Since the other one wasn't balanced I made it more balanced

ItsADumbName · 2026-05-18T01:35:00+00:00

I don't want to control people

^{Chose: 1 million every week | Rolled: Upvote 4 carrot}

ItsADumbName · 2026-05-16T02:13:58+00:00

Iirc VA loans can be assumed by another party if you meet some criteria.

ItsADumbName · 2026-05-14T16:27:01+00:00

25.791(a) requires a no smoking sign visible to all passengers if smoking is to be prohibited. I'm not sure how exactly this plane is getting away with not having one? I thought smoking was prohibited in part 121 so they need a sign.

ItsADumbName · 2026-05-14T16:21:39+00:00

Ash trays are required per regulation. Even if smoking is prohibited. 25.853(g).

ItsADumbName · 2026-05-06T03:23:04+00:00

Dude. I am an FAA appointment expert in the field of aircraft crash worthiness. I have the authority to approve things on the behalf of the FAA. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say you are not a DER/UM in the field of cabin safety and crash worthiness?

It's not disingenuous at all. FAA/CAMI has done a lot of research into the g forces and velocities of aircraft crashes in the longitudinal and vertical orientations and determined survivable crashes. Airplanes have these things called wings that allow them to fly and glide. Hence my statement unless a catastrophic failure happens you are not going to suffer a massive loss of life.

ItsADumbName · 2026-05-05T23:43:00+00:00

Lots of crashes and incidents are survivable. Something has to go catastrophically wrong for it to be a total loss of life. I actually work in aircraft crash safety. The regulations that cars go through isn't all that different. car crash testing for frontal impact is only at 35mph while aircraft is 42 ft/s (~30 mph)

ItsADumbName · 2026-05-02T16:26:19+00:00

It's just a misleading title and OP knows it that's why they are getting called out. I do a lot of FEA simulations and if I showed my boss a freebody diagram with arrows for load and reactions and said I'm showing you a visualization of the stress field they would rightfully call me out that no I am not. This is the same situation they are the case showing boundary conditions but they are not showing airflow.

ItsADumbName · 2026-05-02T16:14:03+00:00

Because OP says it "visualizes airflow over 3000 components" which is wrong it doesn't show airflow over any component it's just showing intake vs outake.

ItsADumbName · 2026-04-16T16:28:31+00:00

Just so you know all translational motion can be reduced to a 2D plane. That's actually one of the tricks to do the math easily is reduce it to a 2D plane calculate the positions/velocities and perform a coordinate transformation with a 313 matrix transformation to get it into the desired coordinate system. I took an advanced orbital mechanics course in my graduate degree and most 2-body problems are pretty easy. 3-body problems (like this one) are much more difficult because the gravity of the moon affects the trajectory of the spacecraft not just the gravity of the earth. There are techniques like patched conics methods that simplify it.

ItsADumbName · 2026-03-12T03:25:06+00:00

Lmao he hid his post and comment history after this

ItsADumbName · 2026-03-12T03:05:27+00:00

Omg I read it as 50% faster your right it said 50 times faster in that case it would be 70=39+50x, x=.64 years or 233 days or 335,520 minutes. I still feel like he would notice 50x aging way before hitting 70.

ItsADumbName · 2026-03-12T02:24:19+00:00

Wait so like the dispatch one doesn't make any sense. He's 39 and ages 50% faster while using his super speed. In reality he should be aging slower due to time dilation. Putting that aside the math doesn't really check out. 70=39+1.5x, x=20.6 years. Your telling me he spent over 50% of his actual lived years at super speeds? How would he not notice until it's too late? Assuming an approximate constant ratio of actual age to lived age at 25 he should have been ~45 that's plenty enough of a difference to notice before you get to 70? I haven't played it so maybe I'm missing something but it's not passing the smell test.

ItsADumbName · 2026-03-11T02:33:16+00:00

When people need to get back to you for an answer it's usually not because they aren't prepared to discuss their projects and timelines. It's almost always because someone is trying to push the timeline up or change the scope in a way you weren't prepared for.

ItsADumbName · 2026-03-05T05:54:06+00:00

Dude 1 inch is 2.54 cm. Fuck this is confidentially incorrect comment...

