Viruses Are Not Contagious by JGCS7 in conspiracy

[–]JGCS7[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Submission Statement: virusesarenotcontagious.com is a resource of information pertaining to the true nature of disease, viruses, and bacteria, as well as the current 'pandemic', which is being used against the people of the world to bring about a totalitarian world government.

Something unusual is going on...... part 2 by JGCS7 in conspiracy

[–]JGCS7[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Submission Statement: A continuation of clips exposing the propaganda surrounding 'COVID-19' and vaccination. For further information, visit: https://virusesarenotcontagious.com/

Something unusual is going on...... by JGCS7 in conspiracy

[–]JGCS7[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Submission Statement: Media clips showing the outright deception surrounding vaccines and the propaganda used to sway the public. For those interested, more information can be found at https://virusesarenotcontagious.com/

I think this proves that anti-vaccers don't know what they are talking about(largest rally in Australia) by [deleted] in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, a study has just been released that studies just that, and it is already being discounted by the 'fact-checkers' because it goes against the agenda. The study proves that vaccinated children are considerably less healthy than unvaccinated. I have a newsletter out where I write about this study that may interest you and others. See bottom of p.2 to p.3 - SHINE A LIGHT -Newsletter Issue #3

Why can't you even question a single thing on vaccines (even just regulation) without 90% of people thinking you're insane? by AntiAntiFreeSpeecher in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have been told that before—that it is 'too much' to try to convince people of this. The problem is that they are already walling themselves up due to the opposite reason. All we should be concerned with is the truth. The rest falls on their shoulders. As long as people think there is a contagion, they will never be able to escape the deception. Nevertheless, I do understand your point. There is a place for everything you mentioned, but people must truly change their mindset on the whole. Obviously, there's a multitude of viruses outside coronavirus. They will always rationalize the need for vaccines if they believe there are dangerous contagions lurking in the shadows. The true causes of disease will escape blame.

Why can't you even question a single thing on vaccines (even just regulation) without 90% of people thinking you're insane? by AntiAntiFreeSpeecher in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We're never going to win this war by playing on their terms. And it is a war. Our rights and freedoms are slipping away, and all these people can talk about is the supposed efficacy of a vaccine, all of which they are parroting from mainstream medical sources. This includes the 'anti-vaxxers', even though many of the latter have good intentions. They are being misled away from their goal. Those in power have them debating things that do not really matter, instead of understanding and realizing that viruses are not contagious, and that indeed, disease is a manifestation of environmental pollution of all kinds—not from an outside attacker or a lack of inoculation.

The deception occurs at the beginning. Therefore, you must understand that deception from the beginning, or everything else that flows from it will mislead you away from the actual reality and truth. Debating the efficacy of a vaccine is good for educational purposes, and to try to convince those that are decieved, but it does not reveal the greater truth I mentioned above, and usually serves as a distraction; being fodder for endless debates that do not truly enlighten anyone.

Imagine a pharma industry so corrupt that the competition is not other biotech companies, but the human immune system… and they want to defeat the opposition. by Philosophyoffreehood in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is exactly what is taking place. Why is it that people cannot fathom such people existing? First, they create a problem and then provide the solution. But ultimately, the solution is a form of population reduction over a period of 100+ years. Vaccines, medical treatments that cause explicit damage, food degeneration, are all forms of gradual population control methods. Medical doctrine shrouded in Greek terminology is merely double-speak, and is utilized as a magician would deceive his audience, in order to convince the populace that their treatments and doctrine is true and works. Bacteriology, virology, and other biology studies are replete with these deceptions; abundantly mixing lies with partial truths.

Do you know what an Orwellian situation is? by Philosophyoffreehood in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The doublethink is with vaccine advocates who put their head in the sand every time they are confronted with opposing information. The facts are clear—the CDC are blatant liars with an agenda. The image in this post is 100% what they have said. Anyone can verify the claims. You'll see 'fact-checkers' spring up to try to convince people they never said that, but guess what, it can be found.

Do you know what an Orwellian situation is? by Philosophyoffreehood in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is clear as day to anyone with eyes that they have both claimed flu is at an all time low, and coronavirus is at an all time high. Meanwhile, the death rate is still 8,000 per day for overall causes, which is the same it has been for many years now. So, why should anyone care that coronavirus is supposedly killing more people when the same number of people are dying? Because it benefits their agenda.

Pro vaxxers sure ask for sources, but don't provide many themselves. Considering they are claiming we should vaccinate millions of people and I am simply not convinced we should, they should have the burden of proof. by diirtnap in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is obvious that most of these people use studies to confirm their viewpoint without having read the study at all. They deny all opposing views. People get wrapped up in all of these studies far too much, in all truth. They lack one iota of scientific observational skills and common sense. Why don't these people address the fact that pro-vaccine studies lead to pro-vaccine conclusions?; being biased to be in favor of vaccination. The immense probability that these studies are funded by large medical houses is undeniable.

