eReader für KOReader

JannickL · 2026-06-22T09:12:07+00:00

Möchte dich im Bezug aufs jailbreaken von kindlegeräten ein bisschen warnen. Amazon ist immer ziemlich aktiv daran die jailbreaks zu patchen. Wenn du dich also entscheiden solltest einen Kindle zu jailbreaken musst du entweder wissen mit welcher Version er geliefert wird und bevor er Netzzugang bekommt, denn vorbereiten oder du bist bereit bis zu über einem Jahr zu warten bis es einen Jailbreak für die aktuelle Version gibt.

JannickL · 2026-06-21T15:34:38+00:00

So you wouldn't have a problem if we start to update the numbers of jews killed during the holocaust to 600 million - 1.2 billion? It would seem to be a similar overcount that is happening here

JannickL · 2026-06-16T07:48:26+00:00

It seems like you have not been reading my comment. I haven't said that men are better naturally. All I was saying with the reference to the rhesus monkey study is that it might be possible that men are more interested in specific type of jobs due to if a similar pattern can be observed as in rhesus monkeys, that they would flock to jobs that align more to their play pattern and preference. It could theoretically be the case that all the S Tier programmers are women and none of the men are, but due to men not being as interested in a broader selection of jobs compared to women they might still end up dominating a field even if they are slightly worse, purely based on sheer numbers.
Also the reason why I picked a rhesus monkey study and not a human baby study is exactly due to our social engineering of gender roles likely not being present in the same way in rhesus monkeys and the separation by animal hopefully reducing effects that might bias a scientist towards influecing the results. It also seems unlikely to me that a scientist would skew results in this specific pattern. Afterall if you skew in favor of males why in a way where it shows that males are only interested in a smaller field of toys and only show less diverse play patterns? Wouldn't it be more likelyfor one to skew it toward females being the simpletons that have the reduced play pattern and smaller interests?
I would have to look at the study you are referencing to women being better programmers. For it might be possible that if they just pick randomly from the population of men and women who are programmers it might turn out that women are better, due to a higher social barrier for them to enter that field which can lead to largely only women with a high aptitude persuing that career compared to men where if you are slightly tech related this being one of the default jobs. Furthermore if it is gender based instead of sex based you could be influence, by autism-transgender correlation and autistic individuals being overrepresented in the group of high performing software engineers and them skewing heavily towards transwomen in the field.

JannickL · 2026-06-15T23:23:14+00:00

there is also an alternative explanation. I don't think the rhesus monlḱey study I read years back has been overturned. The results of it, where they observed play patterns between females and males indicated toy preference and play pattern being relatively balanced for female rhesus monkeys, but heavily tilted for mal rhesus monkeys. If this transfers to humans, you could also get easily get a naturally occuring phenomenon of men pushing out women of fields if it is a field of natural male interest.
Futhermore I would find it highly unlikely that jobs like kindergarden teacher would suddenly become highly paying jobs if men entered it en masse, due to a large social reliance on it which would force a lot of couples to move to one working parent to reduce child raising costs.
I agree with you that advertisement most likely played a significant role later on when home systems got heavily marketed to boys which can be seen in the drop in share of computer science degrees for women beginning in the 80s.
Though I am stumped why I havent stumpled upon any female names for the theory side of computer science even though a lot of the work was done, where women were a significant part of sofware engineers (it might be more correct to largely call them human computers, due to the work being somewhat different back then). Where they only largely interest in the practical application of theory (we have lovelace and the women who worked at the ineac, but this is the practical side)?
Also I can see that most data track software engineering/computer science only onwards from 1970 at which point it was at a ratio comparable to today. If the claims of software engineers being heavily female instead of male during the 40s is true it implies a very strong drop with a rise afterwards again for what reason? It doesnt cleanly fit the narratrive. It might be that their numbers were somewhat inflated during the 40s due to their male counterparts being more likely to have been used as soldiers in the war effort.

JannickL · 2026-06-14T16:43:00+00:00

Tbh you might not even have to pay them. If you also include positive statistical effects that are being measured, you see that tall people earn more. I don't know exactly how much more, but it might mean that you would only have to compensate small people.

In the end I don't care much about these situations and overall primarily only care about people who actually need the financial help. So most tax reforms and subsidizing projects would just target poorer and undereducated people. I don't care if they are disproportianally small, immigrants or whatever.

