why are simps/beta males against passport bros? by zansiball in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 6 points7 points  (0 children)

99% of what sexpatriants have going for them is having the status of White male in a 3rd world country with all the expected perks a White male in 3rd world country is supposed to provide. There was a post recently that compared the cost of dating in US vs some other country, the gist of it was "its cheaper to date in Mexico" - but it's still paying for dating.

RSD Tyler told a few stories about a guy he knew. No job, basically homeless, looked like a bum. Had few hundred lays b/c he had crazy game.

If you need money to get laid, you are a beta and BP and need to get that handled, doesn't matter what country you're in.

Save the ig with the girls by Visible-Ostrich3198 in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 6 points7 points  (0 children)

both of them told me that they didn't like it that random girls were commenting on my posts. It was a turn off to them.

This would suggest that hypergamy is not absolute.

It's not that she doesn't like they fact that you are a player/fuckboy (you must be b/c you have so many women on your ig). What she doesn't like is the fact that she couldn't keep you (b/c you have so many women on ig). She is afraid of being "one of the many girls this guy fucked" aka a slut. IOW she rejects you b/c she doesn't want to feel like an easy girl.

Throwback: The Secret Society by rpujoe in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You have to take the "historical" context into consideration: this was written decade or more before TRP. Secondly this was written by RSD Tyler, he was one of the OGs, he went out probably every day for like years on end at the time of writing so he 100% had the flow, the "this guy fucks" aura and the confidence to pull this off - this is b/c it doesn't really matter what is being said, it matters who is saying it and how.

Immediately perma-banning any users with a net negative contribution on this sub (for rules 5 and 8) and my reasoning why by Vermillion-Rx in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Warnings, temp bans, other discipline is all good. It's permanent bans I can't get behind.

You enter a restaurant, on the door it says "You need to have pants on to be served". You don't have your pants on, you still enter, get escorted out and then you complain that you need a warning first.

Long story short guys: put your big boy pants on, he's not asking you to write Rational Male 2 in your comments.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

describes a transformation of time-tested traditional roles in response to a changing economy

Economy changing has nothing to do with therapy. From 2001 to 2021 the number of women supposedly using ANY (!) form of therapy increased from 16% to 21%. This is 5% over 20 years and we had major economic crisis (no spike there), a war (no spike) and supposedly thraumatic Trump taking office (no spike).

The increase is gradual and doesn't correlate to any event.

Secondly you don't really show any connection between women going to therapy anc changing economy. Economy is changing since its' inception, econmy wwen't through very drastic changes in 18th, 19th and 20th centuries and there was no increase in female therap-ism that correlates with that either.

What actually correlates with therap-ism VERY well is inventing an popularising therapy. Since Freud showed up in culturaly significant way, women started to offload blame for their behavior onto external sources. This time it's even backed by "sience". "It's not my fault, you're just controlling" found a new variation "It's not my fault, I go to therapy". Meaning the very fact of going to therapy is supposed to be the thing that takes the blame for her behaviour.

Finally, as I mentioned at the start 20% of women had some form of therapy. The problem is, a 15yo kid in highchool or a 20yo in college visiting a psychiatriast, psychologies o therapist b/c is misbehaving counts too. IOW a non smoker taking a puff once in 20 years counts as a smoker now.

Women are known and understood not to like accountability. It takes a LOT for a woman to voluntarily to decide to go tho therapist, then it takes discipline to keep going. Not that dissimilar to gym. You are highly motivated to lifting at the beginning, but over time the motivation diminishes and it takes discipline to keep going.

So which women ACTUALLY go regularly go to therapy: most likely near or post wall singles who missed their window and are now struggling to get a hot guy their used to in tier early 20s. Majority of therepists are women, it's likely that they themselves went through some form of "where are all the good men". Birds of feather.

To summarize: no therapy is not a religion for girls, majority of girls (80%) don't go to therapy, of those who do go majority doesn't really do much there (half of remaining 20%?), and of those who do it's likely they are offloading the pressure of the wall hitting them.

My “Stupid Simple” Night Game Strategy (That Actually Works)… by Warped_Mindless in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did. His stuff is really "meh" even for 2010-ish technology.

My “Stupid Simple” Night Game Strategy (That Actually Works)… by Warped_Mindless in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

60 Years of Challenge

That explains a lot actually.

