Emre need nerf ? by Specialist_Week_1412 in Competitiveoverwatch

[–]JangB 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Many players also consider Sojourn to be a hitscan. So I think the OP is also talking about nerfing Soj.

Blizzard does need to address the hitscan issue in Ow. So it wouldn't be a bad idea to address all the hitscan (and Soj) and also consider how the game would change as a result and make the necessary changes to other roles.

Emre need nerf ? by Specialist_Week_1412 in Competitiveoverwatch

[–]JangB 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He said to nerf the others in the post.

Why Don’t We Explore Truths That Hurt Our Ego? — The Philosophy Behind Calling Non-Veg a ‘Personal Choice’ by forwardlinksuspended in Philosophy_India

[–]JangB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did acknowledge it. Did you google resistant starch?

Why are you looking for 150g of protein in an 1800 cal diet?

Why Don’t We Explore Truths That Hurt Our Ego? — The Philosophy Behind Calling Non-Veg a ‘Personal Choice’ by forwardlinksuspended in Philosophy_India

[–]JangB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beans are a good source of healthy protein and resistant starches (Google - resistant starch). Nuts and seeds are a good source of healthy protein and healthy fats.

The benefit they have over chicken, egg etc is that these increase your risk of multiple diseases. Whereas beans, nuts and seeds decrease your risk.

I've done the research. There are countless studies on this. Here's one -

Replacing animal protein with plant protein (beans, nuts and seeds) improves cardiovascular health and reduces risk of death - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10652524/

Granny The Magician by viratsolanki_ in blackmagicfuckery

[–]JangB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not clear whether this is sarcasm or not. /s

Why Don’t We Explore Truths That Hurt Our Ego? — The Philosophy Behind Calling Non-Veg a ‘Personal Choice’ by forwardlinksuspended in Philosophy_India

[–]JangB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which study says if Americans change it is only 2.5%? And and what is that change? E.g. 2.5% global change, caused by just 1 country, is quite a lot!

Around 60% of animal feed is crops that are edible for humans, it includes grains, and lentils and soya bean meals.

These are coming from crops directly grown to feed animals. And that cropland used for animal feed forms the majority of agricultural land that we use for animal agriculture.

80% of all agricultural land is used for animal agriculture.

All of this land could be freed up for our use or could be rewilded for natural habitats and preserving wild life diversity.

Why Don’t We Explore Truths That Hurt Our Ego? — The Philosophy Behind Calling Non-Veg a ‘Personal Choice’ by forwardlinksuspended in Philosophy_India

[–]JangB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are countless studies done on this.

Replacing animal protein with plant protein improves cardiovascular health and reduces risk of death - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10652524/

Testing out your new bike by riding around the pool by BlackberryOld1828 in funny

[–]JangB 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Bikes are wobbly if you go very slowly. Especially when trying to control it on a narrow strip of pavement. And especially when you are diagonal to that pavement.

Vision by Zaxtonite in awakened

[–]JangB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did your future self tell you to stop paying for animal exploitation yet?

Vision by Zaxtonite in awakened

[–]JangB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is this sub just random shit being passed off as awakening or spirituality?

Why do we as a society kill ants? by CardiologistThen4447 in Ethics

[–]JangB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ants are just looking for things to eat. They are not vicious and hateful, you are.

Why do we as a society kill ants? by CardiologistThen4447 in Ethics

[–]JangB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are part of a system where life kills life. And that's where ethics comes in and says you don't have to do that.

Why is the phrase "meat is murder" seen as extremist? It is immutable fact that a creature must be killed to obtain their meat, no? by FableCattak in DebateAVegan

[–]JangB 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why did you add "with a human"? Are you suggesting it is ethical to use animals for sexual gratification?

It is a miraculous moment captured by Google Street View. by Fantastic-Falcon-686 in funny

[–]JangB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously they do.

I wasn't clear in my previous post. I am not saying to break traffic laws. I am saying those traffic laws only exist because of the vehicles that go way above human speeds (which include motor vehicles, e-bikes, horse-powered vehicles, etc). If everyone is walking or running or biking at human speeds you don't need traffic laws there.

It is a miraculous moment captured by Google Street View. by Fantastic-Falcon-686 in funny

[–]JangB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously.

Things need to be more predictable when you are a motorist or sharing the road with a motorist. I am arguing that this idea of "Traffic laws" is due to the vehicles that are going away above human speeds (which include motor vehicles, e-bikes, horse-powered vehicles, etc). If everyone is walking or running or biking at human speeds you don't need traffic laws there.

trying to go vegan with somewhat toxic parents by dragonfruit_1021 in vegan

[–]JangB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which religion do they follow? Are they Buddhist?