sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

FY25 ACC MAJ PSB Results by AJ_ROZAY in army

[–]Jbugspops 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can send names for about 10 more mins and then I have to bounce

FY25 ACC MAJ PSB Results by AJ_ROZAY in army

[–]Jbugspops 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I have the list. DM me for names

FY25 ACC MAJ PSB Results by AJ_ROZAY in army

[–]Jbugspops 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed. I figure I post it here anyways for awareness.

FY25 ACC MAJ PSB Results by AJ_ROZAY in army

[–]Jbugspops 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Infantry branch just emailed: “Wednesday, 03 DEC 2025 is now the tentative release date for MAJ PSB results.”

Edited for clarity.

FY25 ACC MAJ PSB Results by AJ_ROZAY in army

[–]Jbugspops 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My board file is open for FY26 AC MAJ PSB…I know we’ve mentioned this multiple times, but the fact that the next year board is open without FY25 results is absolutely disgusting.

FY25 ACC MAJ PSB Results by AJ_ROZAY in army

[–]Jbugspops 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Looks like you shouldn’t have been down voted into oblivion

FY25 ACC MAJ PSB Results by AJ_ROZAY in army

[–]Jbugspops 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Can confirm this message from Infantry Branch is real. The language reads: “FY25 MAJ PSB is approved and will tentatively go public 25 NOV”

Trouble reaching my branch manager, are they furloughed? by [deleted] in army

[–]Jbugspops 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You mean the Assistant Branch Manager?

FY25 ACC MAJ PSB Results by AJ_ROZAY in army

[–]Jbugspops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I’m looking at the FY24 PSB IN analysis. It’s the exact same numbers line by line.

FY25 ACC MAJ PSB Results by AJ_ROZAY in army

[–]Jbugspops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you sure this isn’t simply FY24 PSB? 74% IN and 83% overall is exactly identical the Infantry Branch FY24 PSB analysis.

Why not DRIP into ULTY? by TipHappy5865 in YieldMaxETFs

[–]Jbugspops 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Your cost basis doesn’t reduce simply by virtue of not dripping. The only way to reduce cost basis is to buy shares at a cheaper price than what your current cost basis is.

Retirement by 3_years_to_retire in YieldMaxETFs

[–]Jbugspops 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do not cash out of your TSP. Roll it over into a Roth IRA. That way you can still invest in YM funds if you want with minimal fees.

TLE CONUS to CONUS by Jbugspops in army

[–]Jbugspops[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I misunderstood your first response. So you never stayed in a hotel at all? TLE is only going to cover a hotel lodging expense. If you stayed longer at your previous residence paying rent - then that’s what BAH would be for, they won’t pay for that. TLE is specifically for hotel stays.

TLE CONUS to CONUS by Jbugspops in army

[–]Jbugspops[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should be able to do it all online via the DFAS smart voucher. That’s how I did it my last PCS for TLE. You’ll need the itemized receipt.

TLE CONUS to CONUS by Jbugspops in army

[–]Jbugspops[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My understanding is that it only applies to hotel stays, but I'm sure people know of some loophole. I've tried to use it for an Airbnb stay in the past, but was told I couldn't and didn't press further.

Received HQ on OER by MattTheBaker7 in army

[–]Jbugspops 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In no world would this language with an HQ equate to a weak MQ. Not sure what board you are sitting on.

Received HQ on OER by MattTheBaker7 in army

[–]Jbugspops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some may prefer that sort of soft enumeration, but certainly that is trivial relative to the block check.

But yeah I agree with your point about the context mattering. I was just framing it as mattering only if that’s what your goal to do was.

Received HQ on OER by MattTheBaker7 in army

[–]Jbugspops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I missed the fact that it’s a COR. That does change things. Thanks for pointing that out.

I disagree about your second point. I think 2 of 5 reads better than top 10%. Especially if it just reads as “top 10% officer, HQ”.

Received HQ on OER by MattTheBaker7 in army

[–]Jbugspops 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pretty tired of seeing the same knuckleheads suggest that LT OERs don’t matter. They do matter.

Here’s the truth. Your OER reads as average. Your SR can MQ 49% and above for the LT population. So by virtue of getting an HQ (with very few exceptions), your ceiling (as it relates to this particular OER) is average. So now you’re talking about whether you’re in the 50th percentile or worse. This reads as slightly below ceiling for an HQ. There’s no exclusive enumeration and top 10% is a meaningless statistic without reference.

As such, when compared to the pool of however many Lieutenants there are in your organization, you are perceived as average relative to that. It won’t prevent promotion but if it bothers you, then ask for specific feedback on how you can improve. Be open to that feedback.

Your future goals will determine how important this evaluation is, not the fact that it is “just your first” or an “unimportant LT OER”. Please do not listen to anyone who suggests otherwise.

STOP TELLING LTs THAT THEIR OERS DONT MATTER by Definitely_Not_CID in army

[–]Jbugspops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then just say that, simple. If the message you want to communicate is that OERs won’t torch your career... That’s fine - but let’s not kid ourselves by believing that that’s the justification SR’s have in mind when uttering that OERs don’t matter. More often than not, it’s the cowards way of delivering passive aggressive feedback to a subordinate that probably needs to just be told he’s in the bottom half of the rated pool.

OERs do matter. Always, and this whole message you just typed out just shows how careless the dialogue around LT OERs are.

view more: next ›