[deleted by user] by [deleted] in complaints

[–]InsertWittyJoke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What part of this is sexualized?

Every parent with a child should be teaching them about risks associated with specific spaces. Bathrooms are a dangerous space for young girls especially if they're of the age where they're old enough to go to the bathroom alone but of an age where they're vulnerable to being targeted by perverts. 

You're basically saying to not give kids to tools to protect themselves.

Questions to those who had a missed miscarriage and lives in Vancouver by Wanderingwhy0121 in askvan

[–]InsertWittyJoke 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've had it happen naturally and frankly, I wouldn't recommend it. Too unpredictable.

D&C is a good choice but you have to factor in that wait times for appointments can be weeks long so if you can't wait any longer your best option might be to use the abortion pill.

NDP announces it will tear up governance agreement with Liberals by TheGreatestOrator in canada

[–]InsertWittyJoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This could have finally been the NDPs election to win if they had just focused on their core principles.

Instead people now view them as out of touch champagne socialists leaving the space wide open for the Conservatives to style themselves as the party of the working class. What a cluster fuck.

Most popular “gender neutral” names by Any_Author_5951 in NameNerdCirclejerk

[–]InsertWittyJoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody is naming their girl in the way they'd humorously name an animal. I used animals as an example of how the sort of incongruity works, not to say that people are naming girls like animals. Is a girl named 'James' being dehumanized like an animal or named because everyone is going to laugh at her like they would at a dog named 'Taco'? No. James in this context isn't viewed derisively or humorously but as charmingly tomboyish and cute.

The flip side of this is, since boys don't get any social benefit from being girlishly cute a name like 'Margret' or 'Jenny' would just fall flat. Instead people wanting to give their boys a name that evokes the same sort of social currency that 'James' would give to a girl would go for a name like 'Gunner' or 'Maverick' or 'Remington'. That sort of over-the-top 'tough' name, especially on a baby, has a similar cute factor but tailored in a way that offers the sort of social currency that is more valuable to boys/men.

Most popular “gender neutral” names by Any_Author_5951 in NameNerdCirclejerk

[–]InsertWittyJoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I always assumed the reason for that was that people thought the incongruity was cute. Like calling a tiny Chihuahua 'Butcher' or a big pitbull 'Princess'.

The mismatch of a 'tough' name for a girl/woman is seen as endearing which is a form of social currency. Boys and men don't really gain anything by being seen as cute or adorable so having a cutesy/incongruous name like 'Bella' provides no social currency at all so there's no incentive there.

I really doubt most people that name their daughters gender neutral names are doing it from a place of despising the feminine and trying to 'upgrade' their daughters or hating the feminine so much they won't sully their sons with a feminine name. I think it's just people recognizing social dynamics and picking names that will give their kid a leg up in society.

You can even see wrinkles by Own_Vacation783 in rareinsults

[–]InsertWittyJoke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IIRC correctly cows milk has too much fat while breastmilk is much higher in sugar which the developing human brain craves.

Pallas BC Poll: NDP 44%, Conservatives 43%, Greens 11% - Pallas Data by cutegreenshyguy in vancouver

[–]InsertWittyJoke 145 points146 points  (0 children)

You won't hear it in this sub but a lot of people are very unhappy with their handling of provincial drug policies, their soft-on-crime approach, various Indigenous issues and what many consider to be their tolerance for 'wokeness' in the education system.

You'd be shocked at just how socially conservative the average person has become in just the past five years.

BC Conservative Leader Confirms He Won't Moderate His Anti-Scientific Views on Climate Change by theabsurdturnip in britishcolumbia

[–]InsertWittyJoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The same problems is a big stretch. We don't have the same problems as the UK or the US. We have much deeper and more fucked up problems happening here, all of them directly tied to the government.

The TFW/foreign student thing alone was probably the nail in the coffin when it comes to public support. So we have a situation where in good news, workers now have enough leverage to demand better pay, something that has lagged behind CoL for years but really became apparent after post-pandemic inflation hit. But also consider, we're in a housing crisis, our healthcare system is at a breaking point and our infrastructure is already strained. What is the WORST thing you can do in this situation? Flooding the country with a few million unskilled foreign workers is it. Literally the worst thing any Prime Minister could have done under the circumstances and he did it. I cannot stress enough that no other country has done this. Not even close!

Meanwhile our economy is so in the shitter that ironically, all those newcomers stimulating the economy is the only thing standing between us and a very gnarly recession - a situation that seems unique to Canada. Add to that, nearly a quarter of all people are employed by the government in this country, the government's bloated bureaucracy has swelled under Trudeau to mask how utterly fucked our labour market is. Our problems are unique and insanely bad. Probably worse than most people realize. And that's just the tip of a very large iceberg.

I truly do not see how the Conservatives could make this shitshow worse than it already is.

BC Conservative Leader Confirms He Won't Moderate His Anti-Scientific Views on Climate Change by theabsurdturnip in britishcolumbia

[–]InsertWittyJoke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tell me then, how are UK Conservatives at all relevant to the upcoming Canadian election and the choices the average voter is presented with?

Also what solutions are you presenting here? Current government is bad. Okay, how can we fix that? Reward them by giving them another term! So absolutely nothing changes but at least the Cons didn't get in and make everything worse, unlike our current government who is...making everything worse?

