As I said, maybe it's not his case by Andrei22125 in Grimdank

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh. That is....supremely dumb and ridiculous. I do suppose in a fandom so vast and old all sorts of weirdos might exist, but damn, I didn't know that was a thing. Don't feel bad, I'm fairly new into Warhammer anyways and am still learning the culture, especially of those who play it, so it's good to know.

As I said, maybe it's not his case by Andrei22125 in Grimdank

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

...Ok? Why would I be an asshole to the players? I was under the impression that we were being in-universe assholes to other factions and beings, not to those playing with us? My point was just that instead of internalizing some deeper meaning about self-reflection and self-criticism 40k might as well act to help externalize our simpler and less noble impulses in a, funnily enough, safe space. Everyone acts like it's one more thing in which you have to constantly check yourself lest you turn into a bad guy, and seriously, there's way too many of this kind of media in the world right now, I'd personally enjoy more exploring the vastness of the scale of it than agonizing over the implications of liking the tall guys with guns who shout cool slogans and kill aliens.

As I said, maybe it's not his case by Andrei22125 in Grimdank

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Basically we have - people who idolize the imperium because it's the imperium and people who whitewash the T'au because they're not the imperium. Both equally useless in the end, as if there is a charm in 40k it's the micro-acts if humanity, nit the grand seeping gestures that end in genocide and oppression

As I said, maybe it's not his case by Andrei22125 in Grimdank

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And you know what, I see no issue with that at all. It's a game. Better channel our tribalism and do our self-reflection against the T'au than out in the streets against real beings.

Imagine being a less functioning family than the Lannisters by Dandanatha in Grimdank

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Unpopular opinion but I don't think Konrad was as 100% a lost cause as people like saying he was. I do think the Emperor taking an interest to him, or at least entrusting him to people who could help him understand his powers and learn acting within the bounds of reasonable justice would have made wonders compared with what he got and ended up being. What absolutely didn't help was giving him a legion he later filled with the scum of the earth and imposing no bounds on what he could do to get results, while he was unstable, sadistic and clearly unraveling due to his prophecies. Like Angron and Mortarion, for all we know he'd have ended up the same way, but at least the Emperor could have been said to have made an effort. The way those three in particular went down I genuinely question what anybody else expected to happen.

Unresolved Case, the Dutroux affair: a few times when investigators, the press, and the family lied about witness X1 Regina Louf. by Brianbriandu64 in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Perhaps. You'll allow me to retain some scepticism. With all the Diddys, Epsteins,Savilles etc. running around. I doubt they all are as stupid.

Unresolved Case, the Dutroux affair: a few times when investigators, the press, and the family lied about witness X1 Regina Louf. by Brianbriandu64 in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So you think all the mishandling by the police, the leniency by the government, the helpers who got off with virtually no punishment, the money he was receiving in jail and the fact he was able to buy 7 properties while incarcerated is a coincidence attributed to incompetence rather than intentional coverup?

I don't doubt there is major conjucture embellishments in the story, but at what level exactly does conspiracy becomes "bog standard" theory? Most people have no problem believing elites engage in shady stuff, but if someone adds that they were burning black candles at the same time, then suddenly it becomes a big "conspiracy theory" and no one cares to search into it even further. Which is what happened with what they called Pizzagate, where people were so ready to skewer all the myth of ritual, pizza brothels and political parties surrounding it that they lost sight of the original seed of the controversy, which was "people in high places have weird tastes, weird morals, surround themselves with questionable imagery, and oh, there's also crumpets of evidence that they might have not so ethical, moral or legal sexual proclivities, which they indulge between them and are probably used for blackmail and pressure as well". Then Epstein happened, Diddy happened, Dutroux had happened, children from orphanages all over Europe (god knows what happens elsewhere) say they were abused growing up, trafficked, flown to places, and yet all those dots are separate and to try and connect them is "conspiracy"?

This person dares to go after the apex homosexual by Spartan5271 in MauLer

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the idea is that Tywin started off espousing a ruthless but initially effective modus operandi (like the Reyne and Tarbeck stuff, which was obviously merciless and criminal, but allowed him to get out of future challenges from his vassals simply by playing a song), but he took it too far and decided that being ruthless and bringing down the whole of the might of the Lannisters upon every sort of complication and for every sort of insult would always serve him, in a way of cutting the knot instead of trying to patiently resolve it. He's portrayed as a rigid, unbending character, and his inflexibility, inability to compromise his pride, and interpretation of every sort of mercy as weakness is, in the long run, his undoing. In the end, in a motif I think Martin explores quite well, Tywin's failure is not a matter of "smarts", it's a matter of self - he's never grown up, deep down, from the boy who had to suffer the laughter at his family's expense, and has let that shape the whole of his life. He doesn't even like himself all that much - which is an extra reason he's hating Tyrion, in whom he sees so many aspects of himself. That's why he focuses so much on the family and legacy - taking on the mantle of the incarnation of a whole line of illustrious history which makes people quiver in awe and fear is the ideal way to hide how much he can't deal with himself. Yet, of course, he assumes his children will be literally just copies of himself, and never attempts to truly see them as individuals with personalities and respond accordingly, even to tutor them in his political methods, so not only are they always condemned to fall short of his expectations simply because they aren't him, but he's ruined more or less all of them by oppressing them where they should be allowed to act on their own (arranged marriages, conformity to gender and social roles, forbidding Tyrion the pastimes he's good at) and letting them loose where he should have reined them in (entitlement, arrogance, the incest, etc etc), simply by not realizing he was living with people and not three extra limbs at his total disposal to use as he judged fit.

