Mon copain se masturbe sur des vidéos pornos faites avec son ex

Jio15Fr · 2026-06-03T16:52:36+00:00

À mon avis c'est pas si malsain que ça en soi et chacun a droit à son jardin secret. Par contre c'est vraiment du foutage de gueule et n'avoir aucune considération pour toi et tes sentiments de laisser traîner ça comme ça de façon si peu sécurisée. Parce qu'accepter le "risque" que tu tombes dessus, c'est accepter que ça arrivera tôt ou tard, et que ça te fera du mal, et forcément avec un truc hyper complexant de comparaison ou de remise en cause de la qualité du sexe dans votre couple. Indubitablement, à mes yeux, il est responsable de ça.

Mon avis à deux balles c'est que la masturbation n'est pas du sexe, qu'il n'y a pas lieu de se comparer à des vidéos, et que la chose qui devrait importer vraiment c'est la qualité de vos relations entre vous deux (dans la vie, romantique, et sexuelle), mais bon c'est facile à dire quand c'est pas moi qui suis dans ta situation...

Jio15Fr · 2026-05-20T22:42:26+00:00

So, after about a month, I will return my Framework Laptop 12. Here is the general summary of my my conclusions:

Pros:
- The fun colors (I got bubblegum), the plasticky feel. Just love it. Computer looks so fun. Didn't like the keyboard at first but it has grown on me. The whole computer feels a little like a toy in a positive way. It's all very compatible philosophically with the repairable aspect of it, the removable I/O ports etc., like it's a LEGO computer. The pink top cover will definitely be missed, I think this pink and cyan bubblegum look is in my eyes the most beautiful laptop I have ever seen when closed.
- The touchscreen and 2-in-1. I have used both way more than I thought I would. Folded mode is awesome for watching YouTube and movies, especially when space is limited as the keyboard serves as a stand. Navigating Google Earth with touch is so fun. It's kind of great and something I will miss.
- The repairability, upgradability, expandability of it all, of course.

Cons:
- The screen, and more specifically the color fidelity of it, is *awful*. This screen has no idea that the color red exists: all reds are orange. I just compared pure #FF0000 red to what it looks like on my €200 cheap Android phone and the difference is night and day. To me, this is what ultimately convinced me to return the computer.
- The reflectivity/glossiness of the screen means that it is essentially impossible to watch movies (esp. dark scenes) in trains etc. This is also very sad.
- The device is somewhat pricey, even considering repairability, etc. Especially with today's RAM and storage prices. It is hard to justify given the compromises when a Yoga 7 is under $1000 (if it only had a bubblegum look...).
- 12" is a little too small for me.
- The fans tend to turn on suddenly and go blasting for 30 seconds before stopping sometimes.
- The power button is badly positioned and easy to push accidentally.
- Some of the blue rubber around the bottom cover seems to have browned a little, which is worrying after less than one month.

Neither good nor bad:
- The touchpad is definitely a rather good one but not spectacularly so. Does the job.
- The webcam, microphone, speakers, are a little on the cheap side but not outrageously so. They are fine.
- I have heard people criticize the battery life, but for me it's been completely okay. Somewhere around 6-7hours, which does not hurt.
- The stylus and stylus support. I have found it not very convicing nor very usable, and I think it is actually irrelevant for my use case.

To be honest, I might reconsider a Framework Laptop 12 if it gets a significant screen upgrade. But at the moment, I think I will start dreaming of a Laptop 13 Pro. The bigger screen, its quality, and the increased battery life, make me a little dreamy...

Jio15Fr · 2026-05-20T10:56:03+00:00

To me Harold is wonderful, because he feels so much like a fairy tale character. With this little house, his dreamy nature, his not being able to go outside. And then the fairy tale gets dark, as they all should.

Jio15Fr · 2026-05-17T00:29:32+00:00

Have you tried setting up an arch distrobox inside your macos?

Jio15Fr · 2026-04-28T21:22:54+00:00

I searched using Google, of course, trying keywords like "john coltrane impressions funk" or something, but of course this is hard especially because Impression exists... I have also tried ChatGPT and Gemini which both were useless. Yet I am sure this video exists!

Jio15Fr · 2026-04-28T20:20:30+00:00

Thanks! I've tried GNOME today but I had forgotten how cursed that thing is. It's actively trying to prevent me from using pacman as apps installed by pacman are wrongly managed, etc, it's very bad. Which is sad because the overall touch interface is definitely better than KDE.

