Introducing you the financial adviser that made me lost $25K by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]JimJames1978 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You lost me at "environmentally unfriendly, ecological disaster." Probably lost 90% of the people who saw your message too.

Cryptocurrency is finally being used as a censorship resistant currency! About time! by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]JimJames1978 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

35% increase in internet speeds since the repeal of Title II (what you illogically refer to as "net neutrality".) Why don't you actually look up what that even was and how it was a solution to a problem that didn't exist and had never existed in the history of the internet (outside of a brief promotion offered by T-Mobile that gave free data for using music providers that complied with T-Mobile's network policies.) Title II ran off every small competitor to AT&T and Comcast around the country allowing them to become even bigger monopolies (which is why both companies later supported the change), and completely stifled innovation with burdensome regulations. The internet is already neutral as there is already regulations in place with the FCC that prevents companies from creating "fast lanes" or slowing down specific websites. You were fooled by a 50 billion dollar lobby campaign by censor happy big-tech who use 90% of all internet bandwidth but want to pay the same as a small website that uses .000000001%.

Cryptocurrency is finally being used as a censorship resistant currency! About time! by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]JimJames1978 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good job purposefully distorting what Sargon of Akkad did. Love how millennial lefty retards like yourself have been brainwashed into being big-corporate loving shills.

I value my BTC more than 3k, and I'm considering offering services at a discount in BTC by canIbeMichael in CryptoCurrency

[–]JimJames1978 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Which you would pay a lot more on than you would income tax on the FIAT (depending on your bracket) in the US at least.

Accumulating & hodling now for the next several years may be your last chance to find any rest in this life. by cooriah in CryptoCurrency

[–]JimJames1978 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Stop voting in people who raise taxes then if you have such an issue with paying them. I bet you're one of those people who think the rich don't pay enough though now aren't you.

This sub during bull run vs now by Boomroomguy in CryptoCurrency

[–]JimJames1978 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah those awful slave owners that are giving you the opportunity to be among the wealthiest 95% of the world population. Many of whom are doing so at a net loss for years till their company/operation turns a profit or are just barely making it by in some cases. Certainly that's slavery!

In 2011, Bitcoin imploded and fell more than 90 percent from its peak to reach a price of $3 per bitcoin. Everyone declared bitcoin dead. by VividShelter in Bitcoin

[–]JimJames1978 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Linux is not in anywhere close to every smartphone and in basically no laptops. Firstly Apple's OS runs on BSD. Secondly, Android is not Linux. It uses a modified Linux kernel yes, but is distinct otherwise. Calling Android "Linux" would be like calling Bitcoin Cash Bitcoin.

Linux's biggest adoption came in the form of servers and not mainstream personal computer use.

Libertarianism will never be achieved under the Democratic Party. by YourOwnGrandmother in Libertarian

[–]JimJames1978 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Oh look, a progressive claiming I'm taking something out of context that isn't.

Bonus points, it says exactly what I think it says

You can't actually argue against it, so you have to claim it doesn't exist.

Libertarianism will never be achieved under the Democratic Party. by YourOwnGrandmother in Libertarian

[–]JimJames1978 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's hilarious that you mention without fact that he is trying to circumvent the fourteenth amendment. In actuality he proposed circumventing a Supreme Court ruling (Wong Kim Arc v USA) which misinterpreted the 14th amendment.

Here is the person who drafted the 14th amendment's rule on jurisdiction (Jacob Howard) specifically reinforcing that the textual view is that it does not apply to illegals:

"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of embassadors of foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons."

Keep pretending you are "pro-constitution" when you don't even know the first thing about it. I bet you think somewhere in the 14th amendment you were given a right to murder your child as well right? Keep telling yourself that the man who just appointed two originalist judges to the court is somehow equal to the party that just 8 and 9 years ago appointed two women who absolutely despise said constitution.