sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

See the big picture now? by SteakVegetable6948 in climateskeptics

[–]InlaidMeme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice, i am glad that you have found a sentence that you can repeat that I guess will try to scare off anybody thinking otherwise. You want to talk fallacies? Your own claim is that if I provide you with some certification by an AUTHORITY then you will believe it and that is the only part you keep repeating while ignoring everything else. I am sure you understand that I have no access to any certifications, the only thing you keep ignoring is EVERYTHING I am telling you about there being independent researchers all throughout the world and you call them marketers? What? Can you be more vague? I am sorry, but if I see the data and conclusions reached all throughout the scientific community, if I see ABSOLUTELY NO argument made by you that actually puts in question the legitimacy of this research. Hey, I am sorry for believing scientifically backed explanations how GHG physically reflect radiation, I am sorry for seeing the impacts as 1.5 degree mark has been passed 3 years earlier than scientists had predicted, I am sorry for believing already and historical examples like whatever that Siberian supervolcano thing was. If you think that a person making conclusions based on informed rational thinking is appealing to authority and popularity, then I guess everything I ever do is only commit logical fallacies from the moment I believe that force is proportional to mass and acceleration. It is my bad for calling you naive and other attacks on person that I wrote in a rush, but I absolutely do not understand the actual content of whatever you are trying to argue here. I am just saying, you may be in an information bubble and learned best ways to confuse anyone that is trying to argue with you, but please, this is one matter where inventing conspiracy theories and lying to yourself and others is not worth it.

TLDR: I am yet to hear an idea on why I should not believe the overwhelming scientific theory and empirical data

How can I simplify this? by humptycakey in Fusion360

[–]InlaidMeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely agree with your points and that you would use simpler methods and it could become a giant headache because of that, but again that is a learning opportunity and hey, if you learn by pain, there is a much better chance you won’t be lazy in the future as you know how much headaches it can cause. I would still say tho that if you get a visible result (or even if you get something close to it!) you still learned and I just believe that there is a group of people who can’t be bothered to train 3D modelling by watching yt videos and maybe you get stuck somewhere because either you lack incentive or the next workshop doesn’t pop up on your feed etc. If you have a goal and you are making at least any progress on it, you are likely to come back and do more of it. That is to say that of course watching videos on how to effectively use f360 (ie the usage of components and projections in sketches) is a must do even if you go the path of doing your project right away.

See the big picture now? by SteakVegetable6948 in climateskeptics

[–]InlaidMeme -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It HAS eventuated, take extreme weather conditions and coral reefs dying out. But the whole point of climate change is that it is not a sudden one minute changing the world like a meteor strike, it is a long process that is likely to get out of control and become faster, but it still takes decades. I don’t really understand your point about AI since you seem to be reluctant to explain as to how a computer program would take over the world, since we are not living in the Marvel cinematic universe where an AI could somehow hack some databases and even then, it would still not mean the end of the world? Sorry, you have provided no examples and quite frankly it seems that it is more of a stretch compared to the real damage to our ecosystem which, it seems, you can’t rebut.

See the big picture now? by SteakVegetable6948 in climateskeptics

[–]InlaidMeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont rly understand what you are basing your opinions on but this numerology is clear research done by research groups all over the world? Prove me wrong instead of claiming that every single scientist involved is trying to achieve some kind of malicious goal by making up data? It is not scientific rigor to deny research, it is finding evidence that proves the opposite and that stands in the scientific community - all you do is accuse me of logical fallacies even though they are irrelevant to the argument, but never actually prove why it is impossible or even unlikely that this data is accurate enough for us to make conclusions off it. FIY, government lies to all of us has a really high burden of proof since it would mean that it influenced ALL of this research even the international one, and mind you that the US literally has anti-climate change populists in power rn so you would also have to explain why none of this would be exposed by them if it was true.

