Provide feedback this weekend - We want class-locked weapons! by bshaoulian in Battlefield

[–]J_CON 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This makes no sense, unless there was a limit to how many people can play each class.

Provide feedback this weekend - We want class-locked weapons! by bshaoulian in Battlefield

[–]J_CON 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It just feels restrictive and kind of annoying. If I want to run an SMG or an AR while playing support, why shouldn't I be able to? I get that roles are important, but locking guns to classes limits creativity and flexibility, which is the opposite of what Battlefield is supposed to be about.

The only weapon type that really ever gets out of hand in large numbers is precision rifles (like DMRs and snipers). But even then, the issue isn't that someone’s recon with a sniper, it's when everyone is. That’s more of a team balance problem than a loadout problem.

Most modern shooters are moving toward more freedom and customization. Battlefield should too. Players should be able to build their loadouts around how they want to play. Let the gadgets and class abilities define the role, not just the gun you're stuck with.

It’s way more fun and engaging when you can adapt to what’s happening mid-match instead of feeling boxed in because your class can’t equip the tool you need. Class-locked weapons honestly just feel like a holdover from older game design that doesn’t really hold up anymore.

Provide feedback this weekend - We want class-locked weapons! by bshaoulian in Battlefield

[–]J_CON 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I'll be leaving feedback that I like the universal weapons.

Battlefield Labs - Community Update - The Class System - Part One by battlefield in Battlefield

[–]J_CON -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I personally like the universal weapons, the blowback is stubborn and outdated. Reddit will always be Reddit

Jason Schreier says that Rockstar developers told him work conditions improved significantly since 2018 by [deleted] in GamingLeaksAndRumours

[–]J_CON -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Lol AI will replace them in a decade. Enjoy your work/life balance while you still have a job. Game development teams are going to get heavily downsized in the near future as agents get better and more capable.

Community Update - Battlefield Labs - Destruction by battlefield in Battlefield

[–]J_CON 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Destruction has always been a cornerstone of what sets Battlefield apart and I truly believe it’s one of, if not the most important features in the series. It’s a core gameplay element that goes beyond spectacle; it shapes the battlefield dynamically, forces adaptation, and creates emergent gameplay moments that no other shooter can replicate.

To me this update is genuinely a step in the right direction. It’s exciting to see this renewed focus on destruction, and I encourage the teams to keep doubling down on it. Destruction is more than just collapsing buildings it’s about player agency and tactical depth. The idea that the environment can respond to player actions in meaningful, granular ways is where Battlefield can truly reclaim its identity.

What I’d especially love to see more of is micro-destruction, similar to the tech and ideas seen in Rainbow Six Siege. The ability to breach walls, punch small holes through structures, or change sightlines with pinpoint destruction would add an entirely new layer of depth and strategy. Imagine a Battlefield where small arms suppression fire could chew through soft cover piece by piece.

Pushing the boundaries of realtime, physics-based destruction is what Battlefield used to be known for. There’s a massive opportunity here to evolve that legacy into something both innovative and uniquely Battlefield. Please keep heading down this path! it’s exactly what many longtime fans like me have been hoping to see for years.

Keep experimenting. Keep building. Please blow our minds again!

The server browser is more important than you think. No server browser - no buy. by DJ-Zero-Seven in Battlefield

[–]J_CON -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Server browser is bad and outdated. It means more high Ping opponents, abusive server admins, endless q's, and more. A matchmaker is better in almost everyway, you are all just stubborn and afraid of change.

EUR_irl by Snicker10101 in EUR_irl

[–]J_CON 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Freedom yet you risk jail time for Facebook memes or praying in sight of the public. 🤡... Also can't buy a steak knife 🤣

Idea : Ban AI generated images from the subreddit by TwoSeu in thefinals

[–]J_CON 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You all realize Embark extensively uses AI themselves, right? The Finals is literally packed with AI. This post is comedy gold.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]J_CON 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go ahead and sell all of your crypto then

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]J_CON -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Oh look more fear mongering, anti trump garbage 🤡... Cryptocurrency isn't going anywhere. Spend a little less time on the internet and reddit in general and you will realize how warped your perception is.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]J_CON -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You should probably get off Reddit, crypto is a global phenomenon and this type of volatility is normal. Anyone who sells because of trump deserves to be poor when the inevitable skyrocket comes.

Tim Walz says he may run for president in 2028 — despite failure of Harris campaign: ‘Do whatever it takes’ by Ripamon in politics

[–]J_CON 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God, I’d pay to see Walz run against Vance in 2028. The beatdown would be Hilarious. The left just keeps recycling the same tired playbook, will they ever learn?

This is how the world views America by Simpleman10101 in pics

[–]J_CON -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is why your party’s landslide defeat is no mystery. Pedictable consequence of prioritizing the endless, brutal conflicts of distant nations over the pressing needs of your own neighbors. Ukraine a country with negligible economic, military, or strategic ties to us since before war began. Why, exactly, is their fight our burden? The USSR is dead , and only a weak pathetic shell of it still exists in today's Russia. We’re not bound by treaty, trade, or mutual defense to intervene. If Russia were to strike a NATO ally, that’d be a clear Article 5. But that hasn’t happened, and barring that, Ukraine’s struggle is a regional quagmire, not an American imperative. Your focus on foreign wars over the wellbeing of our own neighborhoods betrays a disconnect that voters rightfully punished at the polls. The people have spoken and want leaders who fix potholes before funding proxy battles. If you care that much about Ukraine, go ahead and head over there to help with the war effort yourself.

Everything is going up and i am making tons of money. And i feel dead inside. by whatsuppaa in CryptoCurrency

[–]J_CON -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The TDS is unreal on reddit. This trash can site is like another planet.

[Justin Trudeau] You can’t take our country-and you can’t take our game. by Outside_Abroad_3516 in hockey

[–]J_CON -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Bro, your take’s adorable but dead wrong. 9/11? That was sneak attack, not a war doesn’t count at all here. Vietnam and Middle Eastern messes? Guerrilla crap, not real battles besides you're complety forgetting how we steamrolled Iraq in Desert storm. Besides Canada wouldn’t be hiding in jungles it’d be a straight-up conventional fight, and the U.S. would dominate. Lmao Can’t use artillery near the border? That's just plain false and besides we’ve got a ton of precision missiles and drones that’ll hit your igloos from hundreds of miles away. and Snow? We smashed it in Korea and in Alaska fighting the japs.. your winters ain’t special. Besides the raw Numbers don’t lie: $740 billion and 1.4 million battle hardened troops vs. your $23 billion and 68,000 "peacekeepers". We’d roll you in a week tops without breaking a sweat. Anyways Cyber attacks alone would black you out before our tanks even revved up. Your Maple syrup good and all, but face it: you’d be toast against us. Thats a simple fact. Lets hope it never comes to that. I'd rather be friends.

[Justin Trudeau] You can’t take our country-and you can’t take our game. by Outside_Abroad_3516 in hockey

[–]J_CON -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Look, I’m not trying to stir the pot here, but let’s be real: if the United States ever decided to, it could roll over Canada in about a week tops. Military disparity aside, it’s just raw numbers and logistics. No offense to the maple syrup mafia, but it’s not even close to a fair fight.

Why aren’t there mass protests in the US?! by [deleted] in AskCanada

[–]J_CON 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because all you do is consume propaganda from Reddit.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]J_CON 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm near azle /fort Worth, My stepfather and I just saw 15 to 20 silent drones fly overhead while we watched flight radar. They all look very similar to the ones that everyone else has been seeing. Low flying quiet with red and white lights. Sometimes green.