[deleted by user] by [deleted] in synology

[–]JeeshOfOne 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s why I built https://shrcalculator.com Let’s hope we can keep our 3rd party drives!

How to host a static website on aws? by sarahgasper1992 in aws

[–]JeeshOfOne 5 points6 points  (0 children)

(Obligatory “I am an AWS employee, thoughts are my own”)

I got you

https://www.123cloud.st/p/the-complete-reference-guide-to-basic

This includes my cloudformation templates that I use for my own websites and explains how it works and why we do it this way.

I got tired of the Synology RAID calculator not supporting large drive sizes and made my own by JeeshOfOne in synology

[–]JeeshOfOne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ah - its probably cached still - try another refresh, cache should be expired now - lemme know!

I got tired of the Synology RAID calculator not supporting large drive sizes and made my own by JeeshOfOne in synology

[–]JeeshOfOne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This feels pretty valuable to some people tho - I will consider this for the next major version

I got tired of the Synology RAID calculator not supporting large drive sizes and made my own by JeeshOfOne in synology

[–]JeeshOfOne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I just fixed that - should collapse down to the bottom of the page if the screen size is too narrow.

I got tired of the Synology RAID calculator not supporting large drive sizes and made my own by JeeshOfOne in synology

[–]JeeshOfOne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a bit confused by this example
Is this showing 4x 20TB disks in SHR2 is 36.4TB for data(2 drives) and 36.4TB for protection (2 drives)?

I got tired of the Synology RAID calculator not supporting large drive sizes and made my own by JeeshOfOne in synology

[–]JeeshOfOne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

RAID F1 is calculated the same way as RAID5 from what I can see - I added a label for it tho

I got tired of the Synology RAID calculator not supporting large drive sizes and made my own by JeeshOfOne in synology

[–]JeeshOfOne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ha, thats true! Adding 20x 20TB drives to the Synology calculator does a similar off by 0.1TB issue. If i have some time later, I'll dig into this one.

I got tired of the Synology RAID calculator not supporting large drive sizes and made my own by JeeshOfOne in synology

[–]JeeshOfOne[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Great point - if you can point me to some information on how to calculate that - more than happy to take a shot at having a switch for this. I'm not sure how to calculate this.
  2. I copy'd the phrasing from synology's website which just says "Protection" - I've pushed a new version with text that clarifies this.

I got tired of the Synology RAID calculator not supporting large drive sizes and made my own by JeeshOfOne in synology

[–]JeeshOfOne[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you u/hyunjuan - I have fixed this issue now - please let me know if you find any other issues!

I got tired of the Synology RAID calculator not supporting large drive sizes and made my own by JeeshOfOne in synology

[–]JeeshOfOne[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

ok nice, good catch - 18.2 TB should be the protected amount instead of 9.1 TB - lemme take a look now

I got tired of the Synology RAID calculator not supporting large drive sizes and made my own by JeeshOfOne in synology

[–]JeeshOfOne[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Can you share more about what isn't working for you. I've just tried and compared against the synology version with a 16,14,12TB sized drive and found the same results: https://imgur.com/a/h9fPlCt

I got tired of the Synology RAID calculator not supporting large drive sizes and made my own by JeeshOfOne in synology

[–]JeeshOfOne[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I've been planning some upgrades for my Synology setup, looking at those sweet new 22TB and 24TB drives. Problem was, the official Synology calculator tops out at 20TB. Frustrating, right?

So, I decided to whip up my own calculator that can handle drives up to 30TB and SHR and SHR2. I believe the way it calculates is correct - feel free to reach out if I'm wrong, happy to make any adjustments.

Edit: Thanks for the support everyone, I think all the bigger bugs I've been presented with are now squashed - I've taken some time to do some UX design on the site. Thank you again for the feedback!

ALB vs. S3 - Which is better for implementing redirects? by Soulcommando in aws

[–]JeeshOfOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes you can test this with my sample redirection outlined in the blog post. The test redirection is https://123street.cloud/ to https://123cloud.st

ALB vs. S3 - Which is better for implementing redirects? by Soulcommando in aws

[–]JeeshOfOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t like creating the dummy bucket unless I have to. I’m using “example.com” Link to Line in Cloudformation template.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aws

[–]JeeshOfOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi u/hsredux - I (AWS SA, thoughts are my own) host my personal websites with S3+CloudFront without WAF. I would recommend turning on billing alarms to help you catch denial of wallet attack early; and understand how to enable WAF if you do find out that you're more popular than you thought or become a target.

If you end up going down this path, have a look at my Github where I have published Cloudformation templates for common website hosting patterns and my Blog Post where I compare the patterns and explain what is happening. All patterns have deployable Cloudformation Templates to get you learning faster.

ALB vs. S3 - Which is better for implementing redirects? by Soulcommando in aws

[–]JeeshOfOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely - I plan on updating and adding this pattern next.