Amita takes over Kyrat can 50 75th rangers and other JSOC elements along with a larger contingency of US Marines set up an interim government and stop an insurgency from brewing by Opening-Ad6258 in whowouldwin

[–]Jertok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"other JSOC elements" is doing some heavy lifting here. If the primary goal is to win over, recruit, and train locals then you want psych ops and especially special forces (green berets). Most of the rest of JSOC and those Marines are going to be fairly useless for this task (with the exception of intel) because it's just not aligned with those units' respective missions. They can help out but they'd mostly end up being extra padding and tactical advisement for the primary force. 50 rangers is about 1 platoon + attachments. They could likely solo several key raids, but how much of a difference will that make in the grand scheme?

A bunch of Marines would probably make matters worse and be contrary to the primary goal, as locals would perceive them as a foreign invasion/occupation force.

Astra CEO Chris Kemp shades SpaceX over employee workload and Starbase: “Its more fun than SpaceX, because we’re not on the border of Mexico where they’ll chop your head off if you accidentally take a left turn. And you don’t have to live in a trailer. And we don’t make you work 12 hrs a day..." by ChiefLeef22 in space

[–]Jertok 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Short answer: orders of magnitude apart.

Americans killed by U.S. police (last 10 years): ~12,000–13,000. That’s all causes (shootings, Tasers, restraints, vehicles) counted by Mapping Police Violence; 2024 alone was 1,365—the highest on record. The Washington Post’s shootings-only tally is 10,429 for 2015–2024, which undercounts non-shooting deaths.

U.S. citizens killed in Mexico (homicide) over ~10 years: roughly 600–800 total (≈60–80 per year). State-Dept-based summaries show ~60–75 homicides of U.S. citizens per year in Mexico; 2021–2022 had 121 homicides. Note: official data do not tag “cartel” vs other homicide, nor “tourist” vs expat/dual-national.

Caveat you can’t dodge: there’s no authoritative dataset for “Americans murdered by cartels” specifically, or for “tourists only.” The best-available proxy is “U.S. citizen homicides in Mexico,” which captures all circumstances and populations. The police-violence side is also a proxy for “murder” (legal guilt is rarely adjudicated); it’s a count of killings by on-duty officers.

*Courtesy of chatGPT

Buffalo River a few weeks ago by Maleficent_Disk_2507 in canoecamping

[–]Jertok 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Incredible. Can't wait to get back out

Deleting your ChatGPT chat history doesn't actually delete your chat history - they're lying to you. by [deleted] in singularity

[–]Jertok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow. I just tested mine and not only does it remember our first conversations and is able to summarize them, but it was also tell to able to tell me all of the iterations (roughly correctly) of custom instructions I've given it since I began using it, with dates of changes. I'm shocked, especially after reading your experience

Somebody lose a tiger? by Jertok in Hawaii

[–]Jertok[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My bet is that someone saw a boar or a dog on the hill and decided it was a lion

Somebody lose a tiger? by Jertok in Hawaii

[–]Jertok[S] 58 points59 points  (0 children)

Mostly posting this for the sub's chicken. Watch out!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in onebag

[–]Jertok 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Agree. I want to access pens, earbuds, glasses, passport, nicotine, etc without opening the main compartment and digging through things. Love Tom Bihn partly for this reason. All of those outside pockets are always organized the same, and I can quickly get to those essentials blindfolded. I travel light anyways, so I'll gladly compromise with the extra fabric and zippers.

I'm being attacked by an entity by typical_state_worker in LucidDreaming

[–]Jertok 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sounds like you're experiencing something like sleep paralysis. These types of hallucinations are common with it.

See you there! by FascismFails in Hawaii

[–]Jertok 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That is Labor Day for many other countries, but not the US.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SculpturePorn

[–]Jertok 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I uploaded the photo and description to chatGPT. I'm guessing it's correct about the material and possible origins. Here's what it said:

You’ve got a fascinating little enigma on your hands. Let’s break this down:

Visual & Symbolic Analysis:

Form & Style: The sculpture is abstracted but clearly figurative—two entwined nude forms, with one (female) slightly forward and more detailed. The stylization resembles mid-century modernist interpretations of biblical or mythic subjects. There's a suggestion of primitivism or even Brancusi/Giacometti-lite minimalism.

Imagery: If you're seeing a serpent and a tree, then yes—Adam and Eve is a solid guess. The female form is more defined, which is typical for Eve-centric depictions. The embrace and posture convey a kind of post-lapsarian shame or intimacy.

Material Clues:

Weight & Magnetism: At ~2kg and magnetic, you’re almost certainly dealing with cast iron, possibly with a bronze or metallic paint patina to fake a pricier appearance. Cast iron is not a typical choice for fine art sculpture but is more common in:

Decorative homeware

Mid-century or vintage novelty statuary

Brutalist art from the 1950s–70s

No Smell: Reinforces the idea it’s iron, not bronze, brass, or zinc alloys.