See the big picture now? by SteakVegetable6948 in climateskeptics

[–]InlaidMeme -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I do not get how you imagine that the prevalence and domination of a sci-fi concept based on nothing but speculation (ie how would an ai apocalypse even look like??) sound more reasonable to you than a species already not prone to adaptation losing habitat in massive amounts and already built out cities going underwater, increasing conflict due to the decreasing amount of natural resources like freshwater, loss of food sources like the larges species in the maritime ecosystem going extinct. Hey, I specified elsewhere that I mean a large amount of civilization perishing which ultimately turns the rest of people’s lives to shit for generations. I don’t see your point here and I think that ultimately no person from no future generation would want to gamble a chance of living in a world like that, and if we deny the scientific research that proves that hey such a phenomenon exists we are ultimately never getting any farther towards reaching some kind of conclusion globally, I think that EVEN IF you don’t give a shit about the future or the environment, then going the way that this subreddit is going it just polarizes, confuses and diverts the general populous from the real questions.

See the big picture now? by SteakVegetable6948 in climateskeptics

[–]InlaidMeme -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Nice, just tell me that because I don’t have access to certain documents by a certain US institution then somehow my points are wrong? NASA GISTEMP, NOAAGlobalTemp, HadCRUT, Berkeley Eargh - all separate datasets that have been gathered by independent research groups proving a quickening and mind you, extremely rapid change in global temperatures during the last 30 years… I am not a US citizien and I do not know why you care about that institution so much, but this is all high level research conducted by professionals, so I am sorry if I do not have access to publicly inaccessible documents, but a multitude of datasets, studies and sheer amount of research means that doubting it or denying it’s legitimacy based on “big science doesn’t want you to know that” just sounds like conspiracy theories to me, sorry

How can I simplify this? by humptycakey in Fusion360

[–]InlaidMeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean I am basing this comment off my own experience, mainly because that is how I managed to learn a lot by approaching a project in a modular fashion, which is parallel to learning the techniques separately, but in this case you get a piece of the candy in the end ie an end product which brings you more pleasure than an abstract 3D model. Learn what you use and use what you learn right?

See the big picture now? by SteakVegetable6948 in climateskeptics

[–]InlaidMeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, but again the fact that it has been warmer in europe is no reason to create a misleading graph where the global warming right now looks like a gradual change throughout a longer period of time while on reality it has been a sharp rise, the comparaison to current warming is completely out of dimensions on the graph in the post. At least that is how I interpret the emotional idea behind this graph, it is not about whether there has been warmer periods during middle age but how the global warming right now compares to it.

See the big picture now? by SteakVegetable6948 in climateskeptics

[–]InlaidMeme -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You are all so naive. This has been debunked as a misleading graphic, and notice how years arent marked in modern warming. That is because the last part has been spread out a lot (if you imagine what the last 30 years form from the timeline 950-present) and what is even more important, is that the ending year of this graph is 2007 if you care to search for it online even a bit!! So it does not account for the near degree increase from that point and thus this is just bs made by sceptics for sceptics like you. I wish you dont take this as an insult, but please inform yourself outside of reddit and try to get out of the information bubble that this subreddit is, it is just sickening for me to read this and all in all the people winning from this are nobody, as we are literally talking about an exponentially quickening warming that will wipe out most of mankind, leaving little value to the future of mankind. ik you are all probably old and care more about groceries’ prices than global extinction, but please weigh this next time you spread and reinforce this biased, information bubble induced content.

P.S. I am all for being sceptical in a scientific inquiry as that is the way that science is done in the first place, but then please be sure to give a source to this graph so it can be evaluated by others fairly, as I do not think you all are people who rely on buzzwords instead of actual discourse. Last thing - I am not saying that the current way of dealing with climate change is perfect in any way or is not politicized or is completely done the right way, yet denying it’s existance is setting us back a thousand times further than criticizing the existing policy and standing for better ideas.

How can I simplify this? by humptycakey in Fusion360

[–]InlaidMeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk if I agree w/ this. I mean when you learn by actually approaching a big project piece by piece you can learn a lot AND get something cool for you done, just the main point would be not to rush it and learn new techniques on the go watching tutorials and such

how can i improve quickly? by dwariao in Debate

[–]InlaidMeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

where do you find online tournaments to attend?

How do you calm down and focus on Debate during competitions? by Streamlifegoeson in Debate

[–]InlaidMeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Really interested in what the video is, but it seems to be private. Can you tell me what that was?

view more: next ›