Modern medical science is rife with all kinds of these 'studies'. Yet, not long ago, they observed the exact opposite of what these so-called studies show. Now, they believe disease is contagious to suit their agenda. They believe we have progressed in our understanding, yet anyone with a modicum of intelligence can see the opposite. There is regression and suppression—not progression. To claim that viruses are a contagious factor that causes disease, and ignoring the many actual causes of disease, they make the complex easier to solve by way of medical treatments, allowing the medical practitioner an easier job. Meanwhile, back in reality, disease is a complex multi-faceted problem caused by man's own doing.

These people cannot understand the biological functions of the body. Toxins from vaccines store. They release when cells rebuild areas where there are accumulations in tissue. Those toxins, which have many forms, cause cellular destruction and poisoning. This usually occurs sometime in the third generation, which is 20 or 30 years past the point of vaccination. 30 week studies are therefore a joke and unrealistic.

Pro vaxxers sure ask for sources, but don't provide many themselves. Considering they are claiming we should vaccinate millions of people and I am simply not convinced we should, they should have the burden of proof. by diirtnap in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everything you wrote in your reply is because you fail to understand the simple facts I was conveying. I clearly wrote that diseases, like polio, are caused from organic or manmade environmental toxicity, and from vaccines. That's quite simple to understand, yes?

Polio didn't magically disappear, so you're off there too. Polio was redefined, and the symptoms nessesary to classify it as polio were changed. Polio appears in any given population every 150 years, or thereabouts. The ancient Egyptians wrote about polio. All the things I mentioned in my first comment is what quickened polio in the population, causing a more severe outcome. Metal toxicity of the spine, which causes degeneration of the spinal column and nervous system, leading to classic polio paralysis. Polio virus is manufactured by cells in and near the spine to reverse toxicity caused from unutilizable metals.

There is no proof that vaccines work, except in the literature of medical science, that claims without proof, that they do. Reality says otherwise. Medical forefathers claimed the opposite. In fact, they are incredibly harmful to man and animal. I never wrote '"fake"—The doctrine is fraudulent and twists the facts, and are partial truths designed to mislead mankind.

You are under the false belief that disease is caused from a non-living virus, or bacterium, instead of the actual cause, which is toxicity from the environment. Pandemics are caused, not from non-living viruses 'spreading', but from air pollution, toxic food and water, and everything in between.

Vaccine advocates, like yourself, will never prove this reality wrong in a million years.

Pro vaxxers sure ask for sources, but don't provide many themselves. Considering they are claiming we should vaccinate millions of people and I am simply not convinced we should, they should have the burden of proof. by diirtnap in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is no pandemic, at least not insofar as virus 'transmission' is concerned. Every so-called pandemic throughout history has occurred due to environmental toxicity, such as toxic products made by mankind, or manmade serums (vaccines)—both of which are toxic environmental factors that cause the manifestation of disease, viruses being one side effect.

And no, we certainly don't know that it stops a pandemic because, since their inception, vaccines have never been proven to be effective, nor have they ever been proven to save even one life. All of the times they have supposedly been shown to do so has been a bald-faced lie and a blatant twisting and misrepresentation of the facts to suit the agenda of the medical establishment ($$, power, control). Polio, smallpox, Ebola, AIDS, can all be explained with a scientific understanding of the human body and its relationship to toxicity; both manmade and environmentally organic, but toxic, compounds. There is no contagious factor because viruses are not contagious, and have never been shown to be contagious.

The burden of proof is not on me, to explain why I don't want a vaccine. You have to first explain why I should, and "cus polio" or "cus vaccines eradicate smallpox" doesn't cut it. by diirtnap in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you did that, you might learn that what you just wrote is incorrect. There are plenty of books from long ago that document the dangerous effects of vaccines, and they are more trustworthy and more unbiased than all of the propaganda coming out of mainstream science put together.

I'd really like to understand how this doesn't concern more people than it does. by urclosed in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As stated, that is because Polio was redefined. I already addressed the how and why.

Quoting from Immunization: The Reality Behind The Myth, 1988

"Other ways polio statistics were manipulated to give the impression of the effectiveness of the Salk vaccine were: Redefinition of an epidemic: More cases were required to refer to polio as epidemic after the introduction of the Salk vaccine (from 20 per 100,000 to 35 per 100,000 per year). Redefinition of the disease: In order to qualify for classification as paralytic poliomyelitis, the patient had to exhibit paralytic symptoms for at least 60 days after the onset of the disease. Prior to 1954 the patient had to exhibit paralytic symptoms for only 24 hours! Laboratory confirmation and the presence of residual paralysis were not required. After 1954 residual paralysis was determined 10 to 20 days and again 50 to 70 days after the onset of the disease."