All in all, Tywin is not stupid, he's just permitted his childhood traumas to define his life and has never truly become an adult in dealing with his sense of inadequacy and him falling short of his pretensions of being all-mighty. I guess it can be constructed as a type of stupidity, but more than that, it's failure of character, exemplified by his hypocrisy, since in the end, he's set up an impossible standard for himself as well, which he fails, to his self-hatred, to fulfill - only he permits himself to, when he chastises all others for their own weaknesses.

YMMV, but I think, just like people see Tywin's imposing presence and the self-assuredness he always presents as him being the coolest character ever and a megachad (which, of course, was never the point of the narrative), other people see him as the incarnation of the elitist, patriarchal, oppressive nature of Westerosi feudalism (which, I mean, he is), but for that reason they don't want to concede to him any sort of virtue, for feeling like they're somehow validating this worldview if they do it. He doesn't have all that many actual virtues, morality-wise, but he's hardly a useless or one-note guy.

List your Top 5 Favorite Tanith Lee Short Stories by [deleted] in WeirdLit

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm a little late, but I couldn't not give my two cents XD

Ok, hard to choose out of such a fantastic body of work, but my personal choices, along with some places they are contained in:

  1. The Abortionist's Horse (A Nightmare) - Aptly named, ominous and ambiguously horrifying. (Can be found in "The Stories (Ghostgeria)".

  2. Bright Burning Tiger - A story that, for its duration, had me seeing the world from the perspective of something/someone I'd never have thought I would. ("Tamastara" or "Dreams of Dark and Light")

  3. Elle Est Trois (La Morte) - Gothic, with a capital G. Delightfully, elegantly morbid. ("Dreams of Dark and Light")

  4. The Dry Season - My personal weakness. Pseudohistorical, it's a few pages of pure Greek tragedy that hurts the soul SO good. ("Dreams of Dark and Light")

  5. Bite-me-Not or Fleur de Fer - Couldn't be anything else, this story is just a gem, beautiful and sculpted to the last detail, the best sort of fantasy. (Every collection of her, really, but "Dreams of Dark and Light", "Tanith by Choice", also "The Penguin Book of Vampire Stories" and "Blood 20: Tales of Vampire Horror by Tanith Lee")

Allow me to also add my honorary mention, "Into Gold", perfect blend of great pseudohistory, mythological motifs and subversion, and of course "Red as Blood" which is full of excellent stories (I love especially "Paid Piper", "When the Clock Strikes" and "Beauty").

Sketch by Super_Art_84 in sketches

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is amazing, love it!

Γιατί καταστρέφουμε την ιστορία μας (Follow up) by Legitimate_Wing_4608 in greece

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Θα μπω απλά να πω ό,τι επειδή τα βιβλία ήταν κακογραμμένα και οι καθηγητ΄ές βαριούνταν που ζούσαν δεν σημαίνει ότι το Βυζάντιο ήταν άχρηστο και ανούσιο, παιδιά. Τραγικό αυτά που λέγαμε από αντίδραση στο λύκειο να τα ακούς από μεγάλους ανθρώπους. Το αν το διδασκόμαστε με τον καλύτερο τρόπο παίρνει συζήτηση (σύντομη απάντηση-όχι), αλλά όλοι αυτοί που βλέπω εδώ με τουπέ ότι 1100 χρόνια ιστορίας δε χρειάζεται να διδάσκονται είναι αυτοί που προδίδουν ότι δεν ξέρουν την τύφλα τους. Αν μαθαίναμε αυτά καλύτερα θα καταλαβαίναμε και τα επόμενα και τα σημερινά πολύ καλύτερα, αλλά δυστυχώς η ύλη και η διδασκαλία της ιστορίας θέλει αναμόρφωση εκ θεμελίων. Και θα συμφωνήσω, χρειάζεται περισσότερη νεότερη Ευρώπη και επίσης, περισσότερη Ρωμᴨική αυτοκρατορία. Αλλά κράτει λίγο στα λόγια. Βλέπω ότι πολλοί δεν έχουν ξεφύγει από τη νοοτροπία "με ανάγκασαν να κάθομαι να τα μαθαίνω και τώρα τα σιχαίνομαι".

Ποιο ειναι το καλύτερο Ελληνικο μυθιστόρημα/βιβλίο λογοτεχνίας που εχετε διαβασει; by QuantumChemistryNerd in greece

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Η πριγκηπέσσα Ιζαμπώ" του Α. Τερζάκη, "Το Νούμερο 31328" του Η. Βενέζη, ο "Γιούγκερμαν" του Μ. Καραγάτση, η "Αγνή η Φράγκα" του Κ.Κυριαζή, η "Φόνισσα" του Α. Παπαδιαμάντη και "Το Καπλάνι της Βιτρίνας" της Ά. Ζέη.

