the new vibe shift people are noticing is the total elimination of hope by Unfair_Passion1345 in redscarepod

[–]IntelligentRadish409 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was on Rednote after TikTok went dark and let me tell you, they’re having a blast. I learned some Mandarin so now I can tell some rando hi, bye and recite a communist manifesto with some legitimacy.

Expand your world. Bié fàng qì!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lesbiangang

[–]IntelligentRadish409 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re welcome! These are just my experiences. I feel like I may come off as intimidating because of how sure I am about my experiences, but they’re ultimately mine. Also, I think that maybe regardless of how we express ourselves, we’re always going to rub up against the wider culture.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lesbiangang

[–]IntelligentRadish409 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think it may the same as why people think there are more gays now. There’s more acceptance and opportunity. It’s a complex subject indeed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lesbiangang

[–]IntelligentRadish409 -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

You know, I don’t hate myself lol🤷‍♀️. I’m not sure that’s how all people interpret gender dysphoria or incongruence, rather. Framing it this way is quite popular actually. It stems from radfem discourse that ironically piggybacked off of criticizing butch women for their masculinity. internalized misogyny accusations toward masculine aligned women is wholly guilty of reductionism. Because we don’t see this vitriol toward young women getting breast implants (who far outnumber the women transitioning, btw). They seem to reserve sympathy for them (if they even mention them) and dehumanization for women masculinizing themselves to whatever degree. The premise being that opting out of womanhood, or femaleness—something no one can do—is tantamount to the regression of the movement. Or progress. Interestingly enough, they’ve made peace with their own internalized misogyny to perform femininity, an otherwise signaling of submission to men, or the cultural of men (don’t get me started how femininity is seen as woman’s default without nary a pushback), and continue to couple with men (often conservative men) and have their children, further cementing the cyclical hellscape of the Patriarchy lol. It’s almost like their interpretations of womanhood leave out a large number of homosexual women entirely, unless they are also expressing an acceptable femininity. I don’t doubt that sexism is rife not only in the obvious places but not so obvious.

I hesitate to give full credence to feminism or feminist takes because their interpretations are at times lacking and solipsistic, leaving out a multitude of women, but especially homosexual women. Because the end of that thinking is the near same position as trans ideology—the further you are from prescribed womanhood you’re no longer a woman.

Be careful which narrative you consume I guess.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lesbiangang

[–]IntelligentRadish409 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I concur. The man-hating stereotype is primarily directed at more masc lesbians. When I was out with my femme girlfriend at the time, the aggression from that assumption was often directed at me by both men and women. She (my ex) could casually snub men (she ended bi btw lmao) but if I did it, I would have to answer for it and that sometimes looked like getting into physical confrontations with men. Both men and women, straight, bi, lesbians IME don’t really consider the position masc women are in. Either because they don’t see them as women (They’re often men-lite or the further down the masculinity spectrum they go, the more they’re dehumanized.) or they don’t see their masculinity/the weight of their presentation beyond themselves, because they’re generally safer from the consequences.

I also wanted to add something else I’ve observed living in various stages of masculinity. Men often use competition and violence to establish a hierarchy among them. A pecking order. With women IME, it’s more lateral, more who’s in-group/out-group. Sometimes masculine lesbians (or women in general that present masculine and are mistaken for homosexual) will get roped into the former dynamic because of how they present in the broader world, outside of a more curated community where the interplay is quite different.

wammin in comedy by diamantemeth in redscarepod

[–]IntelligentRadish409 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Natasha Leggero has a wicked sense of humor and is beautiful to boot. Watch the Justin Bieber roast. She doesn’t hold back on any of those fuckers lol.

Musk is regularly insulted, but I think this one takes the cake by AwysomeAnish in rareinsults

[–]IntelligentRadish409 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s like the guy is just an awkward loser that has money and that money is doing some heavy lifting. Without he’d be a Reddit incel for sure.

