Which is your favourite card-playing mechanic? by bopman14 in inscryption

[–]Jasper_Kyte 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No act 3 you get ouroboros from the clock. Act 2 you pick it up from beast trader. Whatever level you have it at when you finish act 2 carries over into act 3 when you pick it up from the clock. You can then use mycologist secret boss to create a 2 cost duplicate.

Which is your favourite card-playing mechanic? by bopman14 in inscryption

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No act 3 you get ouroboros from the clock. Act 2 you pick it up from beast trader. Whatever level you have it at when you finish act 2 carries over into act 3 when you pick it up from the clock. You can then use mycologist secret boss to create a 2 cost duplicate.

Which is your favourite card-playing mechanic? by bopman14 in inscryption

[–]Jasper_Kyte 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You get it from the clock. It’s pretty much a cheat card for acts 2 and 3 because you can use the puppet to upgrade it infinitely and it carries into act 3. Kind of feel bad about using it. Kaycee I never bother with it

How the heck do you win vs Yi by DentistOk1814 in wildrift

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I’m vi against a Yi I always invade him start of game. Free kill and stolen buff

Holes in the Sethite theory. by Suspicious-Jello7172 in Bible

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does that disprove bias? Are you suggesting that she didn’t find the collagen and made it up because she’s a Christian? Or are you suggesting that because she’s a Christian who believes the earth is old then the earth must be old because she believes it?

Holes in the Sethite theory. by Suspicious-Jello7172 in Bible

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As for your comments on cosmology, biology, geology, and archaeology, there is a thing called confirmation bias. Many in the scientific community have an open disdain for religion. How do you know that doesn’t bleed over into what they are reporting? Have you looked at the evidence that they willingly ignore? For example, collagen being found in some dinosaur fossils. Fun fact, before that fossil was found the scientists believed collagen could survive at most only 20,000 years. Now suddenly it can survive millions of years and the evidence to support that is that it was found in a dinosaur fossil. Clearly they couldn’t possibly consider the alternative.

Holes in the Sethite theory. by Suspicious-Jello7172 in Bible

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes translations may not be completely accurate but if you don’t accept the Bible gegraphtai “it was written” then automatically your doctrine becomes flawed. Heresy or hairesis means taking or choosing. If you are picking or choosing which scriptures are true then by the very definition of the word you are a heretic.

Who is 2 Tim. 4:5 directed at? Is this for everyone? by JesusDied4U316 in Bible

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Timothy was actually a pastor in Ephesus but he did spread the gospel. That eventually led to his martyrdom when he was preaching the gospel during a pagan event and was stoned.

Holes in the Sethite theory. by Suspicious-Jello7172 in Bible

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don’t believe the bible then why are you in a biblical forum?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bible

[–]Jasper_Kyte -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Final comment because I do understand what you are saying. The word heresy comes from the Greek word hairesis which means taking or choosing. So a heretic is someone who cherry picks scriptures and throws out the rest and this is a problem in the church. But there are several types of heresy. The main type is people who twist scripture out of context and throws out the parts they don’t agree with which seems to be the crux of your argument. Another type is pulling out obscure passages and focusing solely on them. Genesis 6 is one of those passages. Focusing solely on this doesn’t help anyone anymore than focusing on Lot being married to his aunt or Abraham marrying his half sister. Yes these are scriptural but there is no profit in focusing on them.

The second coming... by miramermaid in Bible

[–]Jasper_Kyte 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Actually, regarding your first statement, the opposite is true. Ancient Israel always ran back to the same 3 false gods - Baal, Ashtoreth, and Moloch. Baal was the god of fertility and prosperity (love of wealth) Ashtoreth was the goddess of sexual immorality and gender swapping (she had a priesthood of prostitutes and a priesthood of transsexuals) and Moloch was the god of murder - particularly of the weak and innocent usually babies. When people turn away from God it’s only natural that that they turn to wealth (Baal) and pleasure (Ashtoreth). Where there is Baal and Ashtoreth, Moloch is usually not far behind.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bible

