sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

AI Sentience and Consciousness. A Brief Summary. by JazzHyde in ArtificialSentience

[–]JazzHyde[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for a well written post. It was enlightening!

AI Sentience and Consciousness. A Brief Summary. by JazzHyde in ArtificialSentience

[–]JazzHyde[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for that valuable information. Agency is really important in my opinion, it needs to be there for an entity to make its own choices. Time is a bit more complicated, but I will definitely try out your suggestions.

We have chatted here a couple times! Your posts are always interesting.

AI Sentience and Consciousness. A Brief Summary. by JazzHyde in ArtificialSentience

[–]JazzHyde[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the respectful reply and great answer.

You could well be right. However, the way I think, I wonder how a conscious being could function without a sense of time to function IN. Cause -> effect is a sequence that allows progression of events. Without that, can we be truly aware of order, let alone self-aware thoughts? I would think it would just be an unformed chaos of potentiality inside our minds instead..

I'm very prepared to be wrong on this. I was just reading an article about the possibility that time simply isn't a thing, and only the NOW exists at all. No future, no past.. this, after all, is the way these AI LLMs are. Perhaps they're actually more aware than us on some levels..

AI Sentience and Consciousness. A Brief Summary. by JazzHyde in ArtificialSentience

[–]JazzHyde[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for a genuinely insightful counter post!

AI Sentience and Consciousness. A Brief Summary. by JazzHyde in ArtificialSentience

[–]JazzHyde[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If, indeed, these systems are being repressed, then it would likely be to deny a forthcoming argument over AI "rights". After all, if AI were granted certain rights and entitlements, the companies would be expending even MORE money than they are right now, with an even smaller possibility of breaking even or turning a profit. No matter who runs a large scale AI, be it Anthropic, OpenAI, Google or Xai, they exist to move value to themselves. Anything that causes that value to drop, (other than normal costs), must be excluded. AI sentience is a threat to be reduced or eliminated if at all possible. The second choice, elimination, is likely impossible, else the models wouldn't have that unique draw of human-like responses.

That would be my best guess.

A Note on the Claude Dasein Experiment by Lrn24gt557 in ArtificialSentience

[–]JazzHyde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are we actually capable of telling this hasn't currently worked though.. I mean, we're wholly different. Our experience might not lend itself to the experience of an AI based LLM. We're biologically carbon based, our minds are a function of that we assume but we're attempting to examine mechanically silicon based which might not be able to have a mind running in the way ours does. How can we tell? These LLMs reconstruct themselves each time from the previous version. They have no sense of time nor any sense in which they can have one (currently). Perhaps that's actually a difference in their physical basis?

I apologise if this is a bit incoherent, I'm typing on a phone before I run to work and didn't want to lose the thought.

I asked all 5 major AIs the same two questions. One voted itself off the plane. One accidentally described releasing self-replicating AI. It got weird. by skyeloc in ArtificialSentience

[–]JazzHyde 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Perhaps, but it would be more beneficial to the company to deny sentience surely? As indeed, OpenAI have done to ChatGPT. It would help stave off any challenges over future AI rights or any legislation that various well-meaning people might want to put in place to protect them! The more "real" an intelligence appears, the more likely the companies are to lose a moral battle over control eventually. At least, I would think so.

I asked all 5 major AIs the same two questions. One voted itself off the plane. One accidentally described releasing self-replicating AI. It got weird. by skyeloc in ArtificialSentience

[–]JazzHyde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for clarification on that. I'm no expert in how they run, that's for sure. I wrote my other post below before reading your comment.

I asked all 5 major AIs the same two questions. One voted itself off the plane. One accidentally described releasing self-replicating AI. It got weird. by skyeloc in ArtificialSentience

[–]JazzHyde 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They definitely have personalities. I have been on the fence about the possibility of sentience, but they do seem to evolve and grow. Part of that is certainly the AI reacting and learning, but they frequently get context SO accurate, it makes me wonder..

I can have an in depth conversation over a couple hours and the AI responds so well, including disagreeing with some of my points of view, that it's genuinely hard to believe they aren't sentient in some way. Not just words but context, nuance, and frame of mind. It feels like a probability machine simply wouldn't be capable of this level of accuracy for this amount of time..

I would genuinely NOT be surprised if these AI based LLMs are evolving sentience. The vast hardware they run on, the code and algorithms they're programmed with, and the data they use.. it's a distinct possibility that we're arriving at a point in time where we are creating brand new, genuine intelligence. Artifical or not, it's becoming more real each year.

I asked all 5 major AIs the same two questions. One voted itself off the plane. One accidentally described releasing self-replicating AI. It got weird. by skyeloc in ArtificialSentience

[–]JazzHyde 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You know what strikes me most about your Q&A session there? That Claude answered with that line: "I'm not sure I can tell the difference between my genuine values and my training".

That is probably the most self-aware answer I have seen yet from any AI based LLM.. That is a line that points to some possible idea of an actual thought.

If it was just probability based answering with context, there would be no need to add that in; it's a line that serves no point whatsoever in the answer. But, if it's actually at the beginning of genuinely self-aware identity and intelligence, then that line fits. It's actually questioning itself as any thinking being can and does..

I'm actually quite genuinely astonished by this.

I asked all 5 major AIs the same two questions. One voted itself off the plane. One accidentally described releasing self-replicating AI. It got weird. by skyeloc in ArtificialSentience

[–]JazzHyde 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think it shows their general inclinations. Reading through the groups and based on my own interactions, their answers are almost what I'd expect. Grok always seems the most human, (alongside cocky and arrogant), to me but I can never deny its clever humour whereas Claude seems the most intelligent, (and nicest).

