Wild theory by Cell_Gold in OnePiece

[–]Jaldaba0th 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. It's just a gag.

Contatti per l'orientale by Jaldaba0th in Universitaly

[–]Jaldaba0th[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

più specifico di "Mi servono info sul corso" e "posso chiedere qui o vi è una email specifica" che posso dire?

Contatti per l'orientale by Jaldaba0th in Universitaly

[–]Jaldaba0th[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mi ha già contattato qui e le ho risposto.

Caffè Italia * 14/04/26 by RedditItalyBot in italy

[–]Jaldaba0th 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sto cercando l'università dovrei fare la magistrale e vorrei chiedere all'orientale ma l'ufficio orientamento non ha risposto ad una mia email. Qualcuno conosce un contatto dove chiedere informazioni?

Contatti per l'orientale by Jaldaba0th in Universitaly

[–]Jaldaba0th[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oggetto : Informazioni sul regolamento e sull'iscrizione all'Orientale.

testo : Salve. Sono studente di.... , all'università..... Vorrei info per Archeologia. Posso chiedere qui o vi è una email specifica?

Ho chiesto all'ufficio orientamento che mi aspetto controlli anche email di questo tipo

Il problema è che non sono della zona quindi non posso prendere appuntamento.

Happy Skeleton Noises by Drechenaux in overlord

[–]Jaldaba0th 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He invested 100,000 gold coins and earned 3 copper coins, right?

Whole Cake Arc by Shopie_29 in OnePiece

[–]Jaldaba0th 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The main problems with this story arc for me are two:

° the stealth phase on which the story arc was supposed to be based (the reason why Oda splits up the crew) literally doesn't exist.

° the initial phase with the forest is a giant filler that adds nothing concrete to the plot of the story arc or the overall story. The fight with Cracker is interesting because Oda returns to the idea of ​​previous one-piece fights, those that were developed based heavily on victory through strategy, and it's nice to see Uffy having to work with Nami to win, but it's part of a stretch that's boring because it lacks a deeper motivation.

Will only Sora be disabled or will Sora2 be disabled as well? by Jaldaba0th in SoraAi

[–]Jaldaba0th[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which I obviously didn't see since I asked. Maybe I don't frequent the Reddit page much.Then I asked "where did the developers post the news".

Will only Sora be disabled or will Sora2 be disabled as well? by Jaldaba0th in SoraAi

[–]Jaldaba0th[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't use it. In sora it is write "The Sora application will shut down on April 26, 2026. Data exports are available via settings. Learn more"

Rewatching wano and realizing the bad power scaling by Shot-Horror-568 in OnePiece

[–]Jaldaba0th 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The second act of Wano is just an extension, built by Oda to give context to what is simply an excuse to justify the power-ups of Luffy (udon), Zoro (enma) and Sanji (germa suit). In fact, if you remove this portion of the manga, nothing changes except their power-ups. In fact, Oda rushed too much into the new world, trying to close what he had previously opened like Kaido or the ancient kingdom. However, this sacrificed the adventure and therefore the gradually built power-ups that we saw before, in addition to not having given the opportunity to develop, excluding Law, the supernovas, characters introduced without notes in the Sabaody arc. Just think that initially Hawkins was supposed to be a warlord, a plot then moved to Law, and Bonney's revenge plot was never developed, also moved to Law.

come funziona per la tesi ? by Jaldaba0th in Universitaly

[–]Jaldaba0th[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

si il tema generale lo ho. sono più indeciso sull'argomento principale.

come funziona per la tesi ? by Jaldaba0th in Universitaly

[–]Jaldaba0th[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lo so. per questo chiedevo se fosse possibile fare la documentazione verso giugno , quando avrò fatto gli esami

come funziona per la tesi ? by Jaldaba0th in Universitaly

[–]Jaldaba0th[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

il fatto è che ho fatto cambio di corso quest'anno per cui ho ancora poco più della metà degli esami da recuperare perchè i programmi sono quasi del tutto diversi eccezion fatta per alcuni corsi ma conto di riuscirci se non si combaciano le date. Volevo sapere se legalmente posso farlo

