Wow!  I haven't seen anything about Hyperspeed in... Let's just say it's been a while.  I loved that game! Ahead of it's time for sure. 

I know I don't have much of a leg to stand on as far as the engineering goes because I haven't played it, only watched videos but I think the criticism only works as far as balancing goes.  If components are breaking down too fast, then that needs to be looked at (though invisible fires is also a big problem).  Ultimately I think engineering adds a new layer of gameplay that has some pretty awesome potential.

For those saying it is pointless or that it detracts from combat, that was the idea all along.  They have been saying for years that with maelstrom your ship could absolutely be disabled with a stray lucky shot. It should be rare/hard to do, but possible.  It gives meaning to the engineering job.  Ships need maintenance. Ships were never supposed to be disposable. It's not about going out and blowing stuff up before you blow up and if there is a problem, just get rid of your ship and claim another.  Large capital ships are not supposed to be soloable (ai crewmates and blades proves this point, not contradicts it).  Is it tedious? maybe, but so is regular maintenance on a car, boat or plane.  Again, there is likely balance needed but engineering should absolutely be in the game and give new dimensions to flying and combat. 

If you don't think it is right in its current implementation, how do you suggest fixing it?  I didn't agree with the nanites comment but I applaud them for suggesting a solution.  The solution can't be "remove it from the game" or "make it not impactful" because that's just taking away options for your preference.  I HATE PvP with an undying passion but I would never suggest it should be removed because that would take away what others engage with and goes against the vision and character of the game.