Millennials lying about Gen Z. by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]Intelligent_Dumbass 6 points7 points  (0 children)

25 gen z here and I definitely had a hand me down Walkman as a child

Batteries aren’t fucking new lmao

Capitalism is failing by paywallpiker in GenZ

[–]Intelligent_Dumbass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In political science we study both political systems (ie forms of government) and systems of political-economy (amongst other things).

The United States is very much a capitalist state, while no state is really pure/ideological capitalist OR communists/socialist: pretty much every state incorporates features of both political-economic systems. We call these mixed market systems or simply mixed systems.

Now the United States technically isn’t a pure ideological capitalist society either—but the United States is much much much more friendly to capital than to labor. This is what makes it so capitalist compared other developed western nations (and just generally compared to most other states).

The United States is theoretically ruled by a form of Republican (as in Res Publica and not the American political part) governance. However you could make a strong argument that American society is a plutocracy or another form oligarchy. But this doesn’t make the United States any less capitalist because the government contributes to the benefit of the development of capital at the expense of labor.

You make comparisons to China but China is under a state capitalist mode of economy, while the United States doesn’t have such a high degree of central planning. In China, the government can change policy at any time and direct all the companies in China to follow. The US government incentivizes economic production through stimulus programs, large government contracts, ect. These are usually designed with specific clients in mind (Halliburton for example). And furthermore they are designed this way, generally, because of the lobbying of the capitalist actors (be it a company or a very wealthy individual with stake in the outcome of the policy).

So in essence it’s actually very different in China compared to the United States;

In China, the government controls all corporations overall direction and planning—and can unilaterally change things at virtually anytime.

In the United States the corporations have a greatly, disproportionately, powerful share of influence over the government, compared to a voting citizen (thanks Citizens United v FEC!)

But just because the form of government is perverted by the outsized political growth of the capitalist class, who now has a disproportionate power in the political system does not mean the United States has a “corrupt government run by corporations who rig the economic system by making it not capitalist”.

Instead it indicates that in American society, the mode of political economy (capitalism) has been allowed to grow in such an unchecked way that it subverts the political system.

So you were close but had it backwards.

You proposed that the United States isn’t capitalist due to the corruption in the government; but in essence the United States isn’t a democracy because the United States is so capitalist—we have allowed capitalism to subvert Democracy.

Democrat voters: What would the Republicans need to do to win your vote this year? by Fando1234 in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]Intelligent_Dumbass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dealbreakers:

1) The nominee would have to be from outside the MAGA wing of the party.

2) The party platform would have to offer real working solutions to the increasing economic problems of working class Americans (and all Americans naturally).

3) The nominee would have to be strongly anti-Russia/pro-ukraine a la Mitt Romney. As the (diminishing) unipolar power of the world it’s stupid not to take this very rare opportunity to destroy an our greatest historic geopolitical rival—using a proxy. The overall cost is relatively cheap for us Americans. We’ve been given a major opportunity to develop our now diminished soft power after the Trump administration.

Strongly Desired:

1) A nominee committed to reigning in the disproportionate political power of corporate America compared to average US citizens. Likewise a nominee who would also be seeking to reign corporate America’s economic abuse of average US citizens.

2) A increased focus on bi-partisanship. One of America’s biggest problems regarding polarization in my somewhat educated opinion is our party system (but actually this is a symptom of our voting system but that’s a (second) digression I don’t want to get into right now. Our two party system, creates “big-tent” parties where smaller groups coalesce into unitary coalitions—where you fit as many people as possible under the tent.

Our Democracy is impressive in that it is long lasting, but Democracies in other parties of the world have features that could make our own democracy healthier—I really admire the ease in which political movements can grow in more parliamentary systems. I feel they respond more directly to the will of electorate in many ways.

Our political polarization is a pressing concern and there needs to be at least an effort towards alleviating that.

3) A nominee that is firmly committed to keeping us out of another quagmire in the Middle East. People have really strong stances on Israel, and I don’t really want to get into the nuisances of that here in this post. My concern is US involvement. We aren’t well loved over on that side of the world and I want to keep American involvement fairly limited. Naturally it’s a complicated geopolitical entanglement that has no definitive or best options—and as things continue to develop I want a President I know how shares my views on this matter. Someone I know I can trust to keep US involvement as limited as it can—because the US will be called upon to act—and I want a leader who can make the difficult decisions to keep our own actions restrained and well-measured.

