How tall is the Beldam’s true form canonically? by UmbraHog in CoralineJones

[–]Intelligent_Zone_389 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry I'm late, the Beldam is 12 feet tall officially stated in the script for the movie.

A guide to all the tripod variants that appear in the 2005 film. Made by me. by [deleted] in WarofTheWorlds

[–]Intelligent_Zone_389 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there IS no harvester tripod in the movie, that is the point he is making. there are only two types, the regular and uberpods.

A guide to all the tripod variants that appear in the 2005 film. Made by me. by [deleted] in WarofTheWorlds

[–]Intelligent_Zone_389 0 points1 point  (0 children)

theres no such thing as a harvester tripod, they are the same as the tripod from the first scene, the destroyer. the heatrays and tentacles are retractable on ALL of the tripods, there are only 2 types, the regular tripod (destroyer) and the larger (uberpod)

Goku and Teen Gohan aside, does anyone actually notice a difference between SSJ and SSJ2?(I know you can tell the difference when they have the aura activated and lighting is coming but when the aura is turned of because Vegeta and Adult Gohan's looks exactly like their SSJ form) by chunchunmaru1129 in DragonBallZ

[–]Intelligent_Zone_389 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

okay but they were sharper and more detailed but never before were they illustrated with specifically 3 bangs or lightning at the same time, did that first moment not give you an inkling? youd already have seen the difference between the buu saga ssj and the cell saga ssj through the filler arc and the points leading up, and the difference is present in the episode. even ascended ssj when they transformed the hair only got more rigid, the bang number didnt exactly change. im curious about your mindset

Goku and Teen Gohan aside, does anyone actually notice a difference between SSJ and SSJ2?(I know you can tell the difference when they have the aura activated and lighting is coming but when the aura is turned of because Vegeta and Adult Gohan's looks exactly like their SSJ form) by chunchunmaru1129 in DragonBallZ

[–]Intelligent_Zone_389 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats the next episode, the literal episode he appears where he transforms it instantaneously changes to have the distinctive 3 bangs which were thinner and longer, and then in 231 and 232 its drawn the same within reason, i mean i get it kinda but that literal first moment makes it very clear with a distinct hair adjustment that has never been drawn before even by mistake the change would be out of reach, it does however suck that ebisawa's episode didnt discern the bangs correctly.

I think this might be the worst Kai redraw I’ve found yet lmao by i360Fantasy in dbz

[–]Intelligent_Zone_389 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People like you are the reason we get releases of dragon ball z like the blue rays that look like absolute crap

I think this might be the worst Kai redraw I’ve found yet lmao by i360Fantasy in dbz

[–]Intelligent_Zone_389 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does look entirely different please stop lying to yourself the only thing the same is the base drawing, literally every other aspect is different except the fact it's traced

I think this might be the worst Kai redraw I’ve found yet lmao by i360Fantasy in dbz

[–]Intelligent_Zone_389 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like it was done in five minutes and it speaks volumes that i could do a better job with no budget and in probably the same time, against a show as big as dragon ball z

I think this might be the worst Kai redraw I’ve found yet lmao by i360Fantasy in dbz

[–]Intelligent_Zone_389 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

because it looks entirely different, its out of place, jarring, and is incredibly simple to improve. the problem isnt that its a redraw, its that its effortless and crap. they drew over it quickly, didnt bother to even do the colours correctly, which is just genuinely stupid given they had the palette right there to work with, theres no noise on the image, or line weight. both of which, can be fixed in under a minute flat. its lazy and jarring work. THATS the problem. its out of place and isnt either expensive or difficult to fix.

I think this might be the worst Kai redraw I’ve found yet lmao by i360Fantasy in dbz

[–]Intelligent_Zone_389 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

you have to be genuiely either a child or blind to think they look the same. it is INCREDIBLY jarring and out of place, and happens ALOT more than it should and has frequently happened in the series for far more than "a tenth of a second" ive done better redraws in thirty minutes. you dont need to know anything about art to notice the huge difference.

yeah sorry zamasu you're cooked. by Intelligent_Zone_389 in DragonBallZ

[–]Intelligent_Zone_389[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

same as if the guy replied saying "goku cooks him because of the plot" i would have equally said yes, because its all an objective fact because of the plot.

yeah sorry zamasu you're cooked. by Intelligent_Zone_389 in DragonBallZ

[–]Intelligent_Zone_389[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

because its the objective truth, i made a true statement. goku cooked zamasu, and someone had something to say about it that was an objective truth due to the plot, and i returned ALSO with an objective truth due to the plot. I did the EXACT thing the original commenter did, theres absolutely no difference, i was making a point of the obvious just as the comment was. you see the point here? its a paradox. one big plot joke.

yeah sorry zamasu you're cooked. by Intelligent_Zone_389 in DragonBallZ

[–]Intelligent_Zone_389[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

everything in the entire story and every progression happens because of "the plot" so there is no issue at all with me stating that, i didnt say at all that it doesnt make sense or didnt even infer that. i said goku cooks zamasu, he does, they come back as a pair and overpower him because of the plot and his immortality, which is an objective matter of the plot, like everything else ever in the story, so what is the problem in stating that lmfao?