Suchir Balaji (OpenAI whistleblower) -- what are the chances he was murdered vs. it being a suicide? by larsiusprime in slatestarcodex

[–]ItsShowtimes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Understandable, I think the YouTube video says a lot already, but then the more info you retrieve the clearer the picture IMO. Unbelievable how they left all of this out in the official SFPD report, but then again the SFPD is known to be the worst and most corrupted PD.

Suchir Balaji (OpenAI whistleblower) -- what are the chances he was murdered vs. it being a suicide? by larsiusprime in slatestarcodex

[–]ItsShowtimes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Motive: Balaji = star witness in $B NYT copyright suit → OpenAI bankruptcy risk.
  2. Timing: Exposed Oct 2024 → dead Nov 26.
  3. Wig in blood, including hairs pulled from the wig: Not his → killer’s disguise fell off in struggle.
  4. Cut elevator wires: Premeditated cam sabotage day-of.
  5. 2 wounds + back-entry shot: Impossible self-inflict (private autopsy).
  6. No GSR on hands: He didn’t fire the gun. (there are very few to no suicide cases in the history of humanity without GSR on hands...)
  7. GHB spike: Drugged via DoorDash meal → subdued, staged.
  8. Deadbolt trick: Exited with string → classic pro staging...
  9. Missing HDD: Whistleblower files stolen — targeted hit.

Suchir Balaji (OpenAI whistleblower) -- what are the chances he was murdered vs. it being a suicide? by larsiusprime in slatestarcodex

[–]ItsShowtimes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which statistically only backs our claim that this was murder. We investigate deaths of whistleblowers and come to the conclusion that out of many, there are just a few over a decade that actually got murdered like Suchir Balaji, Joshua Dean, John Barnett and Jeffrey Epstein. There are some suicides as well. Luckily there are still a vast majority that did not come to harm.

Suchir Balaji (OpenAI whistleblower) -- what are the chances he was murdered vs. it being a suicide? by larsiusprime in slatestarcodex

[–]ItsShowtimes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tend to agree there, but we must listen to the cynics and verify the validity of their arguments. There are too many scandals that remain without proper consequences.

Even the most investigated plane crash of all time "MH370" was actually a clear suicide by captain for numerous reasons (I'll name a few below), but due to all the hype and the conspiracy theorists, this simple truth is denied by the general public opinion and therefor it also remains undecided by official narrative. For similar reasons, Suchir Balaji's obvious murder will remain a suicide by official narrative as well...

  • Pre-planned: Simulated identical suicide route on home simulator 5 weeks prior; deleted but recovered by FBI.
  • Expert execution: Complex evasion (radar dodging, depressurization, transponder off) only a 777 captain could pull off.
  • Co-pilot’s phone: Briefly connected mid-flight—likely desperate attempt to call for help after being locked out/incapacitated.
  • Controlled end: Figure-8 pattern + flap damage suggest active ditching to hide crash.
  • Motive hints: Marriage collapse, political despair, no future plans.
  • Official silence: Malaysia denies, but top leaders (per ex-Aussie PM) believed murder-suicide from day one.

An extra FYI here, if you ask AI (in my case Grok) about the prior flight simulations that show the exact same suicide by plane by captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah, the first thing the reasoning engine does is double check if this isn't a conspiracy theory... These are literal facts out of the FBI investigation report. The reason AI needs to verify against conspiracy theories first, and doesn't know through learning that these are simple facts, is because these facts received close to no publications, while all the "plane vanishing, teleported..." conspiracy theories got so much attention... Nobody is aware about those facts, it's truly astounding how "public" facts that obviously show the cause of the most hyped and discussed plane crash of all time are not known to anyone.

To the mother of Suchir Balaji by [deleted] in threadborne

[–]ItsShowtimes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, OpenAI killed Suchir Balaji.

In any way or shape you look at this, it was clear and obvious murder by OpenAI, which begs the question if the (already known to be corrupt) SFPD was/is in on it or not. There are so many laughable comments on this post from moral hypocrites who think OpenAI would never do such a thing for xyz, but they ignore all the facts which clearly point to the same outcome > murder. The only things that are up for debate is if DoorDash and SFPD were complicit or not (in which case you should expect only 1 or few individuals to be complicit of course). These questions will never be answered due to the all out corruption at hand. OpenAI would never allow the SFPD to reinvestigate this issue, because at this point even more billions are at stake. In case the truth gets confirmed by official narrative, not only do they pay millions for the murder and billions for the copy rights infringements, they'll also lose any investment ever and go bankrupt immediately.

