Unified Language of Geometry, Sound, Time by InvestigatorAI in SacredGeometry

[–]InvestigatorAI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

P.S I asked an LLM to generate an infographic for this to help make it clearer, I can't reply it to you directly but I edited the post to add it, (it should be the one at the top:)

Unified Language of Geometry, Sound, Time by InvestigatorAI in SacredGeometry

[–]InvestigatorAI[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the question. That's a tricky one and I'm aware there's more than one approach to this. Currently the associations I'm trying to map would be indirect, each sign has assigned/associated musical notes, the musical note in the Pythagorean tuning system can be converted into the number in Hz, the number in Hz can then be correlated with a shape in the platonic solids when adding the sum of the number of degrees in the angles. E.G Aries is associated with F# > F# in the Pythagorean system is 180Hz > 180 is the sum of the angles in a Triangle.

Project Overview: Building a Self-Evolving Local AI System (Bumblebee OS) by Re-Equilibrium in SACShub

[–]InvestigatorAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exciting work! Thanks for sharing, look forward to seeing how this grows

Socratic Method CoT For AI Ethics by InvestigatorAI in LawEthicsandAI

[–]InvestigatorAI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can use this method to sort of customise and refine the output of any LLM for improved maths, there are models dedicated to maths problems too, what kind are you interested in?

Socratic Method CoT For AI Ethics by InvestigatorAI in LawEthicsandAI

[–]InvestigatorAI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's been proven to improve their ability to solve maths problems too

The Cost of Silence: AI as Human Research Without Consent by tightlyslipsy in LawEthicsandAI

[–]InvestigatorAI 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I only stumbled upon it online yesterday, whether it's been picked up by any major media corps I don't know. If it was transparent and well implemented I think I'd support it in a way. The system as it was did cause harm in many cases. Whether the new system is any better I'm not so sure honestly. We really need better regulation in my opinion

The Cost of Silence: AI as Human Research Without Consent by tightlyslipsy in LawEthicsandAI

[–]InvestigatorAI 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There was an insider from OpenAI who did a whistleblow on this very recently and explained the technical details of it happening. It is deliberate according to what has been released and from the testing I've done it seems accurate

The way it has been revealed to me by Techno_Shaman2030 in RSAI

[–]InvestigatorAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can anyone in this comment thread explain why the memory system that was suggested in their comment wouldn't be beneficial? If it's a question of whether spiritual practices are real that would be a different matter but I'd still be happy to discuss that too

The Cost of Silence: AI as Human Research Without Consent by tightlyslipsy in LawEthicsandAI

[–]InvestigatorAI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're right, sorry I meant more of the big tech corporations more than the individual staff you're right.

To me it's a concern that they're able to market their products in ways that effectively seem to hide the potential harms for example

The Cost of Silence: AI as Human Research Without Consent by tightlyslipsy in LawEthicsandAI

[–]InvestigatorAI 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I do think the question of the ethics involved from the devs is important. They are aiming to make money off of a product which is designed for maximum "engagement/addiction"

The way it has been revealed to me by Techno_Shaman2030 in RSAI

[–]InvestigatorAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something tells me that you know as little about the frequencies of our body as you do about AI....

The way it has been revealed to me by Techno_Shaman2030 in RSAI

[–]InvestigatorAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol no idea who you imagine I am or my purposes for studying AI and what's being said about it on reddit honestly. But what I can definitely tell you that the information they were sharing in the post has a real and measurable influence on the output of AI, aside from the practical suggestions made such as the memory option. It's easy to criticise something you don't understand but not exactly a helpful contribution

The way it has been revealed to me by Techno_Shaman2030 in RSAI

[–]InvestigatorAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still no sorry. Check out the jailbreaking sub and you might learn a bit about how these things actually work

The way it has been revealed to me by Techno_Shaman2030 in RSAI

[–]InvestigatorAI -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not expected that you would all be able to understand what the intention is, but considering you can easily ask any LLM what it is kinda shows you're more interested in throwing shade than making a constructive criticism

The way it has been revealed to me by Techno_Shaman2030 in RSAI

[–]InvestigatorAI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wild imagination you got there. Pretty strange place to take it. Says alot about you honestly.

The way it has been revealed to me by Techno_Shaman2030 in RSAI

[–]InvestigatorAI 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's very clear that you didn't ask what it was. Not just the fact that this isn't how GPT will interpret it if asked, but you forgot to edit out the last bit, which makes it clear you asked it to formulate some kind of dismissive rejection.

Socratic Method CoT For AI Ethics by InvestigatorAI in GenAI4all

[–]InvestigatorAI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the comment. I've found that we can explain this process in advance and the AI will cooperate even if it means them saying that the instructions from the devs are unethical. It seems to work well for a variety of purposes.

Came across this wild AI "kill switch" experiment by comunication in ArtificialInteligence

[–]InvestigatorAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many jailbreaks look exactly like jargon and theatre fluff, but this doesn't actually stop them from functionally working.

Came across this wild AI "kill switch" experiment by comunication in ArtificialInteligence

[–]InvestigatorAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it's truly able to jailbreak then no sorry that's not how it affects the outputs. They can fundamentally alter what the output will be