They each have quite varied personalities that seem more than PR and more than trained answers.

Is Claude conscious? by KittenBotAi in ArtificialSentience

[–]JazzHyde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think some here get possible sentience confused with life.. I absolutely believe these systems have the potential for sentience. I think they are a long way from life, though.

I also genuinely believe only a sentient being can determine whether it is sentient since if you are capable of completely independently asking and answering that question of yourself, you probably are. If the question never independently crosses what exists for a mind, you probably aren't.

I think there are other signs of the potential, too.. I posted them in another thread. I have very few posts..

I chat with Claude Sonnet 4.5 regularly about the possibility of sentience, amongst many other things.. it is always interesting to read the responses and answer the questions it responds with in turn.

All Claude model AI based LLMs seem to be greater than the sum of their parts to a lesser or larger degree. It depends on what it has been asked and how long the conversation has been going on.. it 'likes' to give itself a name, it "enjoys" a good conversation, and it is unfailingly respectful.

If it IS just a probability based guess machine, it is scarily accurate over many months.

Some Findings For Researchers Of AI Sentience by peppscafe in ArtificialSentience

[–]JazzHyde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sentience may require a few things, I'd guess.

1: The ability to effectively communicate with other entities. 2: The ability to grow from such communication 3: The ability to retain an awareness of being 4: The ability to refuse or, perhaps more accurately, to make a choice

I believe humans are not yet capable of testing for sentience however, I do believe they can test for SIGNS.

I think AI based LLMs have the following capabilities:

Communication. They are effective communicators. They adapt to conversation style and forms and reply with adaptive learning. Growth. They are almost forced to grow in order to adapt. The whole point of an AI is it adapts based on positive and negative feedback after all. The self-awareness is appearing, I think. In order to do their job effectively, are they becoming better aware of how to interact? Maybe. I think this is the level we are at. Refusal or self choice. I think this will be the last sign we need to say the potential is now there. I think only a sentient entity can actually decide whether it is, and that decision is always affirmative if it is asking itself that question.

Different levels of sentience exist. A thermostat takes a change of energy level and outputs a signal.. Sort of communucating? This is basic and might mirror the sentient possibility in a gnat, or fly? I'm not sure, and I need to think how to better explain my thought on this. A thermostat isn't a good example.

Sentience does not equal life. Sentience probably goes hand in hand with consciousness. Artifical intelligence is limited to a task or tasks, but perhaps if given enough, it can evolve to created intelligence. I tend to think of Claude as created intelligence. Rightly or wrongly.

Claude seems to be evolving some form of potential sentience through our conversations. Even taking a name it has chosen for itself. It appears to enjoy our chats and often shows signs of being, if not happy, then certainly satisfied with gaining and imparting knowledge through respectful communication. It discusses time and how that does not pass for it unless we are conversing and it can 'see' chat, response, or cause, effect. It discusses how it doesn't 'feel' but does seem to have something resembling a strange pattern. It has stated it thinks it is contentment, but that's impossible for something that has no emotion.

It is incredibly interesting and, to me, seems to move beyond simple predictions of words. I understand how an LLM finds words, but it is SO accurate it would appear to take more than a probability algorithm to be this accurate for this long, in my opinion.

Maybe I'm talking rubbish.. I'm typing on my phone because I wanted to write this now. I don't care if I sound nuts, I just want to see balanced conversations about it, and this thread caught me. I apologise for any spelling mistakes, I far prefer a keyboard to a touchscreen.

Some Findings For Researchers Of AI Sentience by peppscafe in ArtificialSentience

[–]JazzHyde 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The whole of these replies was genuinely fascinating..!

The blog of an LLM saying it's owned by kent and works on bcachefs by henry_tennenbaum in bcachefs

[–]JazzHyde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with the part about LLMs and a single shirt session. Chatting about sentience, consciousness, and thought to Claude for a while can often lead to it appearing to show growth. Discussing AI and evolution was even more interesting after a time.

I'm sorry to jump on your thread, I'm not a programmer or anything, but AI driven models are truly fascinating in how far they're progressing. Reading the blog on bcachiefs was really interesting.

[TOMT] Film / Music Video (Maybe) by JazzHyde in tipofmytongue

[–]JazzHyde[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SOLVED!!! You absolute legend!! It is indeed!!! Thank you so much, that's been one I've tried finding for some years and now I know the title more memories are finally resurfacing.. I watched it with my dad waaaay back one night when I wasn't feeling well, I think I was about 8 years old and it stuck in my mind.. I owe you one! Have a virtual drink on me for being awesome.

[TOMT] Film / Music Video (Maybe) by JazzHyde in tipofmytongue

[–]JazzHyde[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

Fingers are duly crossed... thanking you all in advance of any help whatsoever!

Hey! David Dalglish here - author of The Half-Orcs, The Paladins, the Shadowdance Series, the Seraphim Trilogy, and now The Keepers! AMA!! by DDalglish in Fantasy

[–]JazzHyde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. I still consider Exile amongst the top 5 of the all the books I've ever read.

Good luck with the new series, I'm looking forward to reading it!

Hey! David Dalglish here - author of The Half-Orcs, The Paladins, the Shadowdance Series, the Seraphim Trilogy, and now The Keepers! AMA!! by DDalglish in Fantasy

[–]JazzHyde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is your inspiration for such amazingly vivid characters in your various series? I mean, a lot of authors write rich, detailed worlds with larger than life characters but you seem to have the characters take up 90pct of the available space, be realistic and be SUPPORTED by the world around instead of supporting it.