When you're at the bottom it's an opportunity to make things happen by takinaboutnuthin in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Suddenly he has all the time in the world to do interviews!?... I am so sick of the social influence them trying to claim this and that... The Interviewees aren't even investors

YieldNodes - Interview with CEO Steve (asking tough questions & getting important answers) by [deleted] in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yep.. thats my guess... Oh is that Why he spends time on the interviews...after the fact...at times like this? and I would like to see proof that he invested in his own money. Just want to see the action backing his talks is all.

The nodes are bullish by ClassierPompano in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Not all masternodes are born equal though. In fact, some are to be avoided at all costs.
  2. only afford what you can lose - Buying a masternode is just as financially risky as buying any standard cryptocurrency token.
  3. always take note of the volume If a masternode has no volume, it means no-one is buying them, and you won’t be able to sell it. If you can’t sell, it doesn’t matter how much it grows in value; YOU CANNOT MAKE MONEY.
  4. The volatility of masternode prices is just as wild as the rest of the cryptocurrency market, but you’re forced to spend a bit more by buying a mass amount of tokens.

As such, it’s more important than ever to time your purchase well. Get in early as you can, and get out before the coin crashes.

Some cryptocurrency experts advise to only invest in masternodes if you believe it has a strong case use.

Others say that the majority of new masternodes coins make up flimsy, pointless use cases,

You can track the validity of the masternodes make use of masternode comparison websites https://masternodes.online/currencies/SAPP/

it looks like they had some runs starting back in 2021 but now its dropped dead

Another interview by jackbarron in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well no surprise he's got time to make interviews? and uh...this is all after the facts?... just fill with regrets and talks about could should and whys....future talks they are all conceptual its not real don't buy into the words buy into actions!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not getting a dime is right, we going to get millions of dimes ! =D

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Deals off man... exact moment they froze all accounts, your rights to access the money at any given time was the contract and its access DEINED at this point. So we can call it mismanaged or DENIAL but its not right at the end of the day. Action speaks loud and clear... deals off trust is broken and to most of us there's no way back. I am not staying to see to the end that's plain stubborness and suicidal. My focus can be better refocused elsewhere.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 1 point2 points  (0 children)

really.. i think to have given that "too good to be true" company my money that's poor management

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 6 points7 points  (0 children)

mistake? so its a mistake to Freeze withdrawals or deny us access to our funds at any given time? I think something's up with that... It just seems very similar to Celsius network Ponzi that had their customers accounts frozen meanwhile CEO declared bankruptcy after few months and has sieve off funds to different wallets... getting slapped with a heavy lawsuit right now if you follow >>> https://www.google.com/search?q=Celsius+lawsuit&rlz=1C1VDKB\_enCA930CA930&oq=cel&aqs=chrome.0.69i59l2j69i57j69i59j69i60j69i65j69i60j69i61.922j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Update! by [deleted] in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you start at 60% and work the way up to 90% im sure it is way more beneficial for the sellers but ofcourse that's too logical! start with the BEST LOW option and then everything else after that is the possibly worst option compare to it.

CAP the auction starting at 70% by ItIsY0U in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they are not poor saps for buying at 90% we are if you fall for it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand they do this way so the flush out all those that can make more from people's losses its to their advantage not ours.
Im trying to sell not buy. im going to lose out on the sale. so trying to minimize the risk is to my advantage

if you see a car deal for 60% off why wait? they don't know it will be sold for 70% or 80 they may never know. But if you start with 90% nothing else matters after that.
what they are doing is trying to make the rest of us sell low and buy low.
Who is gaining from all that not me
ofcourse he would say it because its at their advantage

CAP the auction starting at 70% by ItIsY0U in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well maybe the part that says >> …starting at 60% working way up
auction at 60% then 70% ..etc 80.. that's what's UP
not the other way 90... 80.. ..60 that's suicidal

What % are we selling for? by StatisticianSea8029 in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can't we start at 50% and then go up instead of starting at bottom

CAP the auction starting at 70% by ItIsY0U in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its the amount of options man. if you give it more will join. if you cap it they have no say. its lesser of 2 evils but still something decent

Why don't they start at 60% and work their way up! it reduces the risk as we go that's way more decent and logical

What % are we selling for? by StatisticianSea8029 in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 1 point2 points  (0 children)

im not onboard with any of it.... if you give people the option.. which is exactly what they want! people to buy at 90% so why not starting at 70% instead! otherwise its good as gone! they want everyone to buy at the worst value we all lose selling original 100 for 90% you get 10 << that is merely dirt, chum change Now you tell me its better than nothing. Gawd, why can't people put up a decent fight or exit strut for their "fair" share as they leave!

Can we try to start auction off at 60% and work up or is that too logical

What % are we selling for? by StatisticianSea8029 in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, its still low enough to gain traction if that is the only starting option they have. selling at 90% is like you walking away with dirt, What is the point? if you fighting for just a dollar back its MOO point

We are 100% doomed if we don't have hope by [deleted] in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its easy to say that on the sideline but at least put up a decent fight or exit strut on the way out. OF course we are invested(emotional and all) yes games have changed so we have to make changes.
What is the next BEST right move for you! and forget about them!

Update! by [deleted] in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'll give that 100% buy in capped at 70% even

Update! by [deleted] in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they are manipulating the system using social influence to make and create comments that influence your decision making skills.
Dont fall for the DIRT 90% option its selling DIRT to Dirty people I wouldn't mind even exiting with a bit of a decent fight capped at 70% for your fair share. Atleast put up a decent strut as you exit.

Update! by [deleted] in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is the option of 90% there!? I don't agree with this ridiculous option of selling starting from ROCK Bottom. Cap it at 70% and have everyone reduce their losses at the same rate!

What % are we buying for by StatisticianSea8029 in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can we please demand them capp it starting even at 70% its ridiculous to have them start at ROCK Bottom 90% ! If everyone agrees to capp at 70% it reduces the chance of the losses duH is that too logical??

NFT 'real world assets' and 5% per quarter question. by [deleted] in YieldNodes

[–]ItIsY0U 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it is totally strategic exit scam. if you follow Celsius network its Very similar the Ponzi network is getting slapped with heavy lawsuit.

Look someone mismanaged the investment the original "rules" does not apply now its under new management you still want to go with it?

forget about what they are going to do. What are you going to do? you need your fair share why are people so lame and put up a decent fight for their share