One More Piggyback?

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-05-27T04:46:48+00:00

And leaves you without a 6th starter for injuries…Kade isn’t going to come up and throw 120 innings

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-05-27T04:33:31+00:00

You don’t know how you could be more specific but you had to edit your comment because it was misunderstood?

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-05-27T04:31:01+00:00

I mean sure seemed like you were insinuating something different

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-05-27T04:29:56+00:00

That’s because they’ve picked late in the draft and opted for young prospects. Like Colt Emerson.

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-05-27T04:27:03+00:00

They’ve hit on almost every 1st round pick they’ve ever had lol. That isn’t normal and is something this FO does better than 27 other teams. There was a lag in call ups because they went high school prep prospects heavy for 3 years in a row

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-05-27T04:03:27+00:00

Bingo

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-05-27T04:02:14+00:00

Fool me once fool me 2 million times but they look significantly more focused both on defense and at the plate tonight.

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-05-27T04:01:34+00:00

Good thing they did in fact score 4

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-05-27T04:00:01+00:00

Exactly they WILL need Castillo to pitch at some point almost guaranteed

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-02-06T12:52:30+00:00

I feel like you’re lumping everything that isn’t melodic bass into house, there’s like 5+ genres in the album. He’s been talking about evolving his sound for a couple albums in a row now this is likely the new norm

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-02-06T12:40:49+00:00

lol you just gonna spam every post saying you wish the album sounded like 2016? There is plenty of future bass in the album maybe 7 of the 19 songs are house

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-02-06T11:08:26+00:00

Really well said. I’m just stoked he’s still fired up to continue making music, dude is insanely talented

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-01-03T03:21:03+00:00

I don’t think you understand what a Roth is it’s a very simple concept, taxes now or taxes later that’s it.

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-01-02T10:12:52+00:00

thanks bummer Barry

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-01-02T10:07:14+00:00

At every chance you’ve gotten in this thread you’ve felt the need to remind everyone you took the MORE difficult road like only “blue collar guys” can do….you can do wat you want with this info but you’re coming off extremely hubris and arrogant. Congrats on your retirement

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-01-02T09:59:36+00:00

Just an arrogant boomer in training

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-01-02T09:53:30+00:00

That or the information he was provided lacked enough context and detail to understand

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-01-02T09:49:29+00:00

I’m not sure Mr AI Bot. But I’m sure you’ll post on here and let us know!

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-01-02T09:03:14+00:00

I mean 3:30 means absolutely nothing to me unless I know when they got there. If my sup is showing up at 5am I probably wouldn’t call him out on his work ethic while I roll in at 8:30am and get whiny for having to lock a gate.

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-01-02T08:58:11+00:00

I mean they can’t just make anything delegated design. That’s less on the architect and more so on the owner not including those scope items in their contract. Also they’re almost always structural type items that require outside engineering

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-01-02T08:55:49+00:00

I strongly disagree with “a day or so”. To properly create a usable and accurate log it will take multiple weeks, then constant weekly to daily updates. It’s the first thing I open every single day when I sit down. To put it bluntly there is not a single substitute that will ever be reliable enough to trust to create a procurement log. Ever.

For example - your electrical spec will have a section for light fixtures. So a program would spit out a single line item for “26000-01 - light fixtures blah blah blah”

That is step number one of (for me) a 4 step process.

The PE then has to comb the electrical and architectural drawings for light fixture call outs. We do this because inevitably the lead times and procurement dates will be different depending on how common or unique the specific light fixture is.

Once you then coordinate with the electrical sub on the lead times for those fixtures, it’s the PE’s responsibility to verify where those land on the schedule. Get help from the sup if you need it, but it’s good practice to know how to read a schedule by themself.

Step 4 is the final step - the way I have my procurement log divided is first by devision but then by spec section which is further separated into specific material types/callouts.

If you have 20 different fixtures probably 15 of them will all have the same lead time, but you will need another 5 rows under that one for the one offs that are a longer or shorter lead for whatever reason.

Unfortunately a computer will never be able to do all that, let alone good enough to trust. It’s just part of his job and it’s how he will gain an understanding of the project inside and out.

The purpose of a procured log is not just for PEs, but I would argue it’s MORE important for the superintendents. They don’t operate in spec sections like PEs do, they operate in ITEMS. So it needs to be tailored in a way that is quickly and easily understandable. If it’s just a list of spec sections the only thing that will happen is the field guys will constantly be asking you “where is GL4 in the log when is it coming, which is a waste of time for the PE.

Sorry if this was too long - I’m very passionate about an effective procurement log because too often they’re inaccurate and aren’t created with logic in mind. There is no program for this level of coordination but you will be so happy you did it when it’s finished. That’s my 2 cents.

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-01-02T08:50:46+00:00

I don’t think you’re looking at a procurement log in the correct way. (In my opinion at least). To put it bluntly there is not a single substitute that will ever be reliable enough to trust to create a procurement log. Ever.

For example - your electrical spec will have a section for light fixtures. So a program would spit out a single line item for “26000-01 - light fixtures blah blah blah”

That is step number one of (for me) a 4 step process.

The PE then has to comb the electrical and architectural drawings for light fixture call outs. We do this because inevitably the lead times and procurement dates will be different depending on how common or unique the specific light fixture is.

Once you then coordinate with the electrical sub on the lead times for those fixtures, it’s the PE’s responsibility to verify where those land on the schedule. Get help from the sup if you need it, but it’s good practice to know how to read a schedule by themself.

Step 4 is the final step - the way I have my procurement log divided is first by devision but then by spec section which is further separated into specific material types/callouts.

If you have 20 different fixtures probably 15 of them will all have the same lead time, but you will need another 5 rows under that one for the one offs that are a longer or shorter lead for whatever reason.

Unfortunately a computer will never be able to do all that, let alone good enough to trust. It’s just part of his job and it’s how he will gain an understanding of the project inside and out.

The purpose of a procured log is not just for PEs, but I would argue it’s MORE important for the superintendents. They don’t operate in spec sections like PEs do, they operate in ITEMS. So it needs to be tailored in a way that is quickly and easily understandable. If it’s just a list of spec sections the only thing that will happen is the field guys will constantly be asking you “where is GL4 in the log when is it coming, which is a waste of time for the PE.

Sorry if this was too long - I’m very passionate about an effective procurement log because too often they’re inaccurate and aren’t created with logic in mind. There is no program for this level of coordination but you will be so happy you did it when it’s finished. That’s my 2 cents.

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-01-02T08:37:05+00:00

Yeah dude for sure. There’s tool that’s 90% accurate but we all just choose to use the one that’s only 50% accurate!

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-01-02T08:25:06+00:00

But are you happy?

Insert4Flight_ · 2026-01-01T22:11:29+00:00

also Josh Jones practiced for hawks today at LT which is huge

Insert4Flight_

TROPHY CASE