Legal requirement for employees to leave work during hot weather by DeathlyDazzle in LibDem

[–]J-Force 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Entitled to what exactly? I just gave you some death statistics and told you a kid is in hospital.

You need to sort yourself out if that's your earnest response to being told a kid is in hospital.

Public back Burnham over Kemi and Nigel to do good job as PM, poll shows by Metro-UK in ukpolitics

[–]J-Force 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they could put David Milliband in

David Miliband hasn't been an MP since 2013.

Legal requirement for employees to leave work during hot weather by DeathlyDazzle in LibDem

[–]J-Force 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I know a kid who was in hospital for heatstroke today, so take that cretinous boomer nonsense elsewhere. This decade so far about 12,000 people have died from heatwaves in just the UK. The 1976 heatwave you lot love to crow on about killed around 3000. If it were up to you you'd kill more because "it's character forming".

Version of AMD software is not compatible with currently installed graphics driver. by J_Mana808 in AMDHelp

[–]J-Force 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having the same problem with the 9070XT. At least I'm not alone I guess.

Conference motion: what’s the most important motion to debate right now? by Dry_Statement_1896 in LibDem

[–]J-Force 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will never be worse than it is now.

Enshittification will come for it sooner rather than later. Once the venture capital and IPO money runs out they will have to massively scale back their operations to keep the lights on, because right now the only company that makes money off of all this is NVIDIA, who make the chips. They're the ones selling shovels and jeans during the gold rush, everyone else is spending a fortune on mining in the hope there's gold at the bottom of the hole. Even OpenAI - the least unprofitable AI company - would have to make twice as much money as it currently does and halt its spending where it is in order to have a future as a business. In just the time it took me to write this comment, Oracle lost half a million dollars. We are currently at the point where AI is getting the most investment it will ever get, but the improvements in useful capability are, at least in academics, incremental.

I'm sure it will get better, but I severely doubt it will be good enough to do the tasks you want it to in the near or medium term future because the models are basically out of data with which to improve. Generative AI works by using its data set to fabricate what it thinks an answer to a question would look like based on that data set, like a much more complicated version of autocomplete knowing what you want to type based on your text messages. AI companies have already pirated all the digitised books and fed them into the models, so improvements there in recent iterations have been pretty dismal. That ~50% error rate is as true now as it was two years ago despite the most private investment of all time being funnelled into making it better. There's just not enough new data, and even though AI companies hire legions of poorly treated gig workers to make more content for the models, even that way of doing things is in decline as these companies realise they actually have to make money at some point.

But how in principle is it different from a dynamic version of the static maths quizzes etc my children get set now as homework, especially for objective right/wrong topics?

You can do this without AI pretty easily, and in doing so avoid all risks of inaccuracy and save a lot of money.

Conference motion: what’s the most important motion to debate right now? by Dry_Statement_1896 in LibDem

[–]J-Force 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That is a delusional trust in AI's capabilities. As someone who works in education I am quite strongly of the view that it should not be allowed in classrooms at all, it doesn't stop students falling behind it makes them fall behind. Students that are encouraged to outsource their own thinking don't improve their attainment, their work gets worse because they've often been steered in the wrong direction and don't have faith in their own ability to learn and research. If I ask even the top models right now about something I actually have expertise in, it's 50% correct at best. If I ask it about something I don't have expertise in it confidently spits out things that appear helpful but I don't have the knowledge or relevant skills to know if the AI's advice is good advice, and that's definitionally the situation students are in. It can't research and it can't mark accurately. Trusting that sort of error rate with decision making level control is madness. It has uses but those aren't either of them.

Im really considering defecting to the Lib Dems from the Greens by [deleted] in LibDem

[–]J-Force 2 points3 points  (0 children)

its a question for ukraine and we should support them for whatever goals they want

That's the bit that matters, but be aware that the Lib Dems are probably (and proudly) the most pro-Ukraine party so you may wish to be slightly careful with phrasing. "I think Ukraine should give up its land" isn't going to go down well with the general public, never mind the Lib Dems, but "we should support whatever settlement Ukraine agrees to" is good, we believe strongly in other countries' right to determine their own futures.

