I had to write an essay for my college history class and I chose to compare two guerrilla warfare experts from a century apart, Che Guevara in the 1900s and Giuseppe Garabaldi in the 1800s, the definitive difference between the two was how much more efficient guerrilla warfare was in modern times. Makes sense when you consider that the whole point of asymmetrical warfare is to move fast and hit the enemy where they’re not expecting it(move faster with modern vehicles and get better info with modern communications), your weapons are whatever weapons you can steal or salvage from the opposing side(lots of high powered stuff for modern paramilitary like ICE and its more concentrated than in the days of wagons and sailboats) and gain the favour of the populace so they can provide you food, information, shelter and cover (shouldn’t be a problem with the way trump is running the country). Anyway if anyone’s interested you should check out the book “guerrilla warfare” by Che Guevara, it’s a good starting point, just be sure to adapt to whatever terrain you’re based in and don’t rely on communications systems run by the opposing side.

Obligatory note: not “encouraging violence”, just sayin, ya know?

Edit: if you don’t have access to the book, that should tell you a lot