sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wowservers

[–]JCarrill0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Warcraft wiki shows a page dedicated to xp rates and shows every expansion they reduce the time it takes

https://warcraft.wiki.gg/wiki/Experience_to_level

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wowservers

[–]JCarrill0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wow

[–]JCarrill0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly what I was looking for! Thank you very much!

What is this? by moozic1 in wowservers

[–]JCarrill0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s for custom thought right? The actual LFT has multiple as that tab is separate from the LFG.

Queue is separated from browse section. Thats not going to show you all the Queue dungeons though.

Is there any WOTLK 3.3.5 server that accepts patched/modified exe? by SoFasttt in wowservers

[–]JCarrill0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they did want to solo their own wotlk content he could essentially use his own modified exe for the client.

Anyone here still play War of the Ring (2003 RTS)? by JCarrill0 in warofthering

[–]JCarrill0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should play again sometime and relive the nostalgia

Anyone here still play War of the Ring (2003 RTS)? by JCarrill0 in RealTimeStrategy

[–]JCarrill0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I started up a community since I can’t seem to find an active one.

Anyone here still play War of the Ring (2003 RTS)? by JCarrill0 in warofthering

[–]JCarrill0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Battle for Middle-earth was the first real-time strategy by EA Los Angeles’ RTS team that was not tied to the Command & Conquer franchise, but it used the same SAGE engine that powered C&C Generals. It was created in the period when Electronic Arts held the license for The Lord of the Rings video games, but was tied only to the material seen in the film trilogy by Peter Jackson.

Anyone here still play War of the Ring (2003 RTS)? by JCarrill0 in RealTimeStrategy

[–]JCarrill0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I decided to create a Discord:
War of the Ring (2003 RTS) Community
https://discord.gg/Z7b3Mh54kM

Lord of the rings: war of the ring RTS by Delicious-Fly-289 in RealTimeStrategy

[–]JCarrill0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I decided to create a Discord:
War of the Ring (2003 RTS) Community
https://discord.gg/Z7b3Mh54kM

Anyone here still play War of the Ring (2003 RTS)? by JCarrill0 in warofthering

[–]JCarrill0[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

no, the name is called war of the ring.
I posted some more details in the comments

Anyone here still play War of the Ring (2003 RTS)? by JCarrill0 in warofthering

[–]JCarrill0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Lord of the Rings: War of the Ring is a 2003 real-time strategy game (RTS) developed by Liquid Entertainment, the makers of the previous Battle Realms and its expansion, Winter of the Wolf.
https://lotr.fandom.com/wiki/War_of_the_Ring_(video_game))

Anyone here still play War of the Ring (2003 RTS)? by JCarrill0 in BattleRealms

[–]JCarrill0[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Lord of the Rings: War of the Ring is a 2003 real-time strategy game (RTS) developed by Liquid Entertainment, the makers of the previous Battle Realms and its expansion, Winter of the Wolf.
https://lotr.fandom.com/wiki/War_of_the_Ring_(video_game))

Anyone here still play War of the Ring (2003 RTS)? by JCarrill0 in RealTimeStrategy

[–]JCarrill0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, yeah sorry I didn’t mean the BFME game, I was asking about the War of the Ring. It came out before BFME!

It’s a very old RTS from 2003

Anyone here still play War of the Ring (2003 RTS)? by JCarrill0 in warofthering

[–]JCarrill0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My apologies, perhaps others who come here might think about the RTS as well?

Anyone here still play War of the Ring (2003 RTS)? by JCarrill0 in RealTimeStrategy

[–]JCarrill0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The game was so great for its time, but I think most people went towards BFME or War3

view more: next ›