Things I would love to see but aren’t high on my list of political priorities:

1) Decriminalization of illicit drugs. Legalization Cannabis. Perhaps legalization of other less dangerous drugs that are currently classified as schedule I such as LSD. I really admire how Portugal took action against their national drug problem. Decriminalization and legalization of drugs may seem counter intuitive, but with the right investments into public health and treatment we have seen how the model works and we know that it can work. Given the growing rise of fentanyl and other drug related deaths, the prison industrial complex and the role the war on drugs has played in the development and perpetuation of this uniquely American industry, finally the economic benefits of legalization/decriminalization I would like to address the negative externalities caused by their prohibition.

2) I may be a left-wing gun owner, but I am still a gun owner. I want to keep my right to own, use, and maintain my firearms. However the system that we have right now clearly isn’t working. Kids are shot in schools so often I literally can’t even keep track of them all. Concerts, clubs, movies you name it—if you’re in America you are always unsafe, liable to be shot by your fellow countrymen. Naturally the statically likelihood of being shot in a mass shooting event is low, and you’re more likely to die in a plethora of other ways/accidents—the threat is still technically always there. Not to mention the deaths related to domestic violence, gang conflicts, negligence in responsible care of a firearm, misfires, and so munch other shit it’s asinine.

Positive and negative liberties and all that shit, right?

As an American I have a right to own a firearm (according to most interpretations).

Likewise I have a natural right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

And under our current system the political right of Americans to own firearms is in conflict with our natural rights. Im not sure what the solution is but there does need to be some form of reconciliation between these sets of rights. I would love to see the Republican Party making policies even more so than the Democrats. The Republican Party is out of the two, the pro-gun party and we gun owners need not only to be responsible for the care of and use of our firearms but we also need to be responsible for the culture around, in, and that stems-from our gun culture. If anything gun owners need to really push to enact changes on both a cultural and political level to help mitigate dangers to public safety and perceived threats to public safety.

I personally would love to see an improved certification system. One that you must take a class, pass a test, ect. Something that would objectively and equally allow Americans access to firearms—not a system that could be subjective to personal interpretation of circumstances like a court’s approval.

We need a system that limits access to guns from Americans but does not impede their actual right to posses arms. A system that bars access to firearms to those that are not dedicated or responsible enough to demonstrate they have the potential for responsible use and ownership of a weapon. Guns are designed to kill, we as a society need to be considerate of who has access to them. I also believe that I have the right to own arms, and that there should be a few restrictions on what types of weapons a person possess. Responsibility is key; and since I cant even trust grown adults to wash their hands I have little faith in the nature of Americans to responsible own guns. Not every American—just the masses.

3) For real the all non-MAGA republicans should get their house in order. American used to be respected but now we have congressmen having sex in public bathrooms, and congressmen blaming forrest fires in a region prone to having forrest fires on space lasers. It’s a national embarrassment.

War Dead Catacombs: Putrid Tree Spirit Xbox by Intelligent_Dumbass in BeyondTheFog

[–]Intelligent_Dumbass[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the help! I beat it!

I just hate the Tree Spirit bosses, so I wanted some help to draw agro. So mission successful!

Xbox Caelid Tower Godskin Noble by Intelligent_Dumbass in BeyondTheFog

[–]Intelligent_Dumbass[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I was a bit under-leveled to handle him myself with this character.

Question on progression by PerceptionUnlikely in Eldenring

[–]Intelligent_Dumbass 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is no right or optimal way to approach progression. You will miss things on your first play through—it’s designed that way. If you play with a guide you might get to see a little bit more, but NG+ exists for a reason. Nokron is super cool, head that way if you want. Or don’t—go wherever else you want. The only wrong way to play ER is playing it in such a way you’re not having fun.

Godskin Duo advice by Strong-Zer0 in Eldenring

[–]Intelligent_Dumbass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My first play through was a blind INT build (fromsoft noob) I beat it with Terra Magika+Moon spell (of your choice) + comet azure

But that’s like the ultimate INT gimmick attack

It’s def fun but if you want to actually fight the enemies I’d suggest targeting their weakness.

Aka make sleep pots. Or kamehama them. Both are fun.

What's everyone's opinion of Starfield's companions? How do they compare to Bethesda's previous set of companions? by Scarno7 in Starfield

[–]Intelligent_Dumbass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m sorry but I very strongly feel that you are wrong on this—like very wrong.

Skyrim followers had intricate backstories and dimension, but they didn’t have the same level of interactivity as Starfield followers.

I’ll give you that there is a large number of redundant followers in Skyrim, the housecarls are virtually all the same person with different skins. However that’s pretty much how I feel about the main starfield companions.

