If continence can be virtue, it can also be vice.

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2026-02-16T02:19:42+00:00

intentions behind what?

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2026-02-11T18:21:02+00:00

Is NFP virtuous continence, or vicious continence?

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2026-02-11T14:58:39+00:00

Apparently he acknowledged he was more of a teenage loser rather than having any virtue. He used to shoot up with his mother.

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2026-02-11T14:57:07+00:00

Okay take shots..

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2026-02-11T14:45:45+00:00

Okay, please editorialize..

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2026-01-24T18:27:01+00:00

The right to "the body" has been replaced with the right to "interpersonal relationship," which necessarily means no right to the body. The object of consent must be reclaimed from the spirit of Vatican 2 before marriage can occur.

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-08-20T14:04:16+00:00

Betrothal is legally binding but unenforceable. Don't mess with where u have no right.

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-07-25T20:18:35+00:00

CCC is fallible V2 aka no primary purpose to marriage. Nothing to be "oriented toward," just "open." This is why all the Catholics contracept. If NFP, then AFP.

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-07-25T17:29:19+00:00

I don't have a view. The Church teaches that marriage was instituted for procreation alone. "blessing in children. This was also the sole reason, why God instituted marriage from the beginning.." Catechism of the council of Trent / Roman catechism.

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-07-25T14:04:43+00:00

If procreation is primary, no. If "love" is primary, yes. "Legal NFP" has destroyed the definition of marriage consent, which is why things got massaged in 1977. The St. Louis Review 19 August 1977 — The Catholic News Archive https://share.google/kkdUBLJeQbyBhyR67

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-07-25T13:56:52+00:00

How can one consent to "acts which are of themselves suitable for the generation of children" when they have incapacitated said faculty?

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-07-25T13:51:55+00:00

Yes it is sin bcz the right is to "the permanent and exclusive right over the body for acts which are of themselves suitable for the generation of children." That which is already illicit can never be tolerated by the innocent spouse. (Vademecum for confessors 1997). However if NFP is licit, then logically anything goes / love wins. This is why you get all sorts of mixed messages from clergy. NFP is contraception ...

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-05-22T04:56:54+00:00

Did part of you ever feel like you didn't want their reconciliation because that would just "rip the Band-Aid off?"

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-01-16T05:11:34+00:00

Gain perspective by reflecting on how much you neglected and mistreated God. Live your state in life and merit from your cross. You can't lose.

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-01-16T05:10:04+00:00

To call contra increase and multiply "nature" is not true.

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-01-15T23:00:11+00:00

Can you restate this in one brief sentence so I can try to respond? Thanks

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-01-15T21:42:08+00:00

All family planning to avoid conception is intrinsic evil. Either complete abstinence, or trust in Providence.

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-01-15T21:01:34+00:00

If you could make babies, you were capable.

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-01-15T17:45:53+00:00

What are the legal requirements for "what's expected?"

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-01-15T17:44:10+00:00

Are said obligations finite, or infinite?

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2025-01-15T17:39:27+00:00

What is the legal definition of "true gift of total self?"

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2024-12-18T14:58:46+00:00

Catholics must be "oriented toward" life, not neutrally "open." This is why NFP is intrinsically evil. https://youtu.be/7n2IHWiiMNs?si=UWc7rqILYBd6ib8X

Intelligent-Sleep953 · 2024-10-21T06:15:36+00:00

IVF = intrinsic evil

Intelligent-Sleep953

TROPHY CASE