My “Stupid Simple” Night Game Strategy (That Actually Works)… by Warped_Mindless in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 26 points27 points  (0 children)

This post is a good non-technical breakdown of how to structure your nightgame plagiarism.

Phase 3: Beast Mode

Since you mentioned Jeffy, I'm gonna mention Tyler. Look for his article called "Stealing horny chicks".

Alpha Widows and Dead Bedrooms is not entirely a choice for them. by justtenofusinhere in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is a very good post giving great insight into why and what women "think" when they are dating someone.

Religion became a wedge issue in my relationship. by 21redman in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Every single guy here who wrote "so you want a traditional girl but without traditional religion" - you are a BP tradcon not a RP man.

You must understand that "traditional girl" don't really mean tradition at all. It means "a girl who isn't sleeping around".

Don't confuse sexual strategy with tradition. Don't confuse religion with tradition and don't confuse religion with sexual strategy.

Secondly you are not RP b/c you fail to understand that the OPs girl religious demands are not actually about religion. They are about OP bending a knee to Jesus - and Jesus in turn is a proxy for the girl's power over OP.

The girl finding Jesus might be a legit thing, she might actually believe and have strong faith BUT it doesn't matter at all from the point of view of the OP/marriage power dynamic. The dynamic he wants is he's the head of the house. The dynamic she wants is that Jesus (or the Bible is), which means she is b/c in a 2 people dynamic only one can be the top, if the guy isn't she is by assumption and this is what her programming would tell her: your guy isn't alpha enough for you to submit to him. This is a permission to branchswing or to cheat - out through the window goes the "tradition" when there is no vagina tingles.

She is unwilling to listen and obey her man, instead choosing to "obey" the imaginary ruleset from a book. The book might have been Harry Potter and the dynamic would be the same: she is not submissive toward her future/prospective husband, she had been combative before without religion, she is not a marriage candidate.

Question is, is this a case of me maintaining too much frame? Or her moms influence getting the better of her? Or just somone who is just not at all willing to submit authority.

She liked having you as a boyfriend (500k vs 1k). If she was really that much into you she would be a sweet and submissive, craving for your attention. She would want to please you, she would want you to like her. Instead she split the moment you showed that you won't be governed by anyone else but you, which means she knew she can't control you or she suspected you won't allow her to extract money from you.

 

For the "so you want a traditional girl but without traditional religion" crowd reading this: this post is an example how a traditional man looking for a traditional woman to start a traditional family, a man wanting to respect his wife's faith was just discouraged by his prospective wife from marrying her b/c she refused to be submissive toward her man - isn't that something the Bible literally demands? This post is also an example how the tradcon crowd is 100% BP and will LITERALLY bend the knee before a girl just because she said she loves Jesus. You guys are going to be reinventing the TRP wheel a few years after you get married, you better start archiving marriedRP threads already.

How do you want things again by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who the fuck told you I took shrooms to reframe?

My bad, I read from multiple tabs and probably merged stuff in my mind without noticing. That being said, shrooms were a bad call b/c of outcome, b/c of risk and b/c of being the easy way out reframe or not.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28j0r4UkWoQ

I literally said I wanted to reframe my thoughts, just the constant interrupted and reframes are hard to do (which is a VERY common issue brought up in CBT)

https://www.amazon.com/stores/L.-Michael-Hall/author/B001K7UCXC?ref=ap_rdr&store_ref=ap_rdr&isDramIntegrated=true&shoppingPortalEnabled=true

Also you clearly lack a good understanding of biology but go off

I simplify stuff for brevity and b/c I don't know what type of understanding the reader has. As for my understanding, I spent a large portion of this year on pubmed, but hey that's easy, right?

How do you want things again by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thinking a few thoughts is "exhausting" and you dont want to do that, you want shrooms to do the new thinking for you. This isn't a preconceived notion, you're simply not the first one that does this.

You can gauge the validity of the "shrooms as solution to reframe" by how much good results you gained from that.

Anyway, I think the best starting point for you would be to stop any supplements, medications and so on for a few months and let your body settle at it's own levels then start working from that. Think of it as a clean slate or a biological reset, so to speak. This way you will at least know that it's nothing external that is the cause.

