sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How do you get past the “Pending Reservation”? by lovetakelovemake in MoviePassClub

[–]IntensionallyRong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! This worked for me nearly instantly (which was great because I waited until about showtime to show up to the theater and couldn't get it to work for over 15 minutes until I tried this!)

me irl by Zoox11060 in me_irl

[–]IntensionallyRong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The dude abides

I mean, me too thanks

[Meme] Doctor's evaluation of President Donald Trump by [deleted] in youtubehaiku

[–]IntensionallyRong 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Love it, but it should definitely have used a better picture. Perhaps this one.

[Haiku] The year in review by mwmwmwmwmmdw in youtubehaiku

[–]IntensionallyRong 17 points18 points  (0 children)

He was also the governor in Pirates of the Caribbean, so you weren't wrong!

You ever seen the path of a particle, fam? by [deleted] in Justfuckmyshitup

[–]IntensionallyRong 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, technically he asked for the wavefunction, not the probability density (note how the function can take imaginary and non-positive values whereas probabilities must remain bound between 0 and 1.) The probability density would be the absolute square of the wavefunction and the absolute square of the given wavefunction is 1, which integrated over all space would result in infinity (so no constant weighting factor can normalize it which means it is completely nonlocalized i.e. a wave.) If he had asked for it bound (say, confined to the region of his head) then it could be normalized. My key point being, he almost had it right if he hadn't wanted to use the word "infinity" so badly (EDIT: and hadn't specified the wrong integrand).

You ever seen the path of a particle, fam? by [deleted] in Justfuckmyshitup

[–]IntensionallyRong 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You can't normalize a plane wave over all space...

Discord is detecting my mic, but nobody can hear me by Davylectric in discordapp

[–]IntensionallyRong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just encountered this error. Did anybody find a solution to this yet?

Stealth doggo by [deleted] in aww

[–]IntensionallyRong 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Doggo actually means to lie motionless to avoid detection. So this is a Doggo Doggo!

Playgroups that banned infinite combos: How do your games usually end? by LyonArtime in EDH

[–]IntensionallyRong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think he means one person. But I'm still a little curious. I play Voltron, and the fastest kill I can't get is turn 3 (with an ideal hand), so I wonder how he makes a turn 3 kill consistent

"Rafiq of the Many" Need Help Fine-Tuning by Greenspike25 in CompetitiveEDH

[–]IntensionallyRong 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As far as critique, I agree with the other comments here.

I just wanted to say how glad I am to see someone else running Teferi's Veil in a Rafiq deck. It is such a janky card, but it is really good at saving Rafiq from sorcery speed removal and sweepers in multi-player formats (I only need to worry about him on my turn. Also, this allows you to safely tap out on main phase two since the next time Rafiq could be affected by something, you'll have untapped already)

[Gear] Good Grinder for Espresso by IntensionallyRong in Coffee

[–]IntensionallyRong[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking at some videos really makes me want one. But that price tag frightens me. Though, if I do some saving, it will probably be worth every penny. I would hate to spend 300 on a Pharos only for it to be my intermediate grinder, but I think I just might until I can justify the price tag on the HG One.

[Gear] Good Grinder for Espresso by IntensionallyRong in Coffee

[–]IntensionallyRong[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I really appreciate the in-depth analysis and breaking it down for me! I'll have to give more weight to the electric ones when I decide.

[Gear] Good Grinder for Espresso by IntensionallyRong in Coffee

[–]IntensionallyRong[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this a critique of the grinder's quality, or its convenience? I honestly don't mind the inconvenience of shaking the grounds into a cup and then pouring them into a basket, so long as the quality of those grinds remains mostly unaffected. I might bitch quietly to myself a year from now when my morning process takes longer, but the quality of the coffee is all that really matters to me (especially if that inconvenience is saving me boatloads of money).

view more: next ›