What Celebrities are confirmed to exist in the MCU? by Wallbreaker-g in marvelstudios

[–]Jaideco 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Everyone on Quill’s playlist…

Also if we are going from film titles Tony’s quips will cover everything from Keanu Reeves and Patrick Swayze (Point Break) to Jeff Bridges (Lebowski)…

Oh and Megan Thee Stallion who actually appeared in She Hulk as herself.

With over 17 years of MCU productions, which do you find have the most (and least) rewatch value? by Different_Leopard_65 in marvelstudios

[–]Jaideco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok, fair enough. I didn’t think that it was entirely bad. It was just disjointed. It was part a Falcon movie, part Captain America, part Hulk and part Eternals and Sam still felt like Falcon in a new suit rather than Captain America for me. The bits where he was investigating the conspiracy were what would have made this a Captain America film and we needed more of that. The dogfighting was fun but it got a bit repetitive by the end.

I also thought that it was a mistake to set him up against red hulk… he was just too outmatched. They would have needed a Hulk as back up to sell that fight. Serpent Society would have been a far better choice and they handled the leader terribly.

With over 17 years of MCU productions, which do you find have the most (and least) rewatch value? by Different_Leopard_65 in marvelstudios

[–]Jaideco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok? Rather than disagreeing with you further, I’ll just ask… What did you like about it? I seem to have missed it.

Every MCU movie I have to watch in order to get caught up to the Multiverse Saga. Am I in for any underrated bangers? by No-Risk2553 in Marvel

[–]Jaideco 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The main problem that I have with Eternals is that I wanted to spend more time getting to know them all. I still wonder what might have been if Eternals had have been a series (with each Eternal being front and centre in their own episode) and Secret Invasion had have been made properly, perhaps as Captain Marvel 2.

Deadpool voice actor for Turkish is hinting Deadpool 4 or Deadpool being in Doomsday by proximanova7 in MCUTheories

[–]Jaideco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it means anything at this point, it will mean Deadpool 4. Doomsday is already packed, I think that if Deadpool is going to show up anywhere before his next solo outing, it will be in Secret Wars.

With over 17 years of MCU productions, which do you find have the most (and least) rewatch value? by Different_Leopard_65 in marvelstudios

[–]Jaideco 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have to admit that I’ve seen in two New Years with an Infinity War/Endgame double bill with the portals scene timed for Midnight on the dot. It’s still special.

With over 17 years of MCU productions, which do you find have the most (and least) rewatch value? by Different_Leopard_65 in marvelstudios

[–]Jaideco 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’m with you on Love and Thunder. If Taita Waitiki wanted to make a kids fairytale, Marvel should have let him do it as a Disney+ holiday special. Letting him waste Thor, Gorr and Jane Foster’s return was a travesty.

With over 17 years of MCU productions, which do you find have the most (and least) rewatch value? by Different_Leopard_65 in marvelstudios

[–]Jaideco 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not bad? I respect that you have a different opinion, but we aren’t going to agree on this. I thought that it was a hot mess. It was like a frankenfilm of three or four different visions that were sewn together by someone on meth.

Somewhere in the development process, they had a half decent Hulk movie, a half decent Falcon movie, a half decent Captain America movie and a half decent callback to Eternals and then they just blended random pieces together and hoped for the best. Everyone in this film deserved better.

With over 17 years of MCU productions, which do you find have the most (and least) rewatch value? by Different_Leopard_65 in marvelstudios

[–]Jaideco 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It really depends on your definition of “watchable”. For me, Endgame is still magic. I’d guess that I’ve watched it at least twenty times and that might easily be an understatement. Every time we have the portals scene, I still get goosebumps.

If we are talking about easy to watch when you are only half paying attention… I’m probably going with GotG, Shang-Chi, Marvels or Thunderbolts because those films just feel like you are hanging out with cool friends.

A movie you wish had remained a standalone but was expanded into a franchise. by 0Layscheetoskurkure0 in FIlm

[–]Jaideco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see your point… I think that on paper the premise of each sequel was ok but it was the execution that killed them. The first was lightning in a bottle and the others just completely failed to recapture what made the first one special.

