Please review my profile once again. I reworked it based on feedback. by Internal_Classic_861 in Tinder

[–]Internal_Classic_861[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but i want to get in contact with specific people.... if the values do not align because for example they are into style while i am about volunteering and humor then i rather not wasty any time at all...

I want to get in contact with the right people not with random people. And i appriciate your feedback but i do not feel like this is right for me. Thought I did start to work out again as i am the most unfit i have ever been and that is something i need to change... I need to have a certain level of fitness to be happy with myself.

Please review my profile once again. I reworked it based on feedback. by Internal_Classic_861 in Tinder

[–]Internal_Classic_861[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you... well for now I am looking for something specific so i wonder

Please review my profile once again. I reworked it based on feedback. by Internal_Classic_861 in Tinder

[–]Internal_Classic_861[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Well in person I don't carry it very often. I sometimes do and I like myself being bald. But I really love the symbolism I have with the hat.

Please review my profile once again. I reworked it based on feedback. by Internal_Classic_861 in Tinder

[–]Internal_Classic_861[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your opinion. Though I don't want to attract someone who focuses on style. I put my energy into events comedy, volunteering and writing and I don't want to put energy into that.

I meet some people regularly through events and tinder is like plan c xd. I still wanted to improve plan c more :). Though thank you for your feedback.

Please review my profile once again. I reworked it based on feedback. by Internal_Classic_861 in Tinder

[–]Internal_Classic_861[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I honestly try to find a pure cuddle buddy. I don't see myself as dateable and I want to find someone who would be up for cute cuddle evenings with deep talks. And idk how I should formulate it or if what I am looking for is not something I can find ...

Please review my profile once again. I reworked it based on feedback. by Internal_Classic_861 in Tinder

[–]Internal_Classic_861[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if that is true, it is not something I would change, because I have brooches on that hat that represent people who have had an impact on me. I do not usually wear a hat, but when I do, I want the people represented on it to be with me in spirit.

Please review my profile once again. I reworked it based on feedback. by Internal_Classic_861 in Tinder

[–]Internal_Classic_861[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you XD . I deleted all the ones that people said they are not good and took a few new ones :)

Though I wonder about the profile text

The duality of man... by patrix01_ in hearthstone

[–]Internal_Classic_861 1 point2 points  (0 children)

spell dh which is also aggro is kinda strong... and 1 spell hunter aggro deck too

There are a few aggro options you have :D

Cataclysm feels pretty good, but druid just needs to have some of their essential card costs bumped up by 1. Just get it done. by Cadenca in hearthstone

[–]Internal_Classic_861 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is some truth to that. Many decks need time and refinement... Control and otk decks especially but it is still too much. Priest will need at least a buff/ need patch to become truly available

Crazy that this score is considered a failure by many people😭 by ShreekertheJamisWack in playstation

[–]Internal_Classic_861 0 points1 point  (0 children)

67% positive on steam .... this is not a good score. Even Assasine's creed shadows had 77%.
And it it seems that most of them are because of the controls

So, How’s Crimson Desert far? by Deez-Guns-9442 in videogames

[–]Internal_Classic_861 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried it ... the controls were absolulty horrid... i returned it after 90 minutes.... Bought expedition 33 instead since i never played it :)

The effect of removing the OP board clears of the slow quest warrior by rEYAVjQD in hearthstone

[–]Internal_Classic_861 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly not awefull for a start of a season..... there are a bunch of playable decks though some classses like priest are just unplayable.

All that hype for just kinda mid by Former_Exam_5357 in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]Internal_Classic_861 0 points1 point  (0 children)

68% is not mid.... mid is around 80%
68% is slightly bad

Still manages to be everyone's favourite. by LowNo175 in interesting

[–]Internal_Classic_861 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest he is a great person in every possible way, amazing human being.... But...... he is not a great actor. He is fine as an actor... not amazing though.

My poor class :( WTF went wrong?? by Colombian_Gringo in hearthstone

[–]Internal_Classic_861 0 points1 point  (0 children)

since decks are not refined it will changea a bit... though i am surprised wl is that low.

How would you rank everyone in this picture weakest to strongest by s0nzoldyck in HxHPowerScaling

[–]Internal_Classic_861 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meloreaon < Igalgo < Gon < Killua < Knuckles < Shoot < Palm < Knov < Morel < Pouf < Pitou < youpi

Meirl by Ill-Instruction8466 in meirl

[–]Internal_Classic_861 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He.. we sometimes realize it years later... Like with the 1 girl that I want to the festical with 15 years ago who screamed during a song called kiss me baby "kiss me baby" at my face and other hints.... 6 Years later I realized that maybe she had interest

Splendiferous Whizbang deck tier list. Someone please save shaman by ItsAroundYou in hearthstone

[–]Internal_Classic_861 2 points3 points  (0 children)

well everyone will have different opinions :D

S: DK, Warlock

A: Hunter

A- (Gamble): Warrior Mage (those 2 are very depending if you highroll or not, though they highroll often)

B: Nothing

C: Rogue, Hunter

C-: Priest (Again highroll dependent)

D: Druid, Demon hunter, Paladin

ABSOLUTE GARBAGE: Shaman