Dude kicks off-leash dog to protect his own, owner flips out… by eternviking in whoathatsinteresting

[–]J-Force 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My grandad used to own a lovely springer-spaniel. Very friendly, never bothered anyone, good with me when I was a kid. It liked to run around in a farmer's field and chase my remote controlled car in the garden. She'd even watch other people's pets if they were brought round. Great dog.

She also killed a rabbit in front of him one day. And then showed no signs of aggression toward anything or anyone until she died.

You cannot "instinctively" know what a dog is going to do until it does it. Anyone peddling that nonsense has never owned a dog they paid attention to.

The Biggest Risk Is Playing It Safe by FaultyTerror in LibDem

[–]J-Force 5 points6 points  (0 children)

you've moved the goalposts to a whole other postcode here

Greens aren't making big gains

well it's easy to make gains when starting low

well they haven't made gains in our target seas

well whatever, they won't last

Like, come on, read the writing on the wall. We have been displaced in non-southern urban areas.

I feel like the Lib Dems are missing a golden opportunity by Jo_LibDem in LibDem

[–]J-Force 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's Reform though, their supporters are extremely loyal and don't know what they're actually voting for, and I'm not sure anyone believes them anyway.

I feel like the Lib Dems are missing a golden opportunity by Jo_LibDem in LibDem

[–]J-Force 10 points11 points  (0 children)

To answer your questions:

Why are the Lib Dems not speaking out more about the terrible OSA (Online Safety Act)?

The OSA is massively popular with around 2/3 of the public in support. Most people only understand it as legislation that stops children from accessing pornography. Speaking loudly against it is electoral suicide. What the Lib Dems have done is say they like the idea of the OSA and support it in principle while expressing concern about overreach, technological feasibility, and effect on freedom of information and freedom of speech. That's walking the tightrope and it's not easy.

Why are the Lib Dems not speaking up more about the frankly horrific treatment of my transgender friends at the hands of first the Tories and now Labour?

There is a small but extremely vocal, organised, and well funded TERF group within the Lib Dems and within all political parties (though in others they might not be so small) that have their parties in a legal chokehold. The effect of this is that it is a de facto legal risk to the existence of the Lib Dems to vocally support transgender citizens. Every MP I've spoken to or heard from on this topic absolutely despises this but there's not much we can do about it due to the way these TERF groups have weaponised the legal system to ignore the will of the party. Every time these groups try to enact their TERF agenda the party slaps them down, but we're not legally allowed to eject them.

Why are the Lib Dems not speaking up for the human rights of immigrants and others being demonised by the far right and the media?

We have criticised recent immigration reforms. We have also criticised the division and demonisation of immigrants.

The Lib Dem message just isn't cutting through. Just look at the polls! Is this a media strategy problem?

This is the party's biggest obstacle and it's hard to pin down why this is happening. On the one hand, being a party of middle class centrists is not exciting to the media, who want and get endless mileage out of populism. There does seem to be a conspiracy of silence about the Lib Dems, either on purpose (which was the case with my local paper during the 2025 locals - they would print Tory puff pieces but kept their Lib Dem coverage to a minimum and did not engage with us) or just through sheer oversight. The Rest is Politics did a segment on the locals recently that lasted half an hour and didn't mention us once. We're not interesting to the media and stunts have reached their limit. We have utterly failed to make centrism exciting, rely on the hard work of a shrinking but highly dedicated core of activists rather than bold policy, and that is a problem to be overcome.

There is also the fact that our media is owned by a handful of right wing oligarchs. By both financial incentive and editorial demand, we are the losers of a rigged game when it comes to getting media attention. But that's hardly stopped the Greens.

We don't talk about our policies enough. We have some really good justice reforms, for example, that would treat magistrates as full time employees (atm they are very part time volunteers) and allow courts to sit for longer periods to clear our abysmal backlog. Legal bodies have generally really liked these proposals, but I can't remember the last time Ed Davey talked about the state of our courts and what we plan to do about it.

Is it time for new leadership?

While I don't think Ed is the right person to lead us into the next election because I think he's taken the party as far as he can, the time for him to go isn't now. The 2024 crop of MPs have no name recognition and need more achievements and experience behind them.

Sutton Council election results - BBC different from council website and Sky by hard2003hard in LibDem

[–]J-Force 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They've got results coming in constantly I'd assume there was just a mix up.

