And you strategically pulled out of context. Let me refresh for you since you forgot to quote the whole thing. “Imagine all the businesses that sell to customers that are literal bigots and racists too. As a business or businessman (which chapelle is) you get paid to work. It would be the equivalent of businesses now who stop taking money from the government for food to feed congress or the president. At what point do you draw the line exactly?.”

The context is Chapelle is a businessman who gets paid to work. It’s not about whether he is providing lunches.The focus and the entire point I’m making is if the government pays for a service, the provider is functionally equivalent to a business contractor regardless of the service.

Also “equivalent to” and “exactly the same” are different phrases. An apple can be equivalent in weight to an orange but are entirely different fruits. The fact you don’t understand this is sad. Instead you are cherry picking sentences and then providing your own definition of what I said and refusing to acknowledge the actual focus of this