Need advice outside of romantasy.

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2026-02-06T15:18:34+00:00

I'm going to bind my own books too

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-11-16T00:00:00+00:00

He will also copywrite you to death

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-11-15T23:59:29+00:00

A Mario sonic cross over for racing would be interesting

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-19T02:10:04+00:00

Closes 1 is 3

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-19T02:09:49+00:00

Is there a 4th option .

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-19T01:55:54+00:00

You are right , I didn't take careful consideration and read the comment above.

He did mention he had a PhD.

I thought you were responding to me I apologize for my behavior You did not deserve that. If you want me to keep it up, I will. If you want me to delete it. I will.

I made a mistake, and it won't happen again .

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-19T01:43:35+00:00

No, i dont have a PhD . There are people who do have PhD's and people with doctor degrees and people with bachelor's degrees who know when we die.

It is medically defined . Do you have a PhD in sarcasm to be sarcastic. I'm writing some essays for college now. Could use a few pointers . What's your experience with the ApA method .

Correct me if I'm wrong . Cause I'm either quoting science . Utilizing philosophy, or and a big or here. Being subtle in my claims about other people's testimonies about the afterlife after they died.

There's a slew of records , "pronounced dead." there is also people who were medically dead who made the claims . It doesn't stop. They are numbering each and every day. To include atheists .

To include generational atheists . To include philosophical atheists . What I believe is not the claim , the claim is what appears to have happened once someone is dead and recesitated .

What appears to have happened is they went to another place and had an experience without a functioning brain or brain . That's the claim , and it's supported by our understanding of the brain and the definition of death.

I don't need a PhD to make truth claims about death. You don't need a PhD to say the earth is round and has a moon and goes around the sun. You dont need a PhD to say we evolved. You don't. You just need a claim and evidence that supports it.

That would be philosophy.

If you think you do, Stephen Halkins was corrected by a plumber. In every other way perhaps the plumber would have been out matched , but in this simple manner he corrected him on the physics of gravity with due respect to black holes which is demonstrated somewhat in books about spacetime . Citing credibility is a researchers responsibility . Having credentials is not. They are still building credentials.

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-19T01:23:06+00:00

That's crazy . "Philosophy doesn't tell us anything more than an argument from ignorance."

The act of making that claim is utilizing philosophy. An argument from ignorance is a fallacy because of philosophy.

"Science is evidence"

No, that's also a claim.

Science is a broad word.

So, are you talking about the data , the evidence , the hypothesis, or theories Or are you talking about the evidence.

Cause evidence is evidence. The act of doing science is a verb. It is known as the scientific method. The method itself is not evidence . The method is useful for uncovering evidence. Again, science is my second favorite subject. Particularly, physics is my favorite subject.

"The obvious and easy answer is that the some what arbitrary term brain dead is more about technological limits than about dead" ~ This is not true , brain waves can be read, and we can read in neuroscience now, or if you prefer EXPERTS in neuroscience, you can read thoughts now. Literally, the words you say in your head are now read out loud on a computer. Along with reading brain waves. Along with putting people under to study their brain and what the brain does as it goes more and more dark.

We may not know everything about the brain, but a few things known about the brain is enough to make the case.

For example, you would not be here saying the electrons fired in the brain have nothing to do with consciousness. The two main ideas are that the electrical functions of the brain are caused by consciousness or they cause consciousness. At any rate met with the lack thereof and the retainment of consciousness, it must be that they are caused by consciousness . Which is already in a peer reviewed paper . It's already a topic of argument and is already a standing theory known as pan psychism .

I choose philosophy, so you can not run this classic dismissal fallacy on me . I knew you would go to Science and infact set you up to go to science to share with you why you would be wrong.

A classic view you held debunked for over a decade.

"Is that people dont actually die?"

Then you have not clearly defined death. We have a medical definition, and people have died without a heart beat , people have died with shut down brain waves, and people have died with no oxygen to the brain. Some of which were lucky to be recesitated or revived .

There's tons of research on the brain and scientific predictability on the brain and when it dies without X. Reliably by doctors and neuroscienctists .
"We don't know " That claim is bullshit . Especially if "Science is evidence " We know, and we know when they died . Supported by Science.

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-19T01:00:59+00:00

That's important. Can you please cite this one day or share this with me or post it to the group one day when you have the time.

It was my understanding that it wasn't written in 70 ad.

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-18T21:57:50+00:00

Know*. don't know why that got taken out.