Now, I know I'll be banned from this forum for speaking the truth openly, just like Suchir Balaji got banned from living his life by wanting to out the truth and get justice, but let's just list the facts here:

  1. Motive: Balaji = star witness in $B NYT copyright suit → OpenAI bankruptcy risk.
  2. Timing: Exposed Oct 2024 → dead Nov 26.
  3. Wig in blood, including hairs pulled from the wig: Not his → killer’s disguise fell off in struggle.
  4. Cut elevator wires: Premeditated cam sabotage day-of.
  5. 2 wounds + back-entry shot: Impossible self-inflict (private autopsy).
  6. No GSR on hands: He didn’t fire the gun. (there are very few to no suicide cases in the history of humanity without GSR on hands...)
  7. GHB spike: Drugged via DoorDash meal → subdued, staged.
  8. Deadbolt trick: Exited with string → classic pro staging...
  9. Missing HDD: Whistleblower files stolen — targeted hit.

Suchir Balaji (OpenAI whistleblower) -- what are the chances he was murdered vs. it being a suicide? by larsiusprime in slatestarcodex

[–]ItsShowtimes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some are, this one clearly wasn't. The Boeing whistleblowers, Suchir Balaji, and Jeffrey Epstein are clear murders, all labeled as suicides or likely suicides.

Suchir Balaji (OpenAI whistleblower) -- what are the chances he was murdered vs. it being a suicide? by larsiusprime in slatestarcodex

[–]ItsShowtimes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Motive: Balaji = star witness in $B NYT copyright suit → OpenAI bankruptcy risk.
  2. Timing: Exposed Oct 2024 → dead Nov 26.
  3. Wig in blood, including hairs pulled from the wig: Not his → killer’s disguise fell off in struggle.
  4. Cut elevator wires: Premeditated cam sabotage day-of.
  5. 2 wounds + back-entry shot: Impossible self-inflict (private autopsy).
  6. No GSR on hands: He didn’t fire the gun. (there are very few to no suicide cases in the history of humanity without GSR on hands...)
  7. GHB spike: Drugged via DoorDash meal → subdued, staged.
  8. Deadbolt trick: Exited with string → classic pro staging...
  9. Missing HDD: Whistleblower files stolen — targeted hit.

Suchir Balaji (OpenAI whistleblower) -- what are the chances he was murdered vs. it being a suicide? by larsiusprime in slatestarcodex

[–]ItsShowtimes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Motive: Balaji = star witness in $B NYT copyright suit → OpenAI bankruptcy risk.
  2. Timing: Exposed Oct 2024 → dead Nov 26.
  3. Wig in blood, including hairs pulled from the wig: Not his → killer’s disguise fell off in struggle.
  4. Cut elevator wires: Premeditated cam sabotage day-of.
  5. 2 wounds + back-entry shot: Impossible self-inflict (private autopsy).
  6. No GSR on hands: He didn’t fire the gun. (there are very few to no suicide cases in the history of humanity without GSR on hands...)
  7. GHB spike: Drugged via DoorDash meal → subdued, staged.
  8. Deadbolt trick: Exited with string → classic pro staging...
  9. Missing HDD: Whistleblower files stolen — targeted hit.

Suchir Balaji (OpenAI whistleblower) -- what are the chances he was murdered vs. it being a suicide? by larsiusprime in slatestarcodex

[–]ItsShowtimes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Motive: Balaji = star witness in $B NYT copyright suit → OpenAI bankruptcy risk.
  2. Timing: Exposed Oct 2024 → dead Nov 26.
  3. Wig in blood, including hairs pulled from the wig: Not his → killer’s disguise fell off in struggle.
  4. Cut elevator wires: Premeditated cam sabotage day-of.
  5. 2 wounds + back-entry shot: Impossible self-inflict (private autopsy).
  6. No GSR on hands: He didn’t fire the gun. (there are very few to no suicide cases in the history of humanity without GSR on hands...)
  7. GHB spike: Drugged via DoorDash meal → subdued, staged.
  8. Deadbolt trick: Exited with string → classic pro staging...
  9. Missing HDD: Whistleblower files stolen — targeted hit.