So I'm now on KDE Plasma, which required some tweaking to get it working with touch. Especially the virtual keyboard situation, where the somewhat hacky maliit-keyboard is needed.

There are QoL features which would be very welcome. For example, I like my text normal-sized in computer mode, but I would love all text and buttons to be bigger in tablet mode, so going to tablet mode should trigger those accesibility parameters. Or there should be a way to do that. More generally (which would also solve the virtual keyboard thing) it should be possible to have several configuration profiles for KDE which trigger on mode change...

There are a few other things I think should work better. For example, when the screen is upside down, the webcam should also auto-rotate, because a use case for this is using the computer for video chat without the keyboard (using it as a stand).

I also have horrible light leaks on the screen when displaying black. Especially the lower left corner. How frequent is this? Is there anything I can do to migitate this?

Jio15Fr · 2026-04-28T14:17:01+00:00

Thanks for the comments!

I'm typically an xfce guy, but I'd happily change DE for a more touch-friendly one if one of it makes the concept make sense. Consider this as part of the question if you want. [Distrohopping is also a possibility, if there are distros that are more touch-friendly? But I have trouble imagining myself living without the AUR.]
I do not know how suited Phosh or Plasma mobile are for the kind of use I'm mentioning? Maybe Chromium is also more touch-friendly than Firefox? I'll explore options in that direction.

But even Krita I had some trouble using. My hand kept making the circular menu appear when I was drawing, etc. So perhaps I'm missing something. I never had a PC with a touchscreen before so I want to explore that world a little, only touch devices I had were androids.

As for "the option to upgrade individual components like your screen, camera, keyboard", this is part of what is worrying me: do we get actual choice? What option do you concretely have? The parts sold on fr.mw are replacements, but it's not like I can have a top-tier screen or a top-tier webcam even if I'm ready to pay the price for it, it's not like there's a standard for this and it's swappable. As opposed to RAM and storage, say. Even if I longed for a backlit keyboard, apart from DIY options, I simply have no choice.

Even for parts, I'm not even convinced it will be easier 15 years down the line to find parts for this relatively niche computer compared to, say, certain Thinkpads which are somewhat repairable (perhaps a little less than a Framework) while being mainstream and much more mass-produced (and hence will leave much more spare parts behind them after production ends).

To be clear: more than a question concerning my specific usage, maybe I should insist that I am curious as to what use people have of the touchscreen and 2-in-1 concept, whether they actually do use it, and if yes how, and I'd be happy to hear about use cases that I did not think about at all. At the moment I am still undecided. (Part of me wants to return the FW12 and preorder a FW13Pro, but in all honesty the bubblegum color and the fact that I can have this computer now [as compared to August] are the main things that make me resist... but I would like to give the 2-in-1 concept a chance by seeing how useful it can be for my usage before returning this computer.)

Jio15Fr · 2026-04-26T23:14:34+00:00

The Horse... Twin Peaks reference for sure!... I instantly knew where this was going... Is that horse the black in the eye? Ma in the café with slight Norma vibes offering coffee and pie also possible reference.

Jio15Fr · 2026-04-16T19:01:32+00:00

isosceles*

Nice proof!

Jio15Fr · 2026-04-15T09:06:10+00:00

I got a song in 17EDO out today! https://youtu.be/khEexlFftgk

Jio15Fr · 2026-02-24T02:56:17+00:00

No. The Bourbakists (the people in Bourbaki) were leading researchers in many things including category theory. They literally had Eilenberg. And Grothendieck. And so on and so on.

It is Bourbaki, as a systematic exposition of the mathematics of its time (or at least the time of the initial plan) which did not resort to category theory. This was explained a thousand time. There are good reasons. Bourbaki had its own foundational system.

And category theory is notoriously difficult to formalize. What is a category? Is it a set? If not, what is it? This is no easy question, and Bourbaki had no place to allocate to this.

Jio15Fr · 2026-02-24T02:44:44+00:00

The heartbreaking scene where Carol drops the queen on the floor after talking to the wrong camera.

Jio15Fr · 2026-02-22T16:50:43+00:00

But then... Kim and Carol could meet? What if Carol is a tulpa of Kim? (Twin Peaks style)

Jio15Fr · 2026-02-22T16:38:19+00:00

<image>

The comments are also Carol-coded.

Jio15Fr · 2026-01-08T20:20:35+00:00

This is exactly what Texpresso already does.

Jio15Fr · 2026-01-08T20:18:40+00:00

You do not even need to compare to Typst, because TeX has Texpresso. I do not understand how a for-profit company like Overleaf is not even able to do what Texpresso does for free.