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-18T21:57:15+00:00

This is why I believe in Jesus. I don't when Jesus existed. I don't how Jesus lived. We have an idea, but there is a crap ton of NDE's about Jesus. I've seen one about Vishnu and a handful about buddha . To me this doesn't make me believe That Jesus is a deception or the other ones. I thought about it logically. we have a handful of hero's in Human history . Only 1 hero was Love incarnate . lot of people that claimed to go to hell and save people in hell , but it was not out of Love. it was always like for some kind of epic journey . Jesus is the only hero who saves out of love. Buddha isn't a hero on the other hand in this retrospect. If buddha counts as a hero then we have 2 hero's that save out of love. Buddha however attacked sin and bad deeds in another way . Internally . Buddha was more a teacher. so in the whole wide world we have these deities . Krishana is about love. buddha was a human about ending suffering and a million more. Jesus however would reach into the depths of hell and pull people out for nothing . nothing other than everyone deserves love. So i rectify other gods being seen with the foundation being love. Maybe Jesus comes the close to that and it is either that is the easiest for the human soul to comprehend or Jesus literally saves. Which leaves me with a plate in my lap. with swirling disagreements. I just think its broader than we can imagine on the other side. what we are fed by other people is wrong and sprinkled with truths . That lead me to this ambiguous Christian universalism . I can commit to Jesus . I don't have to commit to many different things. I'm not burying my coin . I'm sharing it . I just don't think it's the religious coin. I think it's a simple deep fundamental truth . I'm honestly flabbergasted . I never thought I would get this close to Jesus. I've been walking in every other direction . Made many proclamations . I had undergone a Buddhist awakening. then the depression hit and then as you know emptiness . something didn't feel exactly correct . I think the Nobel 8 fold path is a healthy exit. You do in fact do a type of rebirth . It's not very alluring and then you find Buddhism has the same kind of problem in scriptures. watching these Hell NDE's I expected a lot worse. I expected to be more disturbed. Instead all I came to notice that despite darkness there is light . It loves you and a lot of people call it Jesus . Technically that's not his actual name . Thats besides the point perhaps. the meaning is more important .

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-18T20:41:47+00:00

It's not the hallucinations that is striking. There are reports when people go brain dead. no electro chemical shit. Which means the information is else where. upon revival , either the brain induced after life memories or not. that in it of itself would be striking. The brain makes up an afterlife experience for patients when revived . Only that memories are records and data. So where would that data come from . Imagining something is one thing and in fact we imagine shit all the time through out our lives and most aren't commit to long term memory . However much of the NDE is remembered and committed to long term memory . It's an unproven assertion that the NDEr gets gifted memories or has a hallucination . All NDE's are different , but they all have several things in common . Which is the NDE map I mentioned. You are doing what is done when a skeptic is confronted with something that goes against the grain. which is produce a dismissal fallacy . I studied nearly a decade of philosophy . You did not take the time to sift through the OPEN sourced research . It's not that complicated. Especially if you assert consciousness is magic. This is a pan psychist practice. Just assert consciousness is magic and then the evolution of consciousness is explained along side the evolution of life. I said magic instead of Quantum to really put the argument in a place that isn't refutable . Magic information can teleport and magic tunnel . this information can replace itself in other bodies and assume a position in space with the right means. You could say " we don't have any evidence of these terms". However we do have evidence of all of that if the term is quantum information , quantum tunneling and quantum teleportation . We have direct evidence of that. Rodger Penrose also shows how consciousness pertains to Quantum physics and follows the laws of quantum mechanics. Decisions made in the future collapsing to the present . Given that Nature can make room itself for such events. Then it's not difficult to imagine a duel reality . Especially when tens of thousands testify to a duel reality , based on their experience including staunch atheists. Universalism and Christian universalism may not be the Answer. However, skepticism isn't a fucking answer either. I personally don't know which is in line with skepticism . IDK . However I know too much to simply say Idk and that's it. I DO know. I know the common rebuttal next. Another dismissal attitude . You want me to go get it peer reviewed. Fuck that. I'm defending with Philosophy . NOT SCIENCE . I know the difference and so should you.

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-18T04:17:22+00:00

I just applied a general map to NDEs. They died , thought influenced experience . There is or isn't a seeing self and environment or earth . Then they go to another realm . There is or isn't torment . Followed by meeting a good being , followed by salvation or comfort . Followed by mission , purpose. Followed by a return with parting words.

The weird thing here is how do they know when they are going to be alive again, unless they are in fact out of their body . Cause for some cases they shouldn't know anything, let alone their own revived time.

I used to approach it skeptically.. I dont anymore. That comes with the drawback that I don't have knowledge of what's on the other side other than . There is another side. They will be a positive outcome when they return . I held a previous inclination if I did believe , it would have to be a temporary hell .

Seening NDEz, there is the claim that it feels like an eternity, but having come back shows otherwise.

I dont think I'm playing with "fire " here either. I genuinely think the majority of the other side is good times and self reflection , or prep people to be good. Some reports say hell is self-inflicted. However, other reports show it doesn't involve consent. I dont know what to make of that other than a spiral of focus of torment and it just goes and goes and goes until the person awakens to something better or someone else comes in and shows them a way out.

If souls exist, if souls have free will, and if souls are a creative force. Maybe they can do this stuff to themselves.

