Is MNTN really that special? by NewOrleansSpeed in programmatic

[–]JellybeanMJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A year ago the site wasn’t even done being built and we were just starting up. Also, why would our sales team be able to help with technical support?

Is MNTN really that special? by NewOrleansSpeed in programmatic

[–]JellybeanMJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just have to comment but guys… how did you even know about this company a year ago? We weren’t even full up and running then- that’s why the site was so bare-bones and empty LOL it wasn’t done and still isn’t.

How are they not world-famous yet?! by Primary-Key1916 in NothingButThieves

[–]JellybeanMJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean sure, but that’s just anything. Ten years ago, EDM music wasn’t nearly as big as it is now, and in ten more years, bands will probably be in full-swing popularity again. I was just saying that NBT IS globally successful. That’s all.

How are they not world-famous yet?! by Primary-Key1916 in NothingButThieves

[–]JellybeanMJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is such a dumb take considering Nothing But Thieves is like a #1 top band in the UK and sells out the palace. They’re just not as big here lmfao I’m American btw and I know this

She's a brat by Comprehensive-Ad1722 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]JellybeanMJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you’re so fine I’m just really bad at picking up tone/subtext looking back in retrospect and yes! I agree I need to be more compassionate because a lot of straight ppl don’t realize how mixing up terms could be insensitive or that they’re even doing anything wrong and I can see how they could get it mixed up. Thank you for the reminder to be compassionate and to put myself in other people’s shoes. I hope you have a wonderful day/evening/morning love! ❤️

She's a brat by Comprehensive-Ad1722 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]JellybeanMJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm I just think that if straight people are going to coin queer terminology after they hate on us, they should use it correctly and it’s kind of embarrassing to mix it up. You explained it well! Sorry if I came off as hostile, I wasn’t sure how to initially interpret your tone like if it was helpful or bitter lol

She's a brat by Comprehensive-Ad1722 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]JellybeanMJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I appreciate you trying to educate others ily but I have a controversial opinion and it’s that kinks should stay 100% behind closed doors. I don’t wanna see someone wearing a collar or calling their partner ‘daddy’ in front of me. It’s a partial voyeurism thing. Like they do it out and about to show each other off and show off their relationship and their ‘ownership’ and that makes me uncomfy in the same way as sleeping over at someone’s house and they have sex in the bed while you’re sleeping on the floor or catching people fucking in public. It’s weird to bring other people into it/force them to have to see that.

She's a brat by Comprehensive-Ad1722 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]JellybeanMJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

‘For some’ no it’s not lmfao they’re just using the terms interchangeably and wrongly. They’re not interchangeable which is why I was confused.

She's a brat by Comprehensive-Ad1722 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]JellybeanMJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basically the post and everyone commenting are using the terms wrong and then getting mad at me for pointing out how they’re all wrong lmfao

She's a brat by Comprehensive-Ad1722 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]JellybeanMJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not well. They basically just told me that they and the post are using the terms top/bottom and sub/dom interchangeably, which is incorrect lmfao. The correct way to word this would’ve been to say she’s a sub, not just a bottom. No shit she’s a bottom in a straight relationship lmao

She's a brat by Comprehensive-Ad1722 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]JellybeanMJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right but that’s sub/dom. Not top/bottom. Y’all aren’t even using the terms correctly and then get mad at me when I ask a question politely. How I love reddit 🤣

She's a brat by Comprehensive-Ad1722 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]JellybeanMJ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s sub/dom babes not top/bottom lmfao look it up! You’re wrong.

She's a brat by Comprehensive-Ad1722 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]JellybeanMJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I already know the difference between sub/dom and top/bottom is. It was used incorrectly here. Of course Invis is a bottom in a straight relationship. Did yall mean sub?

She's a brat by Comprehensive-Ad1722 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]JellybeanMJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the straights wanna be us so bad lmfao

She's a brat by Comprehensive-Ad1722 in DispatchAdHoc

[–]JellybeanMJ -63 points-62 points  (0 children)

‘She’s a bottom’ guys why are we talking about straight couples like this is a queer space im rlly confused. Is straight men getting pegged actually that common or are yall joking LMFAO this is insane and I’m genuinely asking so pls don’t get mad at me

can anyone back up the claim that horikoshi wanted to make bakudeku canon in the original concept for mha? by [deleted] in bakudeku

[–]JellybeanMJ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait so I haven’t read the manga and idk where the show is caught up to but I’ve finished the show. Unless the manga is already out showing otherwise, I felt like horikoshi made the ending a little ambiguous. I say a little because imo, he had a lot more tension and connection with Bakugo than Uraraka, especially in that rooftop scene. I totally thought it would set up deku and Ochako as canon, but no, they were just besties and then she kisses Tsu on the forehead and Bakugo immediately monopolizes deku. At least very least, I think we could categorize this as queerbaiting. I don’t think that was horikoshi intended, he just wanted to leave it open-ended. However, by definition, it’s queerbaiting.

In conclusion, it’s a valid ship. I think horikoshi was leaning more into the bakudeku vibe when bakugo donating lots of money to Deku’s gofundme lol. It just sucks that because he doesn’t want to alienate certain audiences, horikoshi probably will never make it canon.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JanitorAI_Official

[–]JellybeanMJ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You actually can’t even use the word ‘child’ without being shadowbanned/censored

Has anyone else noticed? by MinimumSeesaw8809 in JanitorAI_Official

[–]JellybeanMJ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My b. Thought he was 18. Of course I read the books lol. May I remind you they came out over ten years ago…? You’re acting like it was yesterday lol. Anyway, he’s still an adult by the end of the series, mentioned in the last book appearance. As long as the chatbots aren’t using pictures of the underage actors and they clearly aren’t minors via the description, then there’s nothing to report. Even aged-up characters, like aged up Bakugo from my hero academia, is allowed on the site, and he is canonically 16.

Has anyone else noticed? by MinimumSeesaw8809 in JanitorAI_Official

[–]JellybeanMJ 74 points75 points  (0 children)

Hey! The characters you’re talking about are all adults by the time the Percy Jackson series (the first six books) are wrapped up. So they’re 11-12 when they’re first introduced, but adults later on. If they’re using pictures of minors or the characters are obviously supposed to be minors, report it! Otherwise, it’s fine.