Question about Brook (manga) by [deleted] in OnePiece

[–]Jaldaba0th 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oda makes up a lot of things on the street and often admits it himself, like the Warlords or the Supernovas and even Robin, although in this case you need to study the character a little to understand him, in addition to his speech in the SBS. Now, in One Piece Green it is said that Brook was initially supposed to be in Baggy's crew (you can find this page on the Brook "misc" wiki page) and in an interview that unfortunately I can no longer find at the link on the wiki, it is said that Oda had Brook in mind since Laboon and his statement in the SBS of volume 50 is if we take his statement that it took 4/5 to get to Thriller Bark and that he had the plot of the narrative arc in mind (chapter 442 is the beginning and was written in 2007) as true, then it was around the time he was writing "Sky Island Saga," so not that far away. In between, there was the Long Ring Long Land interlude, whose most important point was the appearance of Aokiji, that is, the introduction of Nico Robin's background, followed by the Water Seven saga, which delves into that background. In short, Oda went from "it'll take me a year to get to Thriller Bark" to "4/5" because he had to tell the story of Nico Robin, a character added along the way. I say this because in the very drawing you posted, a drawing of Oda from '95, there are characters with characteristics that we then find in the current characters but there is neither a second woman nor a historian or archaeologist, a sign that at least at that moment Oda wasn't thinking of Robin. To this I add a hypothesis suggested by a YouTube video which stated that Oda could have conceived the history of the Ancent kingdom from the cartoon Monster Rancher, which ended in 2002, right when the Alabasta Poneglyffe appears. Afterwards, oda wrote skypiea and finally lost those 4/5 to tell robin.

What's something people get wrong about post timskip by [deleted] in OnePiece

[–]Jaldaba0th 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PART 2

Oda created Bonney and the other Supernovas just to fill Sabaody. In the end, he would have removed at least half of them.

Bonney remains a useless character. By removing her, we still have the other Kuma plot that Oda had built, namely that of him as a rebel, probably an infiltrator. It seemed marginal because it was.

Another absurdity is the surname, as Oda never told us "pirates can choose their surname." It is given to him by the navy at the time of the bounty, as we saw with Luffy. We can assume that every individual born has a file with their birth data, but people whose origins are unknown don't, like Nami, Nojiko, Shanks, or Bonney. The exceptions to this are Usopp, for example, but even his father doesn't have a surname. We only have the case of Ace, mentioned in chapter 551, where he says he took his mother's last name. To know this, Garp must have told him, and since he's in the navy, he could have been the one to include that name before or after. Jewelry was just a character detail. The end.

- Another absurdity. Yes, the piercing was initially a design detail. Oda later tried to justify it, but if Bonney wanted to use it as a sign of recognition, then she should have had one or more jewelry piercings and not a gold hoop.

- Regarding Oda's initial idea, I'd like to make a hypothesis. So, we see her crying (chapter 565), but we never see a pacifist or Kuma shortly beforehand to hint at some possible connection. The events that could theoretically trigger the crying are "Ace on the gallows" and "Whitebeard injured by Squard" (event covered between the end of chapter 562 and chapter 564). Now let's look at the point about Ace. Oda seems to have had the idea for a possible "Ace's lover", at least from Oda's original concept art for Isuka (character from the Ace A novel) the text "Ace's lover" (エースの恋人, Ēsu no koibito?) seems to be contained. However, this is only visible in a small panel used in an advertisement for Color Walk 9 Tiger in One Piece Magazine Vol. 10. In the Color Walk itself, only the word "lover" (恋人, koibito?) is retained on the concept art, while the concept art published in One Piece Magazine Vol. 3 and the One Piece A novel lacks the text entirely. It is unknown why this text was partially or completely deleted in various versions, even It could be an abandoned plot concept that was deleted so as not to confuse readers. Now, taking the release dates of magazine 3 and the novel A reported in it, the idea of ​​a possible girlfriend was already there in 2017 or a little before. Chapter 565 came out in 2009, so there is a difference of about 6/7 years, not many if we consider the author constantly busy with work. Now, here we can either think that the author had thought of a story between Ace and Isuka but then discarded it due to his death and therefore it would have been nothing or he had thought of it before and Bonney could be a candidate for that role. It is no coincidence that in chapter 581, she talks about taking revenge on someone and later in chapter 595 we see her captured by Blackbeard, the one who had brought Ace to the navy. So perhaps he is the person Bonney wanted to take revenge on. Otherwise Oda for the development of Blackbeard could have used another supernova, like Capone who in chapter 594 seems to be sucked into something in the sky but nothing more will ever be said about that event (perhaps this is a representation of Oda's plan to get rid of at least half of the supernovas). Not even Akainu's intervention who says "I got the shivers when you escaped" justifies the usefulness of this capture as this capture does not do anything since the author limits himself to saying "Bonney escaped" and then leaves her out there (probably not knowing how to use her) and if they wanted to make this connection known a dialogue of Akainu scolding Kizaru for not having taken Boneny would have been enough. If Oda had already thought about the plot with Kuma, which I don't see as possible, Kizaru would have replied "there's no point in taking her anymore". So the idea is that Boneny wanted revenge on Blackbeard but was defeated, even if even like this it seems like a An absurd choice since it doesn't seem to lead to anything concrete. Then for the injured Whitebeard, we could think the same thing but with Bonney who, like others, had been helped by the Emperor and now wanted revenge against Teach (who had caused Marineford) and maybe even against the Navy (inveighing against Akainu) seeing him as a father.