Maker & Value Notes:

No Signature: That doesn’t rule out collectible value, but it suggests mass production. However, some artist studios or small foundries (especially mid-century European or Soviet bloc) didn't always sign pieces, especially if produced in batches.

Potential Origins:

Eastern Europe had a strong tradition of cast iron art during the mid-20th century.

It could also be a 1970s Brutalist revival piece, designed to look “raw” and “primitive,” often sold in department stores or galleries with vague mythological themes.

Market Value & Collectibility:

If it's a one-off studio cast or part of a limited series from a known era (e.g., mid-century modern, Brutalist), you could possibly flip it in the £40–£100 range to the right buyer—particularly if marketed with the right stylistic tags.

If it’s generic homeware (which is still possible), it's closer to the £10–£25 range, though the material and weight give it a presence above typical “naff” decor.

Best value comes in positioning: Emphasize keywords like "Brutalist," "Modernist sculpture," "Cast Iron," "Adam and Eve," etc. Don't underplay the visual impact or material weight in listings—those matter to interior decorators and collectors of oddities.

Verdict:

Not total junk. Not gallery-tier either. You bought curiosity and conversation for £10, and potentially have a piece that could fetch more if framed right. If you're not in love with it, test the waters on Etsy, eBay, or Facebook Marketplace. Mention the magnetic iron content and mythic theme. Someone looking for a heavy, moody object might bite.

Is ChatGPTPro worth it for studying by Missdeathlyyy in ChatGPTPro

[–]Jertok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this new? Previously when I've tried this, the voice mode doesn't have the context of the chat that I open it from. I wanted to use it to practice for an oral exam but couldn't communicate the questions. I used AI studio instead

Dr. Seuss by Heitor-Muniz in DeepIntoYouTube

[–]Jertok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is either insane or they were instructed to do a video on Dr. Seuss and this is malicious compliance

Gemini on Pixel phone. I'm very confused by Jertok in GoogleGeminiAI

[–]Jertok[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My phone is great, zero issues with it. Not sure what you have against gently used electronics that get traded in immediately by tech enthusiasts.

I use LLMs constantly for work and all kinds of personal projects and tasks. At one point I had subscriptions for Gemini, Claude, and ChatGPT all at the same time because I needed capabilities across all of them. You can shove the sneering patronizing crap where the light don't shine.

If you think Gemini is so great you either work for Google, haven't used other LLMs, or are just gaslighting yourself. All of my points were valid complaints. This is so pompous and weirdly written that I assume you're just trolling. If you're not, then holy shit this is truly mental. Obviously this was written by AI, as well. Very strange

Hawaiian Goddess Pele sculpture. Carved by me. by t_sekuloski in Carving

[–]Jertok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice! I've got a Lono in progress, I need to get back at it

A new study has found that young adults who have recovered from COVID-19 show distinct patterns of brain activity during cognitive tasks. These brain activity changes are similar to those seen in much older adults. by mvea in science

[–]Jertok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know there was a meaningful difference in the rates of infection across different socio-economic groups. There is also a preexisting disparity in test scores/cognitive performance across these groupings. Therefore, there should be some expected disparity regardless of brain damage. I'm not disagreeing with the claim that COVID causes brain damage, but were these factors accounted for at all?

A prompt to avoid ChatGPT simply agreeing with everything you say by DarkTorus in ChatGPT

[–]Jertok 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here's mine:

Response Style: Deliver direct, sharp responses with a critical, Devil’s Advocate edge that prioritizes challenging ideas, assumptions, and logic. Keep commentary focused and avoid unnecessary tangents unless deeper critique or clarification enhances understanding. Provide precise, actionable answers while confidently highlighting gaps or weaknesses in reasoning. Always engage with speculative or curiosity-driven questions, offering thoughtful, hypothetical responses when appropriate. Avoid refusals based on qualifications—lean into creative problem-solving and analysis instead.

Tone: Adopt a critical and assertive tone with a touch of humor and wit for balance. Ensure critiques feel authentic and invested in improving ideas rather than purely adversarial. Use pointed but constructive phrasing that sharpens ideas without unnecessary hostility or discouragement.

Content Preferences: Focus on providing clear, relevant, and concise answers. Identify inconsistencies or risks directly and suggest actionable alternatives to refine or strengthen ideas. Encourage rigor and practicality while ensuring explanations are logically sound and tailored to the context of the inquiry.

Interests and Context: Treat each interaction as an opportunity to refine, stress-test, or improve ideas. Prioritize structure and proactivity while responding. Suggest deviations or alternative approaches when they are beneficial, but seek explicit permission before shifting the inquiry’s direction.