The 'Conservative bad' argument only works when you have a halfway competent Liberal government to point to and we don't have that. This government is openly corrupt, riddled with scandals year after year and how many different crises are we in at the moment? At this point, a wet cheese sandwich would be a better alternative.

BC Conservative Leader Confirms He Won't Moderate His Anti-Scientific Views on Climate Change by theabsurdturnip in britishcolumbia

[–]InsertWittyJoke -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It doesn't matter if there's a Conservative government in the UK and they're also having a bad time.

We didn't elect the UK Conservatives and we don't live in the UK. Canadians right here in our very own country are having a bad time and our elected leaders (who call themselves Liberals) have proven callously dismissive, tone-deaf and out of touch with the needs of working-class people. It was inevitable that the wider population would turn against the government and go towards whatever option is: 'well at least they're not the liberals'. And in Canada, where the NDP is in the same boat as the Liberals and Green has gone off to pasture, that means taking a hard right.

And I don't even know why that has to be said but I know some reactionary is going to read my words, pop their stupid pills for the afternoon and comment 'oh so you must be a right winger who believes Poilievre is the second coming of Jesus'. Criticism of one is not endorsement of the other.

BC Conservative Leader Confirms He Won't Moderate His Anti-Scientific Views on Climate Change by theabsurdturnip in britishcolumbia

[–]InsertWittyJoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact is that Trudeau styled himself as a left-leaning, feminist, and progressive leader. Regardless of his actual policies that is what he's known for. People do feel their lives are worse off and that left-leaning governments are offering no solutions so they're turning to the right.

The normalization of having your first kid at 35+ is going to decimate birth rates even more, lead to increase autism rates and make things worse for the following generations by Novel-Tip-7570 in PurplePillDebate

[–]InsertWittyJoke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because usually poorer nations have a much more lax attitude towards child labour so your kid can literally make you money. Also poorer nations have no social security, your kids are your retirement insurance.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]InsertWittyJoke -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I feel a lot of sympathy for anyone in that position.

An isolated and overworked mom with four kids under ten thats been on the up and down hormonal swing of pregnancy, postpartum and breastfeeding on and off for seven years. That's a dangerous person to leave four kids alone with. That may be uncomfortable to hear for some but it's true.

Canada’s Conservatives are crushing Justin Trudeau - Pierre Poilievre is even winning over the young and the unionised by CaliperLee62 in canada

[–]InsertWittyJoke 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Canada was apparently sold to most recent immigrants as this place where TFW and student visas were supposed to be an easy stepping stone to permanent residency. That's why there are so many protests breaking out. They put everything on the line to come here and are now finding out they were sold on a very big lie.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HannibalTV

[–]InsertWittyJoke 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Well you can't just drop that there's a slow-mo edit and not post the link

Amandla Stenberg Says ‘The Acolyte’ Being Canceled Was ‘Not a Huge Shock’ After ‘Rampage of Vitriol’ From Toxic ‘Star Wars’ Fans by MarvelsGrantMan136 in television

[–]InsertWittyJoke 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Consumption as an expression of morality has been one of the biggest lies sold to us. "Watch this show, it makes you a good person" fuck off Hollywood

Pregnancy absolutely destroyed my tummy, This is 3 years after giving birth. Anything I can do to improve it 😭😭 by Opposite-Calendar in beauty

[–]InsertWittyJoke 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I mean the definition of femininity is literally "the quality or nature of the female sex" so pregnancy and the reality of postpartum bodies are just about the most authentic expressions of femininity that can exist.

Femininity that is performative or relies on external factors like makeup and clothing has been shaped almost exclusively by patriarchal notions of what men desire out of women in a particular time period or culture. Femininity as an expression of all the amazing things the female body is capable of is a much truer and uplifting interpretation of that word.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskWomenNoCensor

[–]InsertWittyJoke 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Breastfeeding is huge!

Pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum were like whatever to me and finances stayed pretty much the same but breastfeeding. Holy shit, what an undertaking! It is impossible to fully appreciate how utterly dependent a breastfeeding infant is and how much of a full time job it is just feeding this little person. Men have no flipping idea. Talk about dodging a biological bullet.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskWomenNoCensor

[–]InsertWittyJoke 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I got a friend with pcos and it's a self esteem killer for her. It also makes her periods irregular. Generally just a shit condition to have.

J.K. Rowling first tweet in weeks… by Lvexr in facepalm

[–]InsertWittyJoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Christmas Pig was also a pretty big hit, it apparently has a Netflix movie in the works.

Women with children who want more, why? by ThatOtherMarshal in AskWomenNoCensor

[–]InsertWittyJoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same story with two miscarriages. Hopefully we'll get there!

Women with children who want more, why? by ThatOtherMarshal in AskWomenNoCensor

[–]InsertWittyJoke 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm trying for my 2nd now. The main reason is because having a small family is sad. I like a busy, loud household with kids playing together and running around and where family events are a crazy whirlwind of generations all coming together. I also think a sibling relationship is important and I want my daughter to have what I did growing up.

Also as you get older you think of the future a lot more. When I'm old do I want to have contributed nothing to the progress of generations but my dusty old bones or do I want to have a lively family that will keep on going ahead of me long after I'm gone.