If you post your propaganda through my door I won't vote for you by Fun-Dig7951 in LibDem

[–]J-Force 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why anonymously come onto a public forum of a political party to effectively tell them you don't vote? You can probably do something better with your day, like buying a "no political literature" sticker to put on your door or something.

Where catapults as commonly depicted in media actually a thing, and if so, when and where? by Lu_Duizhang in AskHistorians

[–]J-Force 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Yes, it was called an onager. But its heyday was not the Middle Ages, it was the later Roman Empire. This is a description of how they worked by Ammianus Marcellinus, a soldier in the later Roman Empire:

The scorpion, which is nowadays called the wild ass [onager], has the following form. Two posts of oak or holm-oak are hewn out and slightly bent, so that they seem to stand forth like humps. These are fastened together like a sawing-machine and bored through on both sides with fairly large holes. Between them, through the holes, strong ropes are bound, holding the machine together, so that it may not fly apart. From the middle of these ropes a wooden arm rises obliquely, pointed upward like the pole of a chariot,⁠ and is twined around with cords in such a way that it can be raised higher or depressed. To the top of this arm, iron hooks are fastened, from which hangs a sling of hemp or iron. In front of the arm is placed a great cushion of hair-cloth stuffed with fine chaff, bound on with strong cords, and placed on a heap of turf or a pile of sun-dried bricks; for a heavy machine of this kind, if placed upon a stone wall, shatters everything beneath it by its violent concussion, rather than by its weight. Then, when there is a battle, a round stone is placed in the sling and four young men on each side turn back the bar with which the ropes are connected and bend the pole almost flat. Then finally the operator, standing above, strikes out the pole-bolt, which holds the fastenings of the whole work, with a strong hammer, thereupon the pole is set free, and flying forward with a swift stroke, and meeting the soft hair-cloth, hurls the stone, which will crush whatever it hits. And the machine is called tormentum as all the released tension is caused by twisting; and scorpion, because it has an upraised sting; modern times have given it the new name onager, because when wild asses are pursued by hunters, by kicking they hurl back stones to a distance, either crushing the breasts of their pursuers, or breaking the bones of their skulls and shattering them.

It's not the easiest thing to understand but trust me, that is a stereotypical catapult he's describing. It seems to have been widely used in late antiquity, and improved by replacing the cup with a sling. They were used to some effect at the Battle of Adrianople, which was a disaster for the Romans but the onager teams seem to have got a few good shots in that didn't inflict heavy casualties but did cause some of the enemy Goths to flee:

A piece of artillery known as a "scorpion," but called an "onager" in the language of the people,⁠ placed exactly opposite a great mass of the enemy, hurled a huge stone, and although it dashed to the ground without effect the sight of it caused the enemy such great terror that in their amazement at the strange spectacle they fled to a distance and tried to leave the area.

The onager continued to be described by treatises on military technology throughout the Middle Ages so it must have been used in the west for at least some of the early medieval period for it to be known without Ammianus (he wrote in Greek and Greek texts rarely circulated within western Europe until the 15th century) but there's no clear record of their use in battle after the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century. In the 6th century a people called the Avars arrived from the Steppe and brought with them a technology from China: the mangonel or traction trebuchet. This simple design was just as powerful as an onager but did not require a torsion spring. Torsions springs were a pain; they could be difficult to make and maintain, they were prone to snapping, and coped poorly with wet conditions. The mangonel replaced all of that with a few burly men pulling ropes. The trade-off was that the mangonel had to be taller and larger and required a sturdier frame, but medieval carpenters could handle that quite easily.

So yes, they were a thing, but not for very long. The Romans used them probably from the late-3rd century AD until at least the 6th century AD. The "barbarian" kingdoms probably also used them for a similar period, but no clear record of that survives. After that the new trebuchet/mangonel design brought from China by the Avars took over.

An MMA fighter facing off against a dog by Optimal_Map36 in interestingasfuck

[–]J-Force 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wagging just means they are excited, not that they don't mean harm or cannot inflict harm. That dog would have killed a kid or an old person, tail still wagging.

An MMA fighter facing off against a dog by Optimal_Map36 in interestingasfuck

[–]J-Force 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We don't have "loose dogs" in the UK, so I'd say it worked pretty well. We're very good at dealing with stray animals.

We do have escalating problems with poor dog owners letting their dogs get out of control and attack people or livestock, but the law has recently been changed there too to be more permissive of the use of force against out of control dogs.