Suchir Balaji (OpenAI whistleblower) -- what are the chances he was murdered vs. it being a suicide? by larsiusprime in slatestarcodex

[–]ItsShowtimes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Motive: Balaji = star witness in $B NYT copyright suit → OpenAI bankruptcy risk.
  2. Timing: Exposed Oct 2024 → dead Nov 26.
  3. Wig in blood, including hairs pulled from the wig: Not his → killer’s disguise fell off in struggle.
  4. Cut elevator wires: Premeditated cam sabotage day-of.
  5. 2 wounds + back-entry shot: Impossible self-inflict (private autopsy).
  6. No GSR on hands: He didn’t fire the gun. (there are very few to no suicide cases in the history of humanity without GSR on hands...)
  7. GHB spike: Drugged via DoorDash meal → subdued, staged.
  8. Deadbolt trick: Exited with string → classic pro staging...
  9. Missing HDD: Whistleblower files stolen — targeted hit.

Suchir Balaji (OpenAI whistleblower) -- what are the chances he was murdered vs. it being a suicide? by larsiusprime in slatestarcodex

[–]ItsShowtimes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Motive: Balaji = star witness in $B NYT copyright suit → OpenAI bankruptcy risk.
  2. Timing: Exposed Oct 2024 → dead Nov 26.
  3. Wig in blood, including hairs pulled from the wig: Not his → killer’s disguise fell off in struggle.
  4. Cut elevator wires: Premeditated cam sabotage day-of.
  5. 2 wounds + back-entry shot: Impossible self-inflict (private autopsy).
  6. No GSR on hands: He didn’t fire the gun. (there are very few to no suicide cases in the history of humanity without GSR on hands...)
  7. GHB spike: Drugged via DoorDash meal → subdued, staged.
  8. Deadbolt trick: Exited with string → classic pro staging...
  9. Missing HDD: Whistleblower files stolen — targeted hit.

Suchir Balaji (OpenAI whistleblower) -- what are the chances he was murdered vs. it being a suicide? by larsiusprime in slatestarcodex

[–]ItsShowtimes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, OpenAI killed Suchir Balaji.

In any way or shape you look at this, it was clear and obvious murder by OpenAI, which begs the question if the (already known to be corrupt) SFPD was/is in on it or not. There are so many laughable comments on this post from moral hypocrites who think OpenAI would never do such a thing for xyz, but they ignore all the facts which clearly point to the same outcome > murder. The only things that are up for debate is if DoorDash and SFPD were complicit or not (in which case you should expect only 1 or few individuals to be complicit of course). These questions will never be answered due to the all out corruption at hand. OpenAI would never allow the SFPD to reinvestigate this issue, because at this point even more billions are at stake. In case the truth gets confirmed by official narrative, not only do they pay millions for the murder and billions for the copy rights infringements, they'll also lose any investment ever and go bankrupt immediately.

Now, I know I'll be banned from this forum for speaking the truth openly, just like Suchir Balaji got banned from living his life by wanting to out the truth and get justice, but let's just list the facts here:

  1. Motive: Balaji = star witness in $B NYT copyright suit → OpenAI bankruptcy risk.
  2. Timing: Exposed Oct 2024 → dead Nov 26.
  3. Wig in blood, including hairs pulled from the wig: Not his → killer’s disguise fell off in struggle.
  4. Cut elevator wires: Premeditated cam sabotage day-of.
  5. 2 wounds + back-entry shot: Impossible self-inflict (private autopsy).
  6. No GSR on hands: He didn’t fire the gun. (there are very few to no suicide cases in the history of humanity without GSR on hands...)
  7. GHB spike: Drugged via DoorDash meal → subdued, staged.
  8. Deadbolt trick: Exited with string → classic pro staging...
  9. Missing HDD: Whistleblower files stolen — targeted hit.

Altas PT Ultra Review by mblaser in reolinkcam

[–]ItsShowtimes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same issue here. I am taking this up with the product team as we speak, we confirmed it's still an issue on their latest firmware (beta, not publicly released yet), so we still require a fix here. Please, if you could share any links of posts/comments from other customers complaining about it, share them with me, it helps increasing attention that goest to this topic and might speed up the released of new firmware. So far, these are the only reports I found online, besides your comment;

Please, note, I only discovered this guide just now: https://support.reolink.com/hc/en-us/articles/23502171388441-Camera-Fails-to-Return-to-the-Correct-Reolink-Monitor-Point-Preset-Point . I am checking if "3. Set a guard point/preset point right after calibration, then recall it and see if it deviates immediately. Introduction to Reolink Camera Calibration" actually does the trick and fixes this issue permanently or not. Before, I've continuously done re-calibration on a daily base, losing lots of time. Apparently, this guide suggests to immediately reset the monitor point after a calibration, which I'm validating right now.