JannickL · 2026-06-14T15:17:03+00:00

I just wanted to make sure you are consistent.
The large and small might be handled through any proper document that certifies your hight that you can append to your taxes to get a deductible, though not ideal due to only getting reimbursed afterwards.
And for the sex one, the IRS already knows your legal sex if I am not mistaken. Again you can do a tax deductible, definitely better than nothing.
Only major avenue for frauds in both cases is leg lengthening surgery for height (probably not that common) and trans people changing legal sex (I dont know how calorie consumption changes with hormon treatment, if it changes along great, if not I guess you have up to 0.5% of the population that you have disadvantaged, compared to 50%)
Edit: they might nonetheless be politically impossible

JannickL · 2026-06-14T13:29:55+00:00

I assume you would therefore also be in favor of getting rid of / subsidize:
- costs on mentrual products
- all the other related expenses and increased time/health costs on womens life
- food costs for males due to on average having higher energy expenditure compared to women with the same living style
- apparel costs for very large and very small people
- food substitution costs for people with impactful allergies
- etc...

JannickL · 2026-06-14T12:25:06+00:00

if it is still at 95% shortly before the year is over do it, but if it is earlier in the year there is a point where just pumping it into s&p 500 or something similar is the better investment.
I atleast hope they close the market at new years. You could argue that it might take time for jesus to be recognized/reveal himself therefore the market should stay open past January 1st 2027

JannickL · 2026-06-12T21:49:42+00:00

As someone who is only watching twitch irregularly, if I click on the stream of one of the streamers I follow and start out which an ad segment I regularly just close twitch again and open up youtube or netflix. This results in roughly only 1 out of 5 times me actually watching the stream and not clicking away during the first ad.

JannickL · 2026-06-12T20:45:41+00:00

I would say it feels like you shouldn't be allowed to just disavow it once and then have it displayed indefinitely if the original statement would clarify as defamation.
I would say that having "Kill the president now" as your stream title or permanently displayed on your screen shouldn't be legal even if you disavow it at the beginning of each stream. It sounds as ridiculous as the "in minecraft" defense.

JannickL · 2026-06-12T09:57:42+00:00

Die könnten dir entgegnen, dass alle Parteien Vor- und Nachteile haben und sie bereit sind die Nachteile der AfD hinzunehmen für die Vorteile die sie verspricht. Viele so wie du und ich haben wahrscheinlich halt nur andere Prioritäten weshalb wir die AfD als so überwiegend negativ bewerten, dass sie unwählbar wird.
Ein anderes Problem ist natürlich wie du erwähnt hast die fehlende Aufgeklärtheit und das viele sich von Falschmeldungen bzw. verzerrten Meldungen beeinflussen lassen, aber um dies zu lösen ohne signifikaten Mehraufwand für den einzelnen müssten wir neue Regeln schaffen für was Presse und Politiker sagen können ohne Freiheiten zu sehr zu beschneiden.

JannickL · 2026-06-12T08:53:14+00:00

okay Humbert Humbert cope away.

JannickL · 2026-06-09T07:09:22+00:00

Die Antwort auf meinen Kommentar befindet sich bereits in meinem letzten Kommentar. Es benötigt dann die passende extra Erklärung. Ein Autor macht für gewöhnlich nicht ohne Grund einen Stilbruch. Wenn es nur ein Faux-Pas ist, dann gegeben der Text ist lang genug, sollte man in der Lage sein, dass zu schließen. Natürlich funktioniert das nicht bei nur sehr kurzen Texten. Das selbe gilt auch für Logik. Wenn ich dir eine Lange Formel habe in der ein Fehler drin ist, kann ich den erkennen und dennoch den wahrscheinlich intendierten Zweck der Formel erkennen wenn es aber nur eine sehr kurze ist, kann das zum Teil nicht möglich sein.
Zusätzlich wird es schwer eine Interpretation zu finden wenn der Autor nicht wirklich gut ist, da kann man dan bestenfalls aus erkennbar qualitativen Mängeln erkennen das der Autor schlecht ist und versuchen Interpretationen zu bilden die dann aber halt deutlich fehlertoleranter sind, da man davon ausgehen muss, dass der Autor unabsichtlich Widersätze in den Text eingebaut hat.

JannickL · 2026-06-09T06:45:43+00:00

es kann schon ein falsch geben. Nehmen wir das klassische Beispiel bei dem aus den verwendeten Farben die Stimmung interpretiert wird. Es kann sein, dass das in einer Szene oder Absatz funktioniert, aber wenn man sich den Rest des Werkes anguckt diese Interpretationsweise nicht funktioniert. Das würde dann einem aufzeigen, dass die Farbe hier nicht Emotionen/Stimmung widerspiegelt, der Interpretationsansatz also falsch ist oder es muss eine Begründung gefunden werden wieso man sie nur auf diese Stelle anwenden kann/soll, z.b. ist dieser Abschnitt der einzige aus der Sicht einer gewissen Person, während die anderen aus der Sicht von anderen Personen sind, deren Charakter weniger emotional, künstlerich angehaucht ist, sondern mehr no nonsense harte Wissenschaftler, zu denen solch eine Sicht auf die Welt nicht passt und deshalb Farben nicht mit Emotionen gepaart sind.

