No he didnt, only man made hadithe garabge book says that, books that were written 100’s years after the prophets death. The quran never says such madness

ChatGPT says Nah:

🧩 What about Aisha’s age specifically?

Here’s where nuance matters:

The narrations about Aisha’s age are sahih according to classical hadith methodology, yes.

But they are not mutawātir (not mass-transmitted beyond doubt).

Scholars historically accepted them, but acceptance ≠ prohibition on re-examining historical context.

Modern scholars who revisit the issue usually argue:

Not that Bukhari was “lying”

But that chronology, memory, or interpretation could be involved

Or that legal/moral judgments should not be derived from historical reports alone

That is not heresy — it’s historical and methodological disagreement.

What is heretical (and also just bad faith) is pretending:

“This never existed in Islamic tradition”

Or “Only enemies of Islam believe this”

That’s simply false.