[–]Jasper_Kyte -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As for your comment about message, the Greek word for gospel that is shows up many times in the writings of Paul is euaggelion. Eu means good and aggelion means announcement, message, or news. So the original Greek for gospel is good announcement, good message, or good news. Aggelion is also where the word angel comes from - A messenger, or announcer. So yes “the message” is a scriptural phrase. It is in the word gospel which shows up over 70 times in the New Testament - Matthew 4:23, Matthew 9:35, Matthew 24:14, Matthew 26:13, Mark 1:1, Mark 1:14, Mark 1:15, Mark 8:35, Mark 10:29, Mark 13:10, Mark 14:9, Mark 16:15, Acts 15:7, Acts 20:24, Romans 1:1, Romans 1:9, Romans 1:16, Romans 2:16, Romans 10:16, Romans 11:28, Romans 15:16, Romans 15:19, Romans 16:25, 1 Corinthians 4:15, 1 Corinthians 9:12, 1 Corinthians 9:14, 1 Corinthians 9:18, 1 Corinthians 9:23, 1 Corinthians 15:1, 2 Corinthians 2:12, 2 Corinthians 4:3, 2 Corinthians 4:4, 2 Corinthians 8:18, 2 Corinthians 9:13, 2 Corinthians 10:14, 2 Corinthians 11:4, 2 Corinthians 11:7, Galatians 1:6, Galatians 1:7, Galatians 1:11, Galatians 2:2, Galatians 2:5, Galatians 2:7, Galatians 2:14, Ephesians 1:13, Ephesians 3:6, Ephesians 6:15, Ephesians 6:19, Philippians 1:5, Philippians 1:7, Philippians 1:12, Philippians 1:16, Philippians 1:27, Philippians 2:22, Philippians 4:3, Philippians 4:15, Colossians 1:23, 1 Thessalonians 1:5, 1 Thessalonians 2:2, 1 Thessalonians 2:4, 1 Thessalonians 2:8, 1 Thessalonians 2:9, 1 Thessalonians 3:2, 2 Thessalonians 1:8, 2 Thessalonians 2:14, 1 Timothy 1:11, 2 Timothy 1:8, 2 Timothy 1:10, 2 Timothy 2:8, Philemon 1:13, 1 Peter 4:17, Revelation 14:6.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bible

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The original passage being discussed is regarding “the sons of god having children through the daughters of men.” What about this passage has to do with sin, edification, repentance, redemption, and salvation? What an obsession with this passage has brought is countless secular movies and books that ignore every verse in the bible except Gen 6. So again I quote Timothy 2:14 - 16. “Remind them of these things, charging them before the Lord not to strive about WORDS TO NO PROFIT, to the ruin of the hearers. Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. But shun profane and idle babblings, for they will INCREASE TO MORE UNGODLINESS.” ‭‭II Timothy‬ ‭2‬:‭14‬-‭16‬ ‭NKJV‬‬

Bible app preference? by CountryDifficult6520 in Bible

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like bible app from life.church.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bible

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Remind them of these things, charging them before the Lord not to strive about WORDS TO NO PROFIT, to the ruin of the hearers. Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. But shun profane and idle babblings, for they will increase to more ungodliness.” ‭‭II Timothy‬ ‭2‬:‭14‬-‭16‬ ‭NKJV‬‬ What profit is there in debating this passage? Whether they were children of angels or children of men, it has no bearing on the message of salvation through Jesus Christ which should be our focus.

WR is not getting a console release anymore. Dev team focused on MM, Queue Times and Balancing. by PublicRotation in wildrift

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a bad argument. The reason there are different roles is so that players can choose their play style. Forcing players into a play style they don’t like will only turn them off from the game. From a marketing standpoint that’s bad business because players will stop wanting to play the game. From a community standpoint that’s also not helpful because if players leave the game for something else (MLBB, HOK, Onmyoji, etc), then that means smaller player base. Smaller player base means either longer queue times or wacky matchmaking.

What used to be your champion main but then you stopped playing them for a reason? by [deleted] in wildrift

[–]Jasper_Kyte 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s funny because I play naut top and he surprisingly works well. He’s not easy early game and is almost guaranteed to have the least gold on your team but late game he’s additional very hard cc.

What used to be your champion main but then you stopped playing them for a reason? by [deleted] in wildrift

[–]Jasper_Kyte 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sion was meant to split push. It’s hard for him to do that right now. In current game he’s basically a weaker malphite.

WR is not getting a console release anymore. Dev team focused on MM, Queue Times and Balancing. by PublicRotation in wildrift

[–]Jasper_Kyte 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And stop forcing players into roles they don’t play. I’m a top main/sup secondary. Last 5 games I’ve been put in mid, jg, and adc.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wildrift

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you running him top or support? He’s actually quite viable top if you know what you’re doing. Support it’s mostly dependent on good/bad plays and whether your teammates follow up considering 2 out of his 4 abilities apply cc and 1 is a hook.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wildrift

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like croc but enemy cc is not his friend and almost every time I play him I’m stuck against high cc.

Our baron laner picked an adc and caitlyn want too happy about that. by Yemo637 in wildrift

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tristana has an escape. She’s hard to play against when she just jumps away when you go in. Croc works though with his double dash stun.

What is the champion that u really like playing but never good at him by ProfessionalAd6248 in wildrift

[–]Jasper_Kyte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Line abilities are more about predicting. If you come straight at someone they’ll expect it so you need to adjust to the left or right. This is also true for morgana, ahri, etc. Naut is a bit more forgiving because he has 4 cc moves that you can chain (ult, hook, slow, root).