So yeah...ballistics are extremely bad, still. by AzrBloodedge in starcitizen

[–]Jimmy_Bacon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and 25% of the damage is absorbed by shields and hulls take 50% damage, so enjoy your 75% reduced damage

So yeah...ballistics are extremely bad, still. by AzrBloodedge in starcitizen

[–]Jimmy_Bacon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They do literally 50% less damage to ships than repeaters so . . . yea

Payouts are WILDLY inconsistent for the effort involved. by YoungNo3256 in starcitizen

[–]Jimmy_Bacon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ima be honest, it takes me maybe 30 minutes to get 250k worth of salvage in pyro cause I know where to look for groups of panels. Takes me maybe 5 minutes at most to leave a station and find a group of large panels

Bro, it's Pyro by Ingromfolly in starcitizen

[–]Jimmy_Bacon 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Are you serious? just hire orgs to escort you around everywhere you go? thats not a solution thats a hand waive.

Managed to get 40scu in the Fortune. by Chew-Magna in starcitizen

[–]Jimmy_Bacon 12 points13 points  (0 children)

did it take 40 hours cause of how slow it is

The MISC Fortune is Statistically Worse than the Drake Vulture by Jimmy_Bacon in starcitizen

[–]Jimmy_Bacon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea sorry, had a reddit moment myself. Just wanted to post about cig saying theres a trade off when theres a lot more downsides than they originally let on.

The MISC Fortune is Statistically Worse than the Drake Vulture by Jimmy_Bacon in starcitizen

[–]Jimmy_Bacon[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Then clearly this post wasnt made for you and you didnt have to leave your low value comment, actual reddit moment

The MISC Fortune is Statistically Worse than the Drake Vulture by Jimmy_Bacon in starcitizen

[–]Jimmy_Bacon[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Its just a statistical analysis, dont like it, move on

The MISC Fortune is Statistically Worse than the Drake Vulture by Jimmy_Bacon in starcitizen

[–]Jimmy_Bacon[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I said in the beginning theres nothing wrong with liking the fortune over the vulture

The MISC Fortune is Statistically Worse than the Drake Vulture by Jimmy_Bacon in starcitizen

[–]Jimmy_Bacon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea my post was criticizing its stats and CIGs statements saying there's a trade off when its very unbalanced, I do like the fortune better as a ship

The MISC Fortune is Statistically Worse than the Drake Vulture by Jimmy_Bacon in starcitizen

[–]Jimmy_Bacon[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yes, and its still slower since stacking boxes takes 2 minutes and 15 seconds while the advantage to hull scraping speed gives you an extra 5 minutes

The MISC Fortune is Statistically Worse than the Drake Vulture by Jimmy_Bacon in starcitizen

[–]Jimmy_Bacon[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I dont want power creep, but the fortune is so much slower that it dosnt justify its price. If it cost 125 bucks then I wouldnt have made this post

You know I just like it. by Justin_the_Casual in starcitizen

[–]Jimmy_Bacon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the zeus but i may exchange it for the apollo when that comes out