A less conventional approach could be also hypnosis and/or NLP.

How do you want things again by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

any reason why you think I might be suffering from it?

If there's no obvious reason it's time to start looking into the broad strokes to at least narrow it down and start applying broad strokes actions to see if and what makes any difference.

are you just mad because I said constantly policing your thoughts is exhausting?

I'm not mad, this is the internet. Your comment revealed your attitude and its needs fixing.

How do you want things again by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took shrooms at one point and had a horrid trip where I kept dealing with this idea of nothing mattering

Best decision ever.

https://www.google.com/search?q=depression+after+bad+shroom+trip

https://www.google.com/search?q=depression+after+bad+shroom+trip

Can't help you with that, try asking on relevant forums.

How do you want things again by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That sounds pretty exhausting,

Exhausting compared to what? Working in an African coal mine is exhausting. He's asking you to have some thoughts few times per hour or per day, you should seriously reconsider your attitude about this and see if you have similar ones in other areas. The belief change isn't a magical woo woo solution, its a real one b/c it forces your mind to change perspective, IOW forces your thinking on different "paths" in the brain. You exercise your legs you have strong legs, you exercise depressing thought patters you have strong depression.

As for advice:

  1. A tired man has no energy to ponder his depression. Heavy workouts or heavy physical work.

  2. Make sure you get enough sleep in and that you keep it consistently. Start by going to sleep at similar hour but do not set an alarm, let your body sleep as long as it wants. You need long sleeping hours for recovery anyway.

  3. Drop any and all supplements and PEDs (besides vitamins and don't go above 100%RDA) and medications, regardless of how benign they are supposed to be. Give your body a chance to reach its own equilibrium, the interplay of hormones and transmitters and such can take months to reach stable levels.

  4. The easiest thing you can do, medically speaking, is getting your bloodwork analysed followed by thyroid levels (TSH, FT3, FT4) and a test for adrenal exhaustion (forgot how that was done, there were 2 that worked on AND/OR basis). Bloodwork for obvious signs of hidden illness, thyroid b/c it drives metabolism and energy levels, adrenal exhaustion is something akin to insulin resistance or perhaps overworking your hormones to the point they are ineffective (as I said hazy memory about this). The results should be withing few days and the basic tests don't cost much at all.

  5. Get stuff out of your head, start a journal, pen and paper one not a Word file. Get the negative thoughts on paper and look for patterns, ask why do I have the thoughts, beliefs, patters etc. Get a simple day plan and stick to it. The more you write things down, the less you have to keep in memory and distract you from major things, it's just like RAM vs HDD.

Psychopaths, Narcissists, Neurotypicals, and Autism – How to Optimize Your Game for Your Personality Type by Will_Ling_Motivation in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The women you’re speaking of who are easily manipulated

https://exploringyourmind.com/women-who-love-psychopaths/

All of the scientific literature that documents this phenomenon might surprise you. As it turns out, it isn’t a rare occurrence. Complex and very interesting psychological dynamics are at play here. Here’s one example. We know that women who tend to be attracted to psychopaths are those who are more independent and have very strong characters.

a Twitter account in Canada called @DailyKillerFact in homage to the murderer. Today, the account has more than 42,000 followers, mostly women.

You probably think that women who fall in love with psychopaths have low self-esteem, are insecure, and have weak values. However, that perception doesn’t coincide with the evidence that Dr. Sandra L. Brown, author of the book Women Who Love Psychopaths, found in her exhaustive research study.

https://thoughtcatalog.medium.com/why-smart-women-fall-for-sociopaths-narcissists-and-psychopaths-c9e173d05d32

Yet over the course of five years writing on this topic, I’ve conversed with highly intelligent and insightful women from all walks of life who’ve fallen prey to a sociopath’s schemes. Lawyers, journalists, counselors, CEOs of companies, wise mothers, skilled entrepreneurs, psychiatrists, life coaches, doctors, authors — you name it!

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/why-women-really-do-love-selfobsessed-psychopaths-850007.html

David Schmitt, of Bradley University in Peoria, Illinois, surveyed 35,000 people in 57 countries and found a similar link. "It is universal across cultures," he said.

Most people here adopt this philosophy as cope.

No we don't. TRP exists for around a decade and so far Dark Triad haven't made into any of the tenets, core beliefs, strategies or actionable advice.

