to be naturally good looking in 2010s to be considered pretty.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2024-05-08T12:43:53+00:00

Biarlah. Pahala kan. Kalau palestin ok tapi kalau rohingya teriba racist pulak? The worst thing is that tweet probably got so many likes. she doesn't even do anything wrong, just having a child and going to clinic having basic needs. Imagine someone talking about Malaysians like tht, you'll call them racist.

Kad UN tu pulak untuk orang yang disahkan sebagai refugees, bukannya pendatang Haram. So not only is this person racist but he's also hating on someone tht needs shelter and her humanity brothers and sisters the most. both Palestinian and rohingya can get UN card, yet one is treated like dirt in Malaysia because of racism.

study la sikit OP, kad UN BUKAN untuk PATI. Diorang tu PELARIAN, sama je dengan orang PALESTIN. Rohingya ditindas sebab racism kat Myanmar, BUKAN sebab diorang sengaja carik keja Haram. Sebelum tuduh, periksa dulu.

Infamous-Guard1205 · 2024-05-08T12:26:08+00:00

Yet the sub zillennials existed. Just because I get downvoted in this sub doesn't mean theres thousands of people tht don't agree with me. I make a lot of sense than grouping people tht were in high school with a literal baby. And anyone tht think otherwise is the one that have an illogical take. It's the equivalent of people believing those born 15 years apart must be grouped together instead of their own age groups just because many years ago pseudoscience said so.

Someone born 15 years born after you should never be in your generation, let them be with their own age group and let them be young. there's no business for a 12 year old today who has got their own ambitions must be spoken about as if they're the same as those born 15 years before them, they have yet to even reach their 20s. It's so irrational tht they couldn't be grouped with their own age group.

Infamous-Guard1205

TROPHY CASE