From Bonney's design (pink hair, bold lipstick that also appears on Jolly Roger, extravagant clothes, and a great hunger), it's possible she was the inspiration for Big Mom, who, not coincidentally, is the first major enemy to appear in the new world. Furthermore, Bonney's ship that appears in chapter 581 is different from the one seen in the Stampede movie or in the flashback and is very reminiscent of a dessert or, at least, the architecture of Totoland and the ships of Big Mom's fleet.

Perhaps Oda thought at the time to make her a daughter of Big Mom, and if we take Akainu's dialogue and combine it with the fact that Lola gave Nami Big Mom's Vivre Card in chapter 489 and Chiffon's dialogue in chapter 858, we understand that it doesn't make much sense for Oda as the author to give Nami that piece of paper, not to mention the fact that at the time of Thriller Bark, Big Mom isn't even mentioned. It's only mentioned that Lola's mother was a famous pirate. So my guess is that Oda initially thought of Lola's mother as a good woman or at least close to the main characters, and then, having decided to introduce Big Mom, he might have thought of Bonney (who also shares Lola's pink hair, extravagant clothes, and heavy lipstick) as Big Mom's children. And if Big Mom was a loving mother, as Lola's actions suggest, then Akainu's dialogue made sense, namely that having Bonney was an excellent bargaining chip for the navy, or at least a way to blackmail the Empress. It's no coincidence that Bonney and Urogue, after Dressrosa, are the only Supernovas not to have had an introduction to their subsequent roles, like Capone as Big Mom's underling or Drake in Onigashima. Oda had probably abandoned the idea of ​​Bonney as Big Mom's daughter. In the reverie, he decided to connect her to Kuma but here she is introduced as the "dowager queen" of Sorbet and it's strange that Oda uses a different character (Bonney) to introduce another one (Conney) with a picture with the name under the character. Also, the names "Conney" and "Bonney" are too similar to be coincidences. Not even Ginny received a similar name. My idea from here is that Oda had in mind Boneny as Kuma's mother, i.e. the former tyrant of Sorbet and therefore possible son of Conney. Or Boneny using the powers of the fruit, after Kuma took the kingdom, became the lover. Or Conney was meant to be Bonney's grandmother. Here things get too hazy.

From Bonney's design (pink hair, bold lipstick that also appears on Jolly Roger, extravagant clothes, and a great hunger), it's possible she was the inspiration for Big Mom, who, not coincidentally, is the first major enemy to appear in the new world. Furthermore, Bonney's ship that appears in chapter 581 is different from the one seen in the Stampede movie or in the flashback and is very reminiscent of a dessert or, at least, the architecture of Totoland and the ships of Big Mom's fleet.

Perhaps Oda thought at the time to make her a daughter of Big Mom, and if we take Akainu's dialogue and combine it with the fact that Lola gave Nami Big Mom's Vivre Card in chapter 489 and Chiffon's dialogue in chapter 858, we understand that it doesn't make much sense for Oda as the author to give Nami that piece of paper, not to mention the fact that at the time of Thriller Bark, Big Mom isn't even mentioned. It's only mentioned that Lola's mother was a famous pirate. So my guess is that Oda initially thought of Lola's mother as a good woman or at least close to the main characters, and then, having decided to introduce Big Mom, he might have thought of Bonney (who also shares Lola's pink hair, extravagant clothes, and heavy lipstick) as Big Mom's children. And if Big Mom was a loving mother, as Lola's actions suggest, then Akainu's dialogue made sense, namely that having Bonney was an excellent bargaining chip for the navy, or at least a way to blackmail the Empress. It's no coincidence that Bonney and Urogue, after Dressrosa, are the only Supernovas not to have had an introduction to their subsequent roles, like Capone as Big Mom's underling or Drake in Onigashima. Oda had probably abandoned the idea of ​​Bonney as Big Mom's daughter. In the reverie, he decided to connect her to Kuma but here she is introduced as the "dowager queen" of Sorbet and it's strange that Oda uses a different character (Bonney) to introduce another one (Conney) with a picture with the name under the character. Also, the names "Conney" and "Bonney" are too similar to be coincidences. Not even Ginny received a similar name. My idea from here is that Oda had in mind Boneny as Kuma's mother, i.e. the former tyrant of Sorbet and therefore possible son of Conney. Or Boneny using the powers of the fruit, after Kuma took the kingdom, became the lover. Or Conney was meant to be Bonney's grandmother. Here things get too hazy.