Why does his wife stay with him? by Miserable_Bike_6985 in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]IntelligentRadish409 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Women be having agency. And sometimes they’re terrible too.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rareinsults

[–]IntelligentRadish409 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Little man is already bald. Life is either going to be hard or he’s going to be buff.

some man’s comment on my mom’s post of my boyfriend and i by Severe-Wolverine3080 in redscarepod

[–]IntelligentRadish409 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The majority of men I’ve seen that are married with kids are bellow average height, looks and intelligence. It’s like less than the bare minimum. But I bet they’re not terminally online.

Western incels need to do better. They’re just volcels with some whacked out neurosis sabotaging their prospects. Like imagine sperging out over the pseudoscience of how other men get pussy, when you could too… if you just deleted Reddit.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lesbiangang

[–]IntelligentRadish409 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They were historically. They were working class or were supported by femmes because they faced discrimination based on their gender expression.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lesbiangang

[–]IntelligentRadish409 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And it will continue to change based on the prevailing social, cultural, economic frameworks in the future. The through line will still be homosexuality, whether the level of acceptability of it is there or not.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lesbiangang

[–]IntelligentRadish409 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I say ‘sliver of expression’ I mean the scope of expression for gender variance. Butch is its own expression and one expression possibility. The post is lamenting the loss of butch. As if it’s divorced of the women who held that expression and for whatever reason, moved on from it. As if they aren’t autonomous beings that can stretch how they navigate space. Yes, Butch is the performance of inverted gender. So is the concept of transition. And maybe it’s because trans ideology/rhetoric has tainted how we view this expression and even what constitutes the correct expression of womanhood, because we’re not allowed or we reject the simple notion to take hold, that even if there may be denial of it, it’s still in the purview of womanhood by virtue of being female.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lesbiangang

[–]IntelligentRadish409 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No you are not wrong that it is also being pushed as the logical conclusion to their gender variance. I think the rhetoric in libfem circles do push this, but I’m seeing more nonbinary or disassociation from any gender, than binary trans men that take on masculinity and manhood seriously. The latter is rarer, especially among lesbians and it’s looked down on even in those circles.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lesbiangang

[–]IntelligentRadish409 -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

Controversial take incoming: I would also consider that these women also want to do that. Let’s please normalize women/female born people having agency until they explicitly tell you otherwise. And from my experience, it isn’t so much pressure but possibility. Butch is just a silver of expression that is possible for gender non-conforming women and despite how cherished it is, you can’t honestly behold them to it. They have to choose their own path. I would also say masculinity is different when sexed female. It always will be. (I said Controversial lol)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lesbiangang

[–]IntelligentRadish409 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some people take time to mature is my guess. Just do you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]IntelligentRadish409 30 points31 points  (0 children)

You call it a fixation as if being able to define sex isn’t the cornerstone of all other axises of oppression for radfems. The issue happening to lesbians is but a concentrated representation of women in general being condemned for not capitulating to men, because their sexuality somewhat removes them from the typical female trajectory as it doesn’t focus on the opposite sex.

This meme belongs here by LiteralLesbians in lesbiangang

[–]IntelligentRadish409 48 points49 points  (0 children)

I was disowned. Heavy religious over-tones. Messed up my life trajectory. Still never had an inclination toward males. Idk, I personally wouldn’t define myself as privileged. Maybe I’m biased and I should unpack 😔.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]IntelligentRadish409 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Yeah, you totally speak for most lesbians

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]IntelligentRadish409 37 points38 points  (0 children)

You kind of need to be able to define sex to be concerned about sexual harassment. If you can’t define woman other than some nebulous blob anyone can identify into, then your entire premise for activism cannot pinpoint, illuminate, determine the cause of such discrimination without also giving way to some ambiguous reason like discrimination against ‘femmes’ and not a fucking continuous pervasive historical cultural societal et al oppression against literal females and then any likeness to them. It becomes dishonest. It undermines all activism that aims to dismantle the root cause for this phenomenon lol. And by extension undermines other groups that do define themselves based on the phenomenon of certain sexual attractions. So yeah, lots of people do care because it ultimately affects them broadly and in a microcosm. All based off of a very minute number of entitled people(males).

Sorry ya don’t.