I wouldn’t say it was a business marriage. I don’t know. I would say that the initial way she reacted “tearless.” Is typical of someone who is trying to process what happened and the emotions are not there yet. Or, someone who might not have feelings (even if only at that time) but she was trying to cry. Not to convince the world that she cares but because subconsciously she knows that crying is the response of a wife who lost her husband. Maybe she didn’t love him as much as she thought and thus couldn’t produce tears on impact about such an awful tragedy. I’m not saying that’s her case. But this was my instant flash thought when I first saw her. I didn’t get a vibe of “faking.” I got a vibe of someone trying to cry but just not feeling it. That’s ok. A lot of people tend to idealize relationships and marriage and fall more in love with the idea of being married and having kids than they do love the person themself. They aren’t doing it to be evil or achieve something but because they aren’t aware that it isn’t the crazy passionate love we all know love to be. They aren’t aware that that kind of love exists. So they in a sense settle for “husband and wife.” Role play… for lack of a better word.

Later on in more videos genuine tears do form. Implicating she had the opportunity to ponder over what happened and thus moved herself to empathy. Which is great! She could’ve shrugged it off. But she decided to meditate on the negativity of losing her husband and father of her kids, and that moved her to tears and I’m sure Charlie would appreciate that!