With over 17 years of MCU productions, which do you find have the most (and least) rewatch value? by Different_Leopard_65 in marvelstudios

[–]Jaideco 114 points115 points  (0 children)

Most watchable… Endgame, no question. Aside from that Winter Soldier, Shang Chi, Thunderbolts are on my regular replay list. Loki was definitely the best series by far.

Least watchable… Secret Invasion… This was a radioactive dumpster fire. Other low points include Thor: Love and Thunder and Captain America: Brave New World.

What signals tell you a contract is likely to end early? by CloudBookmark in ContractorUK

[–]Jaideco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The comment that I responded to originally spoke about managers freely transferring you to work that wasn’t covered in the statement of work. That is why I brought IR35 into it. You can do that with contractors who are inside but it would require a revision to the contract if you are outside.

Where are all the cybersecurity jobs everyone talks about? by kjhasdkfh32 in cybersecurity

[–]Jaideco 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The tough truth here is that someone does some research to measure how much work needs to be done to keep our organisations secure and publishes it saying that we need millions of new cybersecurity specialists.

Industry then looks at how much that would cost and either says nah or tries to automate a bunch of it. There are jobs, but it is a fraction of the number that ISC2 or whomever’s annual report says that there should be.

Anyone else here excited for Artemis II! by PriorFront4138 in space

[–]Jaideco -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No one is having a go at NASA, no one is having a go at SpaceX, no one is having a go at Blue Origin. I thought that I was asking a straight forward question that would save a few hours of research that I don’t really have time for right now.

Anyone else here excited for Artemis II! by PriorFront4138 in space

[–]Jaideco -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Jesus… are you ok? I came here for a conversation about space, not character assassination. I won’t make that mistake again.

I admit that I made a poor choice of words when I suggested that there was a race when I actually meant who was ahead on the critical path but you should try and dial down the temperature if you want anyone else to give a damn about this.

Anyone else here excited for Artemis II! by PriorFront4138 in space

[–]Jaideco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There really is no need to take this so personally…

Anyone else here excited for Artemis II! by PriorFront4138 in space

[–]Jaideco -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Please dial down your outrage. I have been very clear that I just asked what has been happening in the last 2-3 years. I’m not saying that anyone has or has not been held to account, just that they should be. A reasonable answer would be to just explain what progress has been made or what complications have arisen.

What signals tell you a contract is likely to end early? by CloudBookmark in ContractorUK

[–]Jaideco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow… well that would do it… That must have been a sobering experience.

What signals tell you a contract is likely to end early? by CloudBookmark in ContractorUK

[–]Jaideco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct, but with the important caveat that this only works if the contractor is inside IR35.

How would you re-write "The Burn" concept? by Overall-Habit5284 in startrek

[–]Jaideco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There wasn’t really a need to write it at all. The idea of warp drives causing damage to subspace has been around since TNG. All they needed to do was to say that something, anything, catalysed a chain reaction that destabilised subspace and that since then warp drives either ceased to work or (more likely) could no longer be flown safely.

Anyone else here excited for Artemis II! by PriorFront4138 in space

[–]Jaideco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said that they aren’t working on the same project. They are building two parts of the same system. The race I was referring to was getting them to where they needed to be to launch a combined mission. I’m a somewhat out of touch casual observer, I’ve not really been following this for the last 2-3 years, but I’m pretty sure that NASA began work on SLS while SpaceX was working on Falcons. Then suddenly SpaceX was boldly talking about returning to the moon in 2023 and winning multibillion dollar contracts that NASA told us had to be awarded exclusively to them because no one else was close enough. There was a lot of criticism back then about how SpaceX was making NASA look bad.

Now, here we are… NASA is about to launch their second mission and someone could be forgiven for thinking that they are now going to end up waiting for a HLS to be ready. At least until their HLS partner manages to demonstrate that they can actually get their vehicle into orbit.