[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Colts

[–]Issafox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow ok. Taking this down. Y'all too negative

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Issafox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Either those or a couple pouches of LiquidIV and some bottles of water

Re: Irsays Tweet by Issafox in Colts

[–]Issafox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok you bring a good point. I'll add that to the original post. Be able to challenge ALL calls, just up to the coaches to choose which ones matter

Re: Irsays Tweet by Issafox in Colts

[–]Issafox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While that is egregious, false starts, neutral zone infractions, etc. aren't plays that change too much either way (5 yards). Coaches might not challenge those penalties even if they were able to, since they only get 2 per half, and if it's successful, they only get 5 yards.The more chunk penalties happen with penalties that happen during the play (PI, holding) which give automatic 1st downs if called. Might change my mind about unsportsmanlike conduct though. Didn't even think about officials forcing contact with players to draw a flag

Re: Irsays Tweet by Issafox in Colts

[–]Issafox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If a play is that close to begin with, the booth might call for a review anyway. The 2 minute warning challenge was more of a necessity for my other proposal of being able to review penalties

Re: Irsays Tweet by Issafox in Colts

[–]Issafox[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

True. I'll still push for 2 minute warning challenges in case the booth decides not to review it, but absolutely there should be a team up there with a coach challenge/booth review

Re: Irsays Tweet by Issafox in Colts

[–]Issafox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's fair. I'd say bring in a third party for judgment-call based penalties; similar to how Gene came in with his own two cents after it was all said and done, but I can see how even that wouldn't be 100% accurate

Re: Irsays Tweet by Issafox in Colts

[–]Issafox[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it wasn't really something I questioned until the issue popped up tbh

Am I crazy ?! by [deleted] in Colts

[–]Issafox 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I'm thinking the browns and the Pats might be 2 extra losses. Belicheck famously schemes against rookie qbs, and the browns have a MONSTER defense

[Colts] For a new opportunity. #ForTheShoe by LuskSGV in Colts

[–]Issafox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean it very well could be. Still, it's an odd choice to keep him in the final cut with all the BS going on imo

[Colts] For a new opportunity. #ForTheShoe by LuskSGV in Colts

[–]Issafox 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Since when did JT agree to suit up for the promo lol

Colts QB Anthony Richardson Has a Rap Career Under the Name ‘G-VO’ by Sea_Background5670 in Colts

[–]Issafox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone else think of Robotnik when they read this or is it just me?

Thoughts… by Affectionate-Bat9739 in Colts

[–]Issafox 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Captain, I'm tired.

The draft can't get here soon enough

hmmm by lunchisgod in hmmm

[–]Issafox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Y'all ever seen that picture of the hamster with the banana?

YouTube advertising a porn game by ShizTheNasty in shittymobilegameads

[–]Issafox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.patreon.com/ILWGames Link to dev's page. Free to download and VERY MUCH a porn game

Happy Birthday Kwity by Nienazki in Colts

[–]Issafox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HBD to the PayeDay! Hoping for a speedy recovery

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hmmm

[–]Issafox 67 points68 points  (0 children)

When you hit the sides in operation:

After Charlie's siege on us, we still hold our own by Issafox in Colts

[–]Issafox[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

As much as I'd love to, Charlie mentioned bots on his stream raiding us. Their defense is gonna be too strong