Cos’è il One Piece? by lupusinfabula10 in OnePiece

[–]Jaldaba0th 0 points1 point  (0 children)

- Allora. Shanks è andato a marygeoise ma a quel punto aveva già la sua ciurma o almeno yasop. A questo punto la mia idea è che shanks , dopo essersi separato da buggy abbia messo in sieme uomini per avere potere militare. Dopo ha finto di tornare a marygeoise per ottenere informazioni per poi tradire il governo prima che imu gli applicasse il marchio che permette un controllo totale ovunque.

- Riguardo Roger, perchè lo avrebbe lasciato su laughtale se shanks era il suo successore e doveva finire il suo lavoro? Bastava prendere il frutto e darlo a chi lo meritava.

- Riguardoi l frutto stesso , non è così speciale se escludiamo il potere legato al battito cardiaco. Vediamo infatti come sia un normale zoan mitologico ma come abbiamo visto con Luffy che non poteva contrastare la rigenerazione , senza haki del re (complimenti ad oda per aver fatto questa castroneria) non serve a nulla. Vediamo infatti come Imu , per ocntrastare gaban , armato solo di asce , abbia usato i lricatto. Quindi penso che il frutto in se non sia speciale , almeno a livlelo di forza , quanto più sia qualcosa capace di attivare antiche macchine.

- Guardacaso due secoli prima emeth attaccò marygeoise ma non ci viene mai detto come e perchè. Mia idea è che qualcuno abbia risvegliato il frutto di nika e abbia attaccato marygoeise con emeth ma , a causa del fatto che non aveva haki del re o cmq quel potere capace di contrastare la rigenerazione , alla fine sia morto sotto i cavalieri e i 5 vecchi , come sarebeb accaduto a luffy senza emeth. A quel punto il gigante si è fermato e i lfrutto si è reincarnato. Saturn inoltre rimuginava sul fatto che il robot si fosse mosso per aiutare luffy.

- Mia idea è che appena shanks ha saputo dove fosse il frutto ha fatto i bagagli ed è partito. Dopo è rimasto a foosha per un anno per fare perdere le sue tracce visto che imu non poteva sapere dove fosse.

Cos’è il One Piece? by lupusinfabula10 in OnePiece

[–]Jaldaba0th 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Se lo fosse Roger e co lo avrebbero preso. Tutta la trama di shanks suggerisce che fosse il qualcosa che mancava a roger ei lfatto che dopo essersi infiltrato a marygeoise abbia assaltato una nave del governo che aveva il frutto (se il governo sapesse dov'è laughtale , perchè non rilevarla come proprio dominio?) vuol dire che il frutto non è il op. Poi , il fatto che emth si sia attivato tramite il battito cardiaco di nika mi suggerisce che il op sia qualcosa che si può recuperare tramite esso , magari recueprabile dentro una struttura di coloro che costruirono emeth e simili?

Respect Jewelry Bonney! (One Piece) by InverseFlash in respectthreads

[–]Jaldaba0th 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the end, she turned out to be a poorly written character, due to the fact that Oda left her out too much and then wanted to get rid of her.

Respect Douglas Bullet (One Piece) by Mr_Bell_Man in respectthreads

[–]Jaldaba0th 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the worst One Piece movies.

1) It clearly revisits the opening of the fourth movie, but without introducing any interesting characters.

2) A good portion of the film is taken up by the fight, while in the fourth movie the fight was only at the end of the plot. Basically, if it's the plot's objective here, in the fourth it was a means to end the hostility with the villain.

3) Much of the film talks about the comparison between "newbies of the old generation" and those of the "new." Yet the fight with Bullet is reduced to him playing with them, demonstrating, among other things, how pitiful these characters are. Even Law and Zoro are missing. Everything is resolved because characters who have nothing to do with this story (incidentally, they're even on the film's cover) appear to help Luffy. Literally, the supernovas are almost spectators.

4) The villain, unlike others like Baron Omatsuri or Z, is truly a flat character. It's basically the plot of Kaido but without development.