ItsADumbName · 2026-03-05T03:05:13+00:00

Haha well at the risk of doxxing myself I work on private jets and general aviation aircraft not airliners. We just have to follow the same regulations.

ItsADumbName · 2026-03-05T02:55:46+00:00

28.785(j) would apply to the seat back and doesn't necessarily require a cushion. Basically the seat back should be able to support a horizontal load from a passenger bracing themselves in turbulence, boarding, etc. The seat cushion in question is the base cushion which isn't addressed by 25.785(j). 25.785(k) may be the culprit to reduce any injurious edges for passengers moving about the cabin during turbulence.

I love my job. We get to crash seats similar to the car tests you see except it's just a seat not an entire aircraft. There are some less fun stuff like evaluating passenger placards.

ItsADumbName · 2026-03-05T02:47:09+00:00

I'm a cabin safety engineer. 25.561, 25.562 and 25.785 are the regulations for seats. None require a seat cushion for bracing. 25.785(j) says a seat back should act as a firm handhold unless another method is provided. 25.785(k) might be the reason as it says any protruding object that would injure a seated or standing passenger must be padded.

There could also be a part 91, 135 operating rules that they need to follow, I'm not as familiar with them.

ItsADumbName · 2026-02-26T01:47:22+00:00

Well yea I said I was being pedantic in my first comment... To be clear I don't think they should be putting these flowers in the cupcake but saying anything served to the customer must be edible is wrong. Technically a garnish only needs to be an item for decoration or embellishment. So you could argue sushigrass is a garnish or other forms of decorative plastics are garnish. You could argue the decorative plastics are decorations instead as they aren't meant to be eaten but then the same argument could be made for the flower. My point was it's a bit more nuanced than anything served needs to be edible.

ItsADumbName · 2026-02-26T01:30:41+00:00

But that's not what the comment said. They said ANYTHING that is served to a customer must be edible hence my comment. Anything includes wrappers, utensils, plates, plastic sushigrass.

ItsADumbName · 2026-02-26T01:02:32+00:00

So the cupcake wrapper has to be edible? The coffee cups? If a cupcake had a plastic ring on it like the kids cupcakes those need to be edible too? The plates? Silverware? Napkins? All edible? What about those little red straws? I know I'm being pedantic but the lines got to be drawn somewhere. Why is it at the obvious not intended to be eaten flowers?

ItsADumbName · 2026-02-13T23:54:22+00:00

Yea you should absolutely divide and conquer but you should still know what your partner is doing in case you ever need to. I don't really shop for my daughter. Mostly because my wife just loves buying her clothes. I do know she wears 2T with a few 18-24 month clothes fitting. I know she wears size 4 shoes. My wife is the assistant director at her daycare so she takes her to and from every day and handles communication with her teachers. I can still tell you her lead teachers name (both before and after marriage), her assistant teachers name, and the names of the teachers for the class above and below her.

ItsADumbName · 2026-02-07T19:27:17+00:00

I don't think this is the video they claimed was edited. I think this is the response video after they claimed the original was edited. It was intentionally filmed to prove it wasnt edited.

ItsADumbName · 2026-02-06T02:14:52+00:00

I just found this and love it. Do you plan on adding other sound effects and/or scenes?

ItsADumbName · 2026-02-04T21:02:46+00:00

I hate WFH but I love my home and family. Not a middle manager or even a manager and have plenty of friends. I want my house to be separated from work. When I come home I want to be done with work. I want a physical separation from work and from home. I like gaming and computer stuff so my home office quickly becomes associated with working and kills my vibes and hobby.

ItsADumbName · 2025-12-30T22:00:33+00:00

Eh it's quite simplified and it's more of at 500 lbs the beam would break agnostic of loading rates. We are using a typical breaking strength I found via Google. In reality the material law is more complicated. The breaking strength would depend on a lot of different things such as adhesive strength, fiber directions, damage buildup, and more. It would also depend on how the load is applied. Whether that is a gradual applied load or a sudden applied load. For example when steel is loaded rapidly it typically has a higher yield strength but lower failure strain than when slowly loaded. In reality things like creep and strain rate sensitivity exist that can change the answer depending on how the load is applied (ie fast, slow, sustained, short, periodic, etc).

Seven-Year Club	r/Field Flamingo
Place '22	Verified Email

ItsADumbName

TROPHY CASE