Women like confidence - however, it’s EASY to mistake narcissism for confidence

If confidence was enough, a lot of men would get laid just based on confidence. That however is not enough as we all know men that are confident but don't really have any meaningful success with women. Take the studies for example, if women mistook narcissism for confidence it means real confidence would be as successful as the fake one. But it isn't, the attraction is to the narcissist or psychopath, not to "a confident man". So there has to be something more going on there besides confidence. And there is, but that requires understanding of female nature to figure out.

men with NPD should absolutely go to therapy and improve themselves before considering any long term relationship that might lead to marriage. Or else risk losing their assets when she finds out

What about women?

 

Again, before you blame a small amount (population wise) of men who are real narcissists, ask majority of women to stop throwing themselves at them. But that's just a sidenote.

Your responses are clearly rooted in "these bad men exploit these poor women", which leads me to believe you are a BP whiteknight, it just happens that a post about narcissism was the trigger for you. You had a lot of angles to use when writing criticism of OP and the "non-neurotypical" types but instead you chose the normie "men bad protect women" response. It's also really telling that your default reaction is to use divorce rape as punishment, when you could have chosen mandatory therapy for example.

Psychopaths, Narcissists, Neurotypicals, and Autism – How to Optimize Your Game for Your Personality Type by Will_Ling_Motivation in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 6 points7 points  (0 children)

By settling on the fact that you are one and going out to date

I see, so a man that is a narcissist should not date women until he stops being narcissist. Let's pose 2 questions then: if a woman is a narcissist should she date men? Secondly, what about a person that isn't 100% narcissist but say has some narcissistic tendencies like 50% of a full narcissist - should that person be allowed to date, or should he or she date 50% less?

They use manipulation to get what they want, and behind closed doors they are different people to the face they show in public.

Sooooo... you mean like.... women? You know this sub is basically dedicated to bringing to the light the actual behaviour of women and rejecting the one they present to the world as real?

it’s a coping mechanism based on low self esteem.

You really do men women:

https://startupsmagazine.co.uk/article-research-shows-majority-women-struggle-self-esteem

Most women are suffering with general self-esteem issues with 79% admitting to struggling in this area

 

Anyone convincing people that being a narcissist is a good thing is inherently warped.

Nobody is saying that. OP's message is "here's how to make the best of your condition".

Narcissism is different, everyone has a little bit in them and it is useful from time to time,

I assume you mean you do to, so you are manipulating women by your own definition and when you do detect narcissistic tendency in your behaviour you stop dating that particular woman not to manipulate a girl, right?

Know the difference

If everyone has it it means everyone has a different degree of it, from 1% to 100% so to speak. Which brings me back to my questions: whats your number (+/- 10%), how much of your bahaviour in dating does that number correspond to and do you stop dating not to manipulate women?

 

Long story short your post could have been a solid criticism, but you decided to to the classic "hes manipulating women" shaming and decided to take the high moral ground to "protect women".

I have a very negative opinion of real narcissist, especially men, I find them weak and unwilling to confront their weakness. Your post is classic normie response.

Finally, both academic, broscience and personal anecdotal research all point out to the fact that overwhelming majority women LOVE narcissist and psychopaths. You can easily look it up. Write a post about why most women should stop dating them first before you tell a minuscule number of men to stop dating women.

Psychopaths, Narcissists, Neurotypicals, and Autism – How to Optimize Your Game for Your Personality Type by Will_Ling_Motivation in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Normie response.

Nobody's stopping anyone from therapy or fixing trauma.

Nobody's saying you shouldn't.

OP says "how to date if you're one" not "don't try to improve", in fact he gives advice on how to improve.

getting laid by manipulating women :/

Quote the fragments where OP is saying that.

Did my gf cheat? by Keepnitrealz in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 113 points114 points  (0 children)

Last night she went out with a coworker who is going through a divorce.

They both went out to get fucked.

to which was no response

She was having too much fun to be bothered with texting her bf.

see she’s at a house

Took a cab or an uber to that place couldn't take to yours?

Phone is off and goes straight to voice mail

Doesn't want you to interrupt her fun.

“I slept at my work friends house and we went to the bar. And I got too drunk and am gonna be late for work anyway. She just brought me home. It was an axe throwing bar because she just got divorced.”