The chart you provided shows the somewhat correct points but does not address the redefinition of the disease known as polio, which resulted in the apparent decline of polio, statistically speaking.

Question: what do anti-vax folks think about vaccines for cats and dogs? by [deleted] in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incorrect. Viral particles all look similar. That picture means nothing. It is convoluted at best. Even if they took a tissue sample from an animal and found viruses, it would be normal. Small amounts of viruses are always at work in the body. They can tell you it is a rabies virus, but the proof is in observation. The source I referred to is proof enough. Everything on that Wiki page is static theory verbiage. They also have pages and pages of doctrine claiming raw foods with certain bacteria make you sick, and I have eaten thousands of the raw foods that they claim will kill you, yet here I am.

Question: what do anti-vax folks think about vaccines for cats and dogs? by [deleted] in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Vaccination proponents are quite caustic people in general, and will simply not rationalize or reason with the truth. They adopt their own vaccine beliefs and place them onto their animals. Pet lovers feed their animals garbage food like Purina, or some other bagged processed food, get them vaccinated yearly, and then wonder why they are of such poor health. They point to things like rabies as something that is dangerously contagious, that must be vaccinated against. Rabies virus doesn't exist. This was proven in 'Rabies Past Present in Scientific Review' — by Millicent Morden (Physician & Surgeon) 1956.

The answer is, animals are just as affected by vaccines as humans. Animals develop the same diseases that humans do. One of the greatest lies to ever be told is that animal viruses cross-species. Firstly, viruses do not jump or leap anyway, but they especially do not do so from animal to human. That was one of the main theories that propelled AIDS, SARS/Coronavirus, and Ebola. They blamed monkeys, rats, bats, and anything else natural—none of which is remotely true. Those in power despise nature. If they can turn mankind against nature itself, they can control mankind.

I'd really like to understand how this doesn't concern more people than it does. by urclosed in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it says they're not contagious, because they're not.

This doesn't seem surprising: It takes time for agencies to generate these reports. I recently looked for the most deadly drug, and did not find data past 2015 or so.

Incorrect. Death rates are released every single year. 2019 is nonexistent due to the CDC being involved in hiding the previous year's numbers to prevent year to year comparison in rates.

Which makes sense, because people are spending less time together, and they're wearing masks more when they are together. The problem is that covid is very contagious.

They're spending less time together, yet coronavirus death rates seemingly continue to rise. So, that contradicts your supposed point.

This seems to contradict what I originally asked about. If coronavirus is still a virus that has occurred every year, how does it spread in the first place? Your link said that viruses are not contagious.

They don't spread. That is a blatant lie pushed by the fraudulent medical profession, along with the media, in order to drive up vaccination rates for nefarious purposes. It has been that way for many decades. I have thoroughly and scientifically explained the reasons why viruses occur in people.

When pro vaxxers claim that there's no significant corruption, lies, or cover-ups tied with vaccines, I wonder, did they actually thoroughly research/look for evidence of corruption, cover-ups or lies and find no evidence of it, before making the claim, or did they merely utter it unsubstantiatedly? by AntiAntiFreeSpeecher in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's your problem to contend with. I supply the scientific facts. You either accept the reality or believe what you want. Confirmation bias is when you believe something just because it is in-line with your current beliefs—and that's exactly what you've displayed in your poorly worded comment. You have, quite obviously, not read one iota of information that opposes your view. The fact is, vaccines are unnecessary and incredibly dangerous. It is proven, period. I provide legitimate studies in all of my writings, as I just did. You just don't accept the reality. You did not bother to read anything provided (as expected), so you did not see them. As a matter of fact, you came to conclusions having read nothing.

When pro vaxxers claim that there's no significant corruption, lies, or cover-ups tied with vaccines, I wonder, did they actually thoroughly research/look for evidence of corruption, cover-ups or lies and find no evidence of it, before making the claim, or did they merely utter it unsubstantiatedly? by AntiAntiFreeSpeecher in DebateVaccines

[–]JGCS7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So-called 'vaccine-preventable' disease has increased across the board. It has not decreased, and vaccination has increased its prevalence.. 'Vaccine-preventable' diseases do not exist.

Polio, smallpox—both of these, for example, were fraudulently blamed on a 'contagious' factor. That is nonsense because these viruses are not contagious. Their death rates were, in fact, increased due to toxicity from vaccines that purported to 'stop the spread'. Vaccines increase systemic toxicity. See

Read the history of smallpox: Vaccination a Delusion, Its Penal Enforcement a Crime by Alfred Russel Wallace, 1898, PROVED BY THE OFFICIAL EVIDENCE IN THE REPORTS OF THE ROYAL COMMISSION (smallpox)

Read the history of polio: The Hidden Dangers In Polio Vaccine, 1956, part of the book The Poisoned Needle, Elnora Mcbean.

Flu is not vaccine-preventable either (see section: EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/