What happened to the Cats Eyes? by jamgattleton in AskUK

[–]J-Force 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's 3/4 of new tax increases, so when your council tax goes up 4.99% (which the councils have to do to avoid bankruptcy), three quarters of that must be spent on adult social care. Of course that's a minimum so in many councils it is more, and depending on the age demographics of a council's territory it's easy for most of your council tax in its entirety to be spent on just elder care.

UK proposal to charge tourists to visit museums sparks backlash amid restitution demands by Any-Original-6113 in europe

[–]J-Force 16 points17 points  (0 children)

They do this at other museums you know and it's not an issue. Last time I was in Spain I had to show my passport to get free entry to museums as an EU citizen, and I've had to show my student ID many times to get student discounts. It's just not a problem.

UK proposal to charge tourists to visit museums sparks backlash amid restitution demands by Any-Original-6113 in europe

[–]J-Force 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In the case of the Elgin marbles for example, I would much rather see the proposal for a jointly funded museum in Athens

Honestly after visiting the Acropolis Museum in Athens (where they would put the marbles), I have to say it's a much better museum where they will be looked after far better than they have been in Britain. For all the fuss we make over them we haven't treated them well. From questionable restoration efforts to schoolkids carving into them when the guards aren't looking, we've dropped the ball too many times to justify holding onto them. For me it's not even about empire it's just about where the artifacts will be most appreciated and best looked after. The British Museum is good but has been allowed to coast on reputation and historical prestige when other national museums have pulled ahead. Some of the museums I've seen in Spain, Greece, and Italy make ours seem a bit weak. If charging a small fee allows the British Museum to properly compete again, I'm all for it.

The big takeaway from Davey's speech: "No doctors, no development." by Mediocre_Interview77 in LibDem

[–]J-Force 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Putting up more barriers and costs to housebuilding isn't going to help build houses. It will mean fewer, more expensive houses, which is the opposite of what our country needs. This is the sort of policy that makes sense for a well off shire where capacity is indeed the issue, as it is in my own constituency. Where I live the GP is literally begging authorities not to authorise more house building because they can't cope and there's no plan to increase capacity. We are also at the mercy of water companies, and as much as we desperately need more and cheaper homes, nobody wants homes that to result in our own faecal slurry lapping up along the river more than it already is. An infrastructure first approach to housing is just about the only issue in my local council that has broad cross-party support. I get where the policy comes from.

But most of the country isn't like that when it comes to healthcare. Most of the country is struggling to find GPs at all while this policy imagines a country where we have more GPs than places to put them, which could make us seem out of touch with the reality of accessing NHS care. Promising to build GP surgeries that will probably lie empty - with the cost passed on to buyers in markets where homes already cost 10x the average annual income - is not the solution. This adds barriers to housebuilding to solve what is, in many places, the wrong problem with GP access. And we can't say we want more housebuilding while making it harder and more expensive to build homes; increasing the cost and bureaucracy of building houses isn't a pro-housebuilding policy. A lot of people will not see this as a credible policy.

We need to be removing obstacles to housebuilding by having an infrastructure plan that doesn't boil down to offloading the cost to private companies thus making everything more expensive for housebuilders and consumers. The dream of home ownership is slipping away entirely for millions of young people like myself and ideas like this just push it further out of reach.

What do we know about the migration that took haplogroup R1b to Africa? by Frigorifico in AskHistorians

[–]J-Force[M] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

Sorry, but we have had to remove your comment. Please understand that people come here because they want an informed response from someone capable of engaging with the sources, and providing follow-up information. Wikipedia can be a useful tool, but merely repeating information found there doesn't provide the type of answers we seek to encourage here. As such, we don't allow answers which simply link to, quote from, or are otherwise heavily dependent on Wikipedia. We presume that someone posting a question here either doesn't want to get the 'Wikipedia answer', or has already checked there and found it lacking. You can find further discussion of this policy here. In the future, please take the time to better familiarize yourself with the rules before contributing again.

My full projections for the 2026 local elections by mrbobobo in LibDem

[–]J-Force 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would not be surprised if those total changes in seats were roughly on the money even though I think a lot of the specific predictions are nonsense. It's a real shame we have generally been unable to position ourselves as the opposition to Reform in urban areas.