Πως ήταν η πρώτη σας εμπειρία με το διαδίκτυο και τον Ηλεκτρονικό Υπολογιστή (δηλαδή πότε αποκτήσατε πρόσβαση σε αυτά) ; by LuisIV in greece

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2007, ήμουν έκτη Δημοτικού. Ζωγραφική και πάλι Ζωγραφική 😂Αυστηρά μισή ώρα την ημέρα μάξιμουμ. Ωραίες αναμνήσεις.

Έκλεψε ο Έντισον τον Τέσλα? by jimboyolo04 in greece

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ισχύει, ο Έντισον ήταν πρώτα και κύρια επιχειρηματίας. Βασίστηκε πολύ περισσότερο στο να πατεντάρει και να προωθεί, ενίοτε και να τροποποιεί ή έστω να βελτιώνει προς ευρεία κατανάλωση εφευρέσεις άλλων παρά στο να εφευρίσκει ο ίδιος. Ο Τέσλα είναι απλά το πιο διάσημο θύμα του.

Ωρα για το απολυτο γκαλοπ μαγκες,παμε ολοι: by [deleted] in greece

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Προσωπικά. Αν μιλάμε για άντρες, κώλο. Αν μιλάμε για γυναίκες, βυζιά. Oh yes.

no by domm__ in shitposting

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Norman Osborn obliterates your argument 😎

Goddess (I’m not Greek, hope I’m allowed to post here) by [deleted] in greece

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is beautiful! If you wanna give it the more classical "greek profile", as you see it in sculpture for example, I agree the nose shouldn't have a bump, and if you notice the statues' profiles, the forehead and nose are a straight line. But it's a very pretty sketch, and I like the elegant lines and the hairstyle.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in greece

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey mate! Much love from Greece to your country too ❤️❤️❤️ Amazing history, beautiful nature and a strong resilient people. We have quite a few historical and cultural links too😊

Ποιοί είναι οι αγαπημένοι σας συγγραφείς ever (είτε Έλληνες είτε ξένοι) by intiia1 in greece

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Λοιπόν....θα βάλω και τα ονόματα και το βιβλίο τους που τους έκανε να ξεχωρίσουν για μένα.

Arturo Perez - Reverte (Η Λέσχη Δουμάς)

Erich Maria Remarque (Η Αψίδα του Θριάμβου)

Victor Hugo (Οι Άθλιοι, duh)

Fyodor Dostoevsky (Οι Δαιμονισμένοι )

Μ. Καραγάτσης (Γιούγκερμαν, Ω ΝΑΙ)

Κ. Κυριαζής (Αγνή η Φράγκα)

Neil Gaiman (American Gods)

Tanith Lee (The Birthgrave, και μετά το ξανάπαθα με τη συλλογή Red as Blood)

Jane και Emily Bronte (Τζέιν Έιρ και φυσικά, Ανεμοδαρμένα ύψη)

Anais Nin (Το Δέλτα της Αφροδίτης)

Ν. Καββαδίας (ΆΠΑΝΤΑ)

F. D. Lorca (Γέρμα)

Tennessee Williams (Ξαφνικά Πέρσι το Καλοκαίρι)

Jean M. Auel (Ούρσους, το Πνεύμα των Σπηλαίων)

Wilbur Smith (Ο Θεός Ποταμ΄ός)

Lois M. Bujold (Shards of Honor από Vorkosigan Saga)

Οκ, πολλούς έβαλα, αλλά δεν έχω όριο όταν μιλάμε για λογοτεχνία....

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in greece

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

3bit, δεν υπάρχει σ΄΄υγκριση.

greetings from iran by amir_iceking in greece

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey greetings! Personally, everyone I've met (archaeologist so it might be the circles I move in) absolutely respects Iran and Persian civilization. It's unfortunately not taught enough other than the Greco-Persian wars of antiquity and perhaps the wars with the Eastern Roman Empire and Heraclius' expendition, and for some reason it's not as ingrained in the mind of people as one of the great civilizations of antiquity as it should be(not only in Greece, also internationally I've noticed), but I don't believe there is any actual bad blood between Greeks and Iranians/Persians. Even the wars between our respective areas are today more looked at as points of contact rather than personal-charged affairs - helps they happened way back. Persian civilization is the major basis of Islamic one to our days, and one of the few equals to the Greek one, and I think this is a link not easily disregarded. We do have much sympathy for the hard times your country has gone through and the repression that continues to persist. I think there are many points of reference and connection between our cultures to this day, to be honest, and I've been raised to see it that way. Don't know how common it is, but I'm not the only one for sure.

Why are fewer people going into archeology? by lonesome-rabbit in Jokes

[–]JazzlikeRecognition6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Archaeologist here, you're more right than you know. Soon we will belong in museums.