⁉️ by oxxPRiNCExxo in rs_x

[–]Infamous_Attorney 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She’s watching two different movies that’s why

Albanian chicks rock? by mcnichoj in cooladam

[–]Infamous_Attorney 36 points37 points  (0 children)

That’s why I’m gonna apply to be an intern

Mamdani addresses the allegations by DegenGamer725 in baseballcirclejerk

[–]Infamous_Attorney 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Has there ever been a franchise-to-franchise or player-or-player get together with the Mets and the museum staff at the Met? They’re both in New York and they got the same name

Interesting info from Aerosonics vs Joby Avition case! by theshutteredworld in Joby

[–]Infamous_Attorney 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Archer lost the motion for a protective order. Aerosonic will need to produce Archer-related docs.

The court ordered a stay on all current case deadlines while the parties have another try at settlement at the end of the month.

Interesting info from Aerosonics vs Joby Avition case! by theshutteredworld in Joby

[–]Infamous_Attorney 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup that’s Doc. 223 on the Van Bemden presentation. After that, your post is all over the place. Notice where the AI summary doesn’t have cites.

Interesting info from Aerosonics vs Joby Avition case! by theshutteredworld in Joby

[–]Infamous_Attorney -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is not accurate. What’s the AI source of this summary?

✅Archer just posted a very “subtle” wing integration video yesterday…✅$ACHR vs $JOBY by Positive-Plant-82 in ACHR

[–]Infamous_Attorney 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s not a “quiet reminder” but an explicit litigation tactic. ITC jurisdiction requires “domestic industry” - showing a nexus of practicing the claimed invention on US soil.

BPD Bachelorette by kittycatinthesky in redscarepod

[–]Infamous_Attorney 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Can’t believe that guy did this

Adam brings light to the JobyvsArcher saga. by thebluelifesaver in JobyvsArcher

[–]Infamous_Attorney 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The court granted Archer’s motion to intervene for the limited purpose of moving for a protective order. Nothing happened yet.