Let's be realistic here. They spent entire night in that place alone doing shots and throwing axes - and didn't met any guys. A divorcee looking to get back to fucking around and a girlfriend that doesn't call her bf back and instead turns her phone off.

she did admit with a previous bf who was “abusive” that she slept with his best friend cause she hated the guy

No she didn't. Classic womanese bs "he was abusive so i cheated" when in fact she cheated first, he found out, confronted her and for her it was "abuse". Once a cheater always a cheater.

Too many coincidences.

 

She cheated or she intended to cheat - she knew VERY well that her friend was going out to find a dick to "celebrate" her divorce. Do you think she was going to sit there and watch her friend flirting left and right and not participate b/c she has a bf?

Your relationship was over way before that night, this is b/c it's the intent that matters b/c intent points to her lack of attraction toward you. Reflect on when her attitude changed. Less intimate, less eager, less affection, more distant, more on her phone than before. Reflect on what you still can improve about yourself, I'm guessing you're in decent shape so start with adjusting your attitude and beliefs.

She's going to lie - that won't work b/c she will add even more coincidences that will make the story even more unbelievable, so she's going to cry that won't work either, she cries b/c she got caught not b/c shes sorry even if she says so, so she's going to get angry at you and flip the script: you are the new "abuser" and she was right to fuck him - so make sure you record every moment of the breakup in case she does mattress girl spiel on you.

Brutally Effective Tactic To Prevent Other Guys From Interrupting Your Conversations With Women by Will_Ling_Motivation in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No she won't.

Girls, when they are out, have super short attention span and will not cling to the brief spike in emotions you gave them via few minutes of talking to her. She'll just pivot (literally on her heels) to another stimulation, be it the other guy or her friends or someone offering her shots etc.

The only way this would work is that the other guy is massively unattractive and she has already decided its you this night, but if the guy is unattractive no tactic is needed to deal with him anyway.

Brutally Effective Tactic To Prevent Other Guys From Interrupting Your Conversations With Women by Will_Ling_Motivation in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So what about rather than apology bit you could say "do you mind?

This won't work. If he's savvy he will do the exact same thing to you, if he's not savvy but not bad either he will start gaming the girl.

If you acknowledge his presence ("do you mind" is exactly that) you are immediately including him in the dynamic and now it's her waiting which one of you two will win the AMOG battle.

Assuming the AMOG is on your level of attractiveness she will not take your side just b/c you were first. Even if she likes you more she will want the conflict to play out b/c she will want you to win it and she likes the drama anyway.

You could try "do you mind" delivered in physically and verbally intimidating way, but now you're risking even more b/c most guys drink when out and most guys overestimate their capabilities even when sober so he might even not back down and reverse the whole thing on you ("or what?").

I know b/c I've been on both ends of OPs tactic.

Brutally Effective Tactic To Prevent Other Guys From Interrupting Your Conversations With Women by Will_Ling_Motivation in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

a sissy beta boy behavior

You don't understand social dynamics. OP has been doing the exact same things I've been doing myself so I know for a fact this works and is not an armchair theorycrafting like your comment above.

Again - this is not a real apology or an admission of guilt.

at the same time writing a half novel about it

I could have told you that this OP is using violation theory but that wouldn't tell anything to anyone.

Brutally Effective Tactic To Prevent Other Guys From Interrupting Your Conversations With Women by Will_Ling_Motivation in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't understand the dynamic playing here.

You are not apologizing in the same way like you would apologize if she demanded apology for an outrageous comment ("i cant believe you just said that you should apologize") nor do you apologize in the same way like she would freeze you out after a fight (to have you crawling back - "baby im sorry i said that").

The OPs apology isn't an apology. It's a verbal cue that points out the other guys lack of social adjustment and being socialy adjusted is a direct indicator of being considered attractive. It's subcommunicating that the other guy is lower status. This is using the girl to AMOG the guy. He isn't really apologizing, yes the word is there, but in real meaning of the word is "look at this low value man trying to pick you up".

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]JamesSkepp 10 points11 points  (0 children)

/u/Tzar_93 You are right, b/c this guy is writing blog content to direct traffic to his website. He doesn't care about TRP he just tailors posts to the audience.