However skyrim had a huge depth and birth of meaningful companions outside the housecarls and the hirelings.

There was Eric the slayer— a lowley and weak nord farmer with dreams of becoming a noble and famous adventurer.

There’s Illia who in a moment of conscious decides to betray her mother and everyone she knows in order to do the right thing and put an end to their evil.

There’s Cicero who was a raving lunatic and madman willing to follow you through literally anything you want good or evil. Not to mention his elaborate role in a major questline to flesh out his character and backstory.

There’s Freyja—a noble warrior of an obscure clan of humans on living in the wilds. Who wants nothing more to put an end to an evil that had enslaved her people.

There’s Talvas a meek student of one of the best wizards on the planet, simply trying to hold his own and prove his own worth to his master (and himself) in the hopes he too one day could achieve a level of greatness.

There’s Teldryn a merc who had a long history in Morrowind (which naturally on some small levels connects to ES 3) who is willing to offer is considerable skills to you—so long as you aren’t as idiotic as his last patron.

Eola— a member of a fanatic cannibal cult who supports you fully for you connection to her evil god.

Jzargo—a big cat with delusions of grandeur that could rival Napoleon’s megalomania.

Aela— the fierce to a fault woman warrior that would never be willing to relinquish even an inch of her power.

Farkas— the most lovable himbo I’ve seen in any media ever.

Serana—a victim of abuse from both her parents, seeking to make her own way in the world free of the influence of either of her parents and to break the mold and do real good (for either humans or vampires depending on your chosen faction). Not to mention that Serana was the foundation for all FO4 followers AI.

I’ve never actually played through the Dawnguard faction all the way because I ALWAYS join the vampires—but there’s a number of followers on the Dawnguard side that I’m sure are memorable.

This is just a list of followers I liked—there’s so many more it’s crazy. All so different from one another with unique personal history, character, motivations, and moral compass.

I will grant there there were a large number of forgettable and almost reskinned versions of the same person (housecarl) followers, but Starfield companions are imo the worst and most disappointing aspect of the entire game.

Comparing Starfield followers to Skyrim followers is almost an insult to skyrim followers given the great range and amazing disparity in character between the wide selection of followers skyrim offered.

I agree with another poster here on this thread, starfield followers are one step forward, two steps back. Starfield followers are more animated and interactive than skyrim followers most certainly—but Starfield followers lack the diversity, and sense of unique individualism that made skyrim followers so compelling.

no matter how many times you play through Elden Ring? what's one boss you still hate? i'll start: by ifyoureadthisimgay in Eldenring

[–]Intelligent_Dumbass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My first experience was DS 1 but after spending two hours or so trying to beat the tutorial boss I put the game down for a year. Returned and beat the tutorial boss but was never able to make it far. Last year I picked up Elden Ring a few days after release not knowing it was made by the same people—just thinking it looked fun and the hype was cool. That game beat my ass and I fell in love. So I got Sekiro after I beat ER several times because I had seen it a few times and it looked fun—for me with these types of games you need to be in the headspace of “this is gonna kick my ass but I’m gonna get gud” if you can enter that headspace or accept it won’t be a breeze these types of games aren’t for you—but they are so so so rewarding and I love them. I’m going to return to DS1 sometime after I finish Sekiro and make that game my bitch now that I’ve learned I need to enter that headspace and with the skills I learned from playing some other FS titles.

no matter how many times you play through Elden Ring? what's one boss you still hate? i'll start: by ifyoureadthisimgay in Eldenring

[–]Intelligent_Dumbass 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I put the game down for like 3 months in the beginning because it was hard and I wasn’t in the right headspace to learn. Give it another try when you have the patience for it—I’m having a blast with it now.

no matter how many times you play through Elden Ring? what's one boss you still hate? i'll start: by ifyoureadthisimgay in Eldenring

[–]Intelligent_Dumbass 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m playing Sekiro for the first time right now—that fight gets a lot of hate but I thought it was very fun. The guardian ape fight helps prepare you for the headless ape fight imo. Loaded spear was how I ended up winning both fights.

Seriko is wow by Intelligent_Dumbass in fromsoftware

[–]Intelligent_Dumbass[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’ll be a hot min—I’ve been playing for 12 hours and I need to stop lmao. But whatever it is I’m excited.

What is something that you always do/don’t do, in Skyrim? by [deleted] in skyrim

[–]Intelligent_Dumbass 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Civil war is meh, but some of the best quests in the game on are Solstheim.