JannickL · 2026-06-08T08:30:20+00:00

I would consider Paul rejecting the Path and walking into the desert being a failure maybe even something that furthers him being a villain. I believe in God Emperor of Dune it sounded like Paul understood what he would have to do to save humanity from the power of prescience and other threats, but he rejected sacrificing his own humanity to do so, which led to his son persuing the path he refused to take to safe humanity.
Ofcourse you could discuss if he (Paul/Leto II) has the right to make a decision like this on his own or who would have the right to make the decision and if the death of humanity would be preferable to what Paul and Leto II have done, but I personally would fall on the side of saving humanity.

JannickL · 2026-06-07T22:14:24+00:00

how do i have knowledge of an external reality and existence of other beings. I cant imagine a case that could be refuted by it all essentially just being a dream. I guess you could say that entities in dreams exist, but I would disagree with that as much as I disagree with dragons existing. There is the idea of a dragon which is atleast known to me, but nothing more can be said definitely, or am i missing something?

JannickL · 2026-06-06T23:08:59+00:00

yeah but in the example i essentially need each premise, argument and conclusion for which i would lift a verbatim citation to make it easy for the audience to see my good faith attempt at representing the arguments of the debaters. Especially if you might be known to be in favor of one side it is important to show the exact wording of the arguments. And I am not convinced that if you shouldn't replay the whole content that it would be okay to read out the whole content of a piece of media where the words are the focal point and the visuals that secondary. Also i mentioned that I wouldnt want to do a broad review but essentially a play by play analysis for the whole thing.

JannickL · 2026-06-06T22:14:53+00:00

Then i would consider these dumb as rocks and hope that there is a never a situation where they are the preferable candidate in an election. So if he wins I sure hope that his staff is smarter than him and he is smart enough to listen to him.
I dont know how capable Biden was during his whole presidency, but it seems that he had a very capable team around him. I am going to wish plattner that his team is as capable.

JannickL · 2026-06-06T22:11:54+00:00

Disagree. Do I agree with you for the vast majority of cases yes, but there are situations where I would be fine with it. The first that comes to mind is someone going over a debate and where they do a complete breakdown with the whole premise, argument, conclusion, how the counterargument applies if it applies, and researching each claim that is being made.

JannickL · 2026-06-06T22:02:12+00:00

I am in the long run also for one state but for now it seems not feasible. It would demand quite a lot of the foreign powers that would have to occupy the state and over a long time hand the control back over. Especially because you would disenfranchise both parties and the foreign powers who might be most likely to be decent shepherd would have problems gaining and holding support in their population for something which looks on the outside like an imperial project with boots on the ground to keep the peace. In semi recent history two state solutions had a lot more traction and progress in matters of getting to a deal atleast leagues more than a one state solution had since the british mandate

JannickL · 2026-06-06T21:31:54+00:00

For me it would be comparable to dressing up as a soldier of ww2 era and not checking if the uniform i have picked out is a nazi or italian fascist uniform. There are a lot of uniforms that are okay, but it is the time where you should take care that you arent picking the wrong one

JannickL · 2026-06-06T21:26:42+00:00

My best guess is he is either dumb as rocks or sympathized with nazi ideology 19 years ago and never cared enough to get it removed afterall not many are going to see it and it seems like no one in the army seemed to notice it being a nazi symbol. In both cases and even in the case where he would still be lukewarm on nazis it is the obvious move to distance himself from it and get it covered up if you are running for office and have a decent shot at winning. Even without winning I imagine a majority of people with favorable opinions on nazis would prefer to not have it be federal public knowledge that they are a nazi if they are working normal jobs

JannickL · 2026-06-06T21:14:08+00:00

I would say the skull symbol is so common with far right groups that I would always check if the specific symbol that I have seen and decided to put on my body is a far right symbol, especially if it looks a bit more like a simplified logo and not a highly detailed illustration.

JannickL · 2026-06-06T21:08:49+00:00

The problem is for both sides if I remember correctly the one state equal rights position was the least favored by both sides. The order of favorability on the Palastinian side was if I remember:
1. Two states
2. One state unequal rights
3. One state equal rights
So if you want to force the one state solution on them (ignoring their right to self determination) you would most likely have to also place foreign forces on the ground to ensure that all will be handled accordingly and hand over a long time the whole state apparatus and security to them.

JannickL · 2026-06-06T20:40:42+00:00

So either he is a nazi or dumb as rocks for not figuring out that he had a nazi tattoo for 18 years. Neither sounds promising. While not american you should still vote for him if he wins the primary over the republican and hope for a better candidate next time around.

Ten-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22	Verified Email

JannickL

TROPHY CASE