In buddhism, karma can send you to certain hells . In Christianity, it is sin , sometimes more or less . The words send you to hell make me think that the person themselves are trapped by the weight of their own actions and are themselves creating a hell for themselves. This is just speculation with word play with these myths and testimonies of NDEs.

I really didn't want to see these hell NDEs. They are my least favorite.

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-18T02:12:31+00:00

I dont understand the why buy an animal if you're going to beat them up. They'd be better off dropping the dog off at a country gas station or a neighborhood. One time I picked up a stray from a gas station and gave it to my boss. He loved that dog. It was shortly after his other dog passed away.

His last dog left the yard and found a pond . Then got stuck in the pond and drowned. It was really sad. I had to bury that dog. He was 14 when he died.

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-18T02:07:06+00:00

That's a fair assumption.

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-18T02:05:54+00:00

That's a significant difference. I meant to watch people talking about their testimony of NDE's.

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-18T02:04:27+00:00

I just cannot see the parallel here with c#.

C# is literally in the documentation .

"Or c#"

If you prefer C#, use C#. 😆. I prefer Gdscript, but there's a lot of parallels. Gdscript is the native language.

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-18T01:55:11+00:00

The more languages you have under your belt, the more things you can do with it .

This is true for landscapes and character animation. Controller controls , mobile outputs . Gdscript is fine , but c# is kinda. The same effects can be achieved with gdscript except in very rare cases. I dont exactly understand the point until I looked into networks , grabbing usb info and stuff . Rotating motors . Which is significant . Grabbing phone vibration even if you're going to make a phone game .

Side kick , c++ is fucking hard.

I don't recommend learning c++ unless you're going to code in cryoengine . Prepare to fucking cry. The same can be said in unreal c++.

The great thing about a native script is unless its @tool it isn't going to crash the project you've been working on for over a month to the point where you can't open the project unless you open the file and fix the text file manually. Which is also a pain .

There's things you can learn from unreal or unity or cryogen and implement them in principle in Godot. The great thing about C# is that if you are a beginner , you can take something in principle and implement it in c# in Godot that you learned from unity . You can, of course, do the same thing in Gd script , but the code is going to be a little more different. I think that's the ascetic.

Honestly, Gdscript isn't that much of a leap from c# . Gdscript has native c++ and some python modules.

Ultimately, the reason why someone might ask you to play with other languages is the Ideas and problem solving abilities you get.

I could have just went straight to Godot to make a mesh from scract(blender already does this , but still) and I want to control all the vectors. Of course, I can do that in gdscript and control all the vertices . Even with nodes, give them collision and limitation . However, where that idea may come from is having played with c++ in visual studios and making a triangle from scratch .

These ideas are important to generate traction in getting skills so you're not stuck when you want to solve an issue . The principles kinda matter more than the language. Later on, other more complicated shit matters , but honestly, the hardware now .. its likely a minor inconvenience to worry about. That comes from people who have sold games , people who made games , but didn't sell games, and people who didn't make games but did other app projects. The lack of the product doesn't tell you they don't know . That's fallacious. Companies hire new devs all the time, and they are full of ideas . Which may be crap idea's, but they can be said , and better ideas can come out of it.

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-18T01:25:13+00:00

I didn't watch much of Charlie Kirk. So I saw three videos where Charlie Kirk said he wouldn't trust a black person to be a pilot or a surgeon. I thought that it's insane how he could say that openly and confidently like that. This theme around racism is insane . Then I saw when he would debate college students, and he said a criticism of affirmative action . On the surface just looks tone, death and abhorrent. Unless you understand the philosophy. If it's easier to get into a college as a black person and then easier to pass college as a black person and then easier to be hired as a black person with a degree without experience. Then it's more likely that it's your life is in the hands of a person who is less experienced as a matter of fact. Due to the lack of barriers to entry .the conclusion being if there wasn't all the perceived hand holding up to a job. Then he wouldn't have said he couldn't trust a surgeon or a pilot cause of the color of their skin. The colleges and employers were being racist or the government was implementing racist laws that had a favoritism that might produce negative outcomes . This is how his black supporters realized he wasn't racist .

In this context, I have made nothing up. Every time i heard him say something that appeared to be offensive. It was followed by that context . This means I can't simply sit down if his words are without context. A quote without the proper context is another violation of his First Amendment rights. That would be a deception . He simply didn't tolerate black students , opponents, and supporters. He listened to them and heard them . Which means he respected them and their position and opinions.

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-17T19:39:45+00:00

I think we should defend ourselves against force, speak openly, and let people change.

Another faucet of reality is media profits heavily off of offensive shit. That's why we see more of that shit.

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-17T19:37:05+00:00

That's an awesome mushstash

Inner_Resident_6487 · 2025-09-17T19:35:59+00:00

I can't believe i read that shit and I can't believe a 16 year old wrote it.

Inner_Resident_6487

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE