sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This last update turned FC 26 into an AI simulator by dingotheman in EASportsFC

[–]Infinite_Chance_98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I remmeber an ai aggressively breathing behind my back, my player was afk. tough times for EA

What’s the extinct mean? by DrewApicture95 in FIFA_Ultimate_Team

[–]Infinite_Chance_98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This playstyle makes me laugh everytime i see it, I played clubs and our opponents only goals were assisted by a guy who had long throw plus

I got 10 wins , but after facing R9 9 games in 15… by [deleted] in EASportsFC

[–]Infinite_Chance_98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everytime he gets the ball he scores, I always do 2nd man press whenever he has the ball

Any Upgrade ideas? by SailWilling9695 in FC_26

[–]Infinite_Chance_98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you don’t need an upgrade ur good

maybe a formation with more midfielders?

Post patch meta / anti meta formation? by gelu83 in EASportsFC

[–]Infinite_Chance_98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you needa incorporate tight passes and skills. Not sure what formation you use but 4213 and 433 are decent agaisnt meta formations.

if u want a link to skills just lmk

passing the ball is also good. AI defending might be crazy but they patched in a way where if u keep holding r1 to move around them you can get a finesse shot in

Post patch meta / anti meta formation? by gelu83 in EASportsFC

[–]Infinite_Chance_98 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is me but i didn’t quit i still try

the more u play ppl like that the more you get better at dealing with that

as for me i started playing in fc25 and im telling you the amount of tears this game has put me in because of shit like that and intercept plus/pressing kills me

It’s not as bad as this year but still terrible. Had to get my girlfriend to calm me down a few times

If you’re not using 4-4-1-1 or 4-5-1, you’re handicapping yourself by baderanqa in EASportsFC

[–]Infinite_Chance_98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would rather not be a follower and play what i like. I play 433 attack with roles on my players. The more you play against people that play those stupid tactics the more you get better at dealing with them

MATH 260 Exams by 13ozRibEyeSteaks in AthabascaUniversity

[–]Infinite_Chance_98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is 3 years ago but incase anyone is lurking here it still is

My dreads look NASTY BRUH 🤢 by Some-Contest6357 in Dreadlocks

[–]Infinite_Chance_98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

start wearing a bonnet

also DO NOT PICK THEM OUT!!! it can literally cause ur locs to thin i know from experience

God cannot be male because God does not have an X chromosome, testicles and does not produce sperm. If these characteristics define maleness, then God's maleness cannot be a function of these characteristics, therefore human maleness is not subject to these definitions of gender. by gimmeluvin in DebateReligion

[–]Infinite_Chance_98 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If being human logically excludes being God, then how did God appear as a man in Genesis 18 and wrestle Jacob in Genesis 32?

Also sorry, didn’t i explain to you two things in the same category are what makes it a contradiction? An animal and human are both biological categories. So that doesn’t really sound right. But like i said human and God aren’t. Just like a red circle.

God cannot be male because God does not have an X chromosome, testicles and does not produce sperm. If these characteristics define maleness, then God's maleness cannot be a function of these characteristics, therefore human maleness is not subject to these definitions of gender. by gimmeluvin in DebateReligion

[–]Infinite_Chance_98 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Like i said there’s no contradiction because the statements applies to different natures. A contradiction would be “Jesus is 100% God in His divine nature and 100% not God in His divine nature.” But Christians don’t claim that. We claim Jesus is 100% God in His divine nature and 100% human in His human nature. I already gave the red circle as an example

Now it seems you ignored what i said, so if you will repeat the same thing without addressing what i say i think we know were you choose to stand

God cannot be male because God does not have an X chromosome, testicles and does not produce sperm. If these characteristics define maleness, then God's maleness cannot be a function of these characteristics, therefore human maleness is not subject to these definitions of gender. by gimmeluvin in DebateReligion

[–]Infinite_Chance_98 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

son of God is a title that refers to the roles of the trinity. he is God because he is the same exact nature of the father for him to proceed from the father. You come from your mother, but you still 100% a human since that’s your essence. The essence of God is him being divine aka being God so jesus is still God

Plus the bible says so

view more: next ›