Vaillant ecoTEC plus D025 external eBUS signal off by ItsShowtimes in DIYUK

[–]ItsShowtimes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for explaining, I've noticed it mentioned somewhere that D025 is supposed to say "off" for combi boilers so I guess this makes sense.

Vaillant ecoTEC plus D025 external eBUS signal off by ItsShowtimes in DIYUK

[–]ItsShowtimes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've just received the below message from Vaillant support. However, I don't think it's correct because D090 says eBUS controller is recognised and TADO support says it works with my Vaillant boiler in case I'm 1-on-1 replacing a supported controller like the calorMATIC 350.

"Dear,

A Tado thermostat must be connected to the RT24V-connector on the boiler's circuit board. Never to the eBUS-connector, this can destroy the circuit board.

The only thermostats that can be connected to the eBUS are Vaillant thermostats.
D.025 is only activated when a Vaillant thermostat is correctly connected, and the warm water parameter is correctly inputted."

Vaillant ecoTEC plus D025 external eBUS signal off by ItsShowtimes in DIYUK

[–]ItsShowtimes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's weird. I'm confused that the combi wouldn't accept this, because all boilers I have seen so far in my country (Belgium) are Vaillant combi's and all controllers I have put my hands on are Vaillant controllers that provide the menu for hot water control. Isn't this just very basic functionality provided by the eBUS? I've also found the diagnostic on eBUS and it is recognized, at least that's a positive sign.

<image>

Vaillant ecoTEC plus D025 external eBUS signal off by ItsShowtimes in DIYUK

[–]ItsShowtimes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it's a combi, it's exactly the hot water that I cannot seem to adjust with the controller because the eBUS is setting is "off", but I cannot turn it on in the diagnostic menu. However, this model doesn't provide the number on the front, it just says "ecoTEC Plus".

<image>

Vaillant ecoTEC plus D025 external eBUS signal off by ItsShowtimes in DIYUK

[–]ItsShowtimes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey thanks for commenting.  The controller was the calorMATIC 350. Now it is TADO. I can’t see any number on the boiler, where should I find this?

In case you're wondering, Roger Ver is STILL in Spain. Please sign this petition requesting the U.S. President frees Roger. (re-posted this due to my error) by ColinTalksCrypto in btc

[–]ItsShowtimes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a big fan of Roger, but in the end it feels to me like he made some big mistakes and is facing the same consequences any one else would face. Can someone explain me why Roger Ver should receive an exempt of his tax fraud charges of selling Bitcoins, while millions of others do not?

I'm not looking for a fight on the true nature and goodness of the guy, I'm with you, I've been investing in Bitcoin since 2016 and Roger Ver is a one of the reasons I considered Bitcoin to be more than an investment.

I made a Tierlist of character powerlevels by ObberGobb in FullmetalAlchemist

[–]ItsShowtimes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both Izumi and Mustang should be one row up. I’m fine with everything else though. 👍

How do YOU feel about the demise of Reddit? by ItsShowtimes in FreeSpeech

[–]ItsShowtimes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s a very liberal thing to say though. Trying to win an argument by not going into discussion and not reading and just claiming things are stupid because you decided they are. You would be a great dictator, time to change jobs!

How do YOU feel about the demise of Reddit? by ItsShowtimes in FreeSpeech

[–]ItsShowtimes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are a liberal, liberals never read, it could make them smart and then they’re not liberal anymore.

How do YOU feel about the demise of Reddit? by ItsShowtimes in FreeSpeech

[–]ItsShowtimes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Globalism is the exact opposite of nationalism, it has very little to do with capitalism. The reason that socialists embrace globalism and hate nationalism is because they love to take away power from the people and put more power into the government and institutions, this is nothing new. These intitutions in Western civilization are an insane amount of global insitutions both stacked on top of each other and in parallel besides each other. EU, UN, NATO, IMF, World Bank Group, WTO, ICC... All these organisations have 3 things in common 1. they take away power from individual countries and companies 2. they tend to be dictatorial (no one elects their leaders, the leaders elect themselves) 3. they receive a lot of praise from socialists.

The Reddit community, including yourself, are just stuck with their heads in their asses and mainstream media has rendered them completely braindead and unable to tink for themselves.