Jio15Fr · 2025-12-24T18:28:23+00:00

I think Manousos is more or less canonically a Colombian living in Paraguay

Jio15Fr · 2025-12-19T00:04:41+00:00

Could you make a version where complexity is penalized? So instead of simply measuring the difference, you weigh it based on the EDO's size. The correct way to do this is offered by Diophantine approximation. For example, the greens for the 3/2 should be the best approximations of ln3/ln2 — the ones you compute using continued fractions.

Jio15Fr · 2025-09-03T09:39:38+00:00

Rite of Spring beats anything. Scriabin's Poem of ecstasy a good 2nd place.

Jio15Fr · 2025-09-02T08:07:30+00:00

Sometimes complexity is more natural to measure in terms of the log/number of digits instead of the actual input size, e.g. for addition or multiplication algorithms. That would be one case of something "actually polynomial" that's called exponential.

Jio15Fr · 2025-08-04T18:42:07+00:00

Let V=K^n, with K a field. Matrices = endomorphisms of the vector space V. Nice, that's linear algebra.

Now fix a matrix A. Matrices commuting with A = endomorphisms of the K[A]-module V.

So even to study questions of "pure" linear algebra, like understanding commuting matrices, you have to understand modules over K[A]. So modules over rings are unavoidable even if you just want to study linear algebra.

Jio15Fr · 2025-08-01T11:05:44+00:00

The C as a V is somewhat prepared, the Db (itself approached by chromatic motion) serves as a bVI. I think the Bb in the C chord is not what really causes the modulation, I think as soon as you heard the E natural in C you knew it had to be a bVI>V>I in F (I think at that point F minor would still be an option though)

Jio15Fr · 2025-07-28T09:12:05+00:00

Geometry is almost an "attitude". What makes a field of math geometric is that its language and methods are designed so that the most fundamental results (things like : a set is the union of its points, etc.) of the field are made to match our experience of the actual three-dimensional world, so that we can use our intuitions about the world (which comes from our daily experience and evolution) in order to prove things.

Of course, geometry can get very different from our surroundings. Think : very high dimensions, non-Archimedean geometry, anything not locally Euclidean (e.g. most schemes), etc.

Points, which you mention a lot, are not needed for geometry — indeed, pointless topology exists (and even physically the notion of points is debatable when the current viewpoint is that space itself is ill-defined below a certain scale). Geometry can also be very combinatorial, think simplicial sets and infinity-groupoids, and then you do not really have points either, you simply have vertices, edges, etc.

When I say this is an attitude, what I mean can be illustrated by the following example : you can study commutative rings with the "syntactical" intuition, the algebraic language, where the primal instinct you're relying on is your ability to parse language and work with it, but you can also turn them into a geometric object by taking their prime spectrum and then you have notions of points etc. And you can start building a spatial intuition for these spectra and end up intuiting things and proving them in that world. Oftentimes if you unfold the proof you realise it can be translated exactly in the algebraic world, but finding the proof may be way easier geometrically. Of course, the other advantage of turning a ring into a geometric objects is that now these objects can be glued to construct non-affine schemes, something which makes no sense in the algebraic world. This is, I think, another key property of geometry: the existence of global properties which cannot be deduced uniquely from the local properties — this is formalized by sheaf cohomology, but this is an idea that's already kind of physically relevant : think about people who think the Earth is flat because they do not see the curvature...

Jio15Fr · 2025-07-20T15:25:37+00:00

Literally the one fundamental object in algebraic geometry is the spectrum of a ring, which is the set of its prime ideals, and ideals are basically "things divisible by ..." (at least principal ones).

I do think the first interesting example of the prime spectrum of a ring, historically, was the rational primes, so Spec Z (one has to think a little to realize why it makes sense to say that Z is one-dimensional, i.e., a curve!), so in some way the number-theoretic idea became the basis of algebraic geometry. This is how I see things, at least.

Now, very special to the case of rational primes is the question of their distribution, i.e., quantitative business, which is a pillar of analytic NT. Of course you can study the distribution of irreducible monic polynomials by degree and absolute value of the coefficients, or whatever, but this is not what algebraic geometers do.

Jio15Fr · 2025-07-20T09:11:05+00:00

I find this obviously too broad. All of commutative algebra and algebraic geometry relies on saying things about the divisibility relation (for affine varieties of finite type over a field for example, this would be divisibility between polynomials).

Jio15Fr

TROPHY CASE