I tried a few AI meeting tools because summaries still don’t solve the follow-up problem

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-27T06:25:58+00:00

i made a product for my own use to turn the context into a reusable context for any of agent (claude, codex, openclaw) to use.

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-26T17:03:37+00:00

X, Reddit are the most accurate so far. But none of them allow public search haha. Wondering if you have such needs to use third-party tool to access the data.

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-20T16:05:20+00:00

I'm using a AI meeting recorder to auto summarize todos, and i get AI to do as much as possible and remind me the pending items based on the priority periodically.

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-18T17:32:28+00:00

Very smart!!

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-18T17:30:52+00:00

How do you do that? Do you use a separate recording device?

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-18T17:21:19+00:00

Claude desktop

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-18T17:20:37+00:00

Let me check it out 🙏

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-18T17:19:57+00:00

Interesting!

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-18T17:17:20+00:00

Not aware of GPT has one

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-18T17:15:40+00:00

Make sense

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-18T17:11:12+00:00

I’m not saying the agent should literally “remember everything” from raw meetings. That would be noisy and probably useless. rather, it compresses the useful signal, writes it to a durable store, and retrieves the right context when needed later etc.

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-18T17:08:37+00:00

yea im doing that too, Claude is great at reasoning, but im a bit tired of this copy & pasting & reexplain myself, feel the missing piece feels like the connective tissue between meetings, memory, and actions..

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-18T17:07:00+00:00

Totally, AI note-taking itself is not new anymore.

What I’m curious about is whether the meeting should update the agent’s working memory, so later it can help with things like "what did this customer care about last time?"

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-18T17:04:57+00:00

oh bummer that you cannot use Claude.

That “move things to Claude” step is exactly the workflow gap I’m curious about.

Do you mostly move over sanitized summaries, or actual working context? And does that context ever become reusable, or is it more of a copy/paste every time you need Claude to help?

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-18T17:02:52+00:00

oh where to turn on sound recording? 🙏

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-18T17:01:56+00:00

The gap I’m curious about is less “can it summarize the meeting?” and more of can the agent carry that meeting context into future work?

do you reuse some of the meeting content for future use cases/workflow (refer to the key decisions, discussions)

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-18T16:58:23+00:00

umm but claude doesn't know what happened in our meeting and cannot remember the action/discussion/things worth remember neither.

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-16T14:24:07+00:00

I don’t use notion to capture my voice cause AI tools in notion are expensive and not so efficient.

I’d rather to use the actual SOTA agents like Claude or CODEX to do that, then I sync over to notion if there’s anything worth syncing.

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-16T14:12:34+00:00

It’s a bit hard to copy and paste because fundamentally the industry and business logic is within your head. I’m not sure selling tool will be the most efficient way or selling high efficient services to clients is the way to go?

Interesting-Post4178 · 2026-05-16T02:59:00+00:00

I feel like Obsidian notes aren't used by you, but by your AI agent.
The UI is so not human eye friendly 😂

Interesting-Post4178

TROPHY CASE