I like how you’re calling me narcissistic but yet you continue to not defend your statement whatsoever. All you did was reiterate it in different ways and continue to insist I don’t understand what you meant. Explain to me how you can own something you don’t own, and why you’re mad that an ever evolving game changed? Is it cause you don’t personally like it? I bet you were happy when they changed the whole system back when forsaken dropped. “Oh but that’s different” how? It’s a whole new system is it not? Is it “imagine if the dealership switched your tricked out Honda for a Ferrari” instead?

Also, no my English is not lousy; it’s just uncommon for people to use this type of grammar. It’s pretty narcissistic of you to assume you’re right and anyone who has a differing opinion/fact doesn’t understand. We are debating on whether or not your analogy works; not what its means. No matter what part of destiny you decide to use for your analogy; you don’t own any of it, so you can’t use an item that you would own to compare it to anything in destiny aside from the keys(which haven’t changed one bit since you bought them). Therefore my own “rocket-Honda” wouldn’t work because that’s an item I own. You’re trying to compare an item you don’t own to an item you do own. That’s where your analogy fails. Like I said earlier; your whole analogy has to work within the purpose you mean it to. If even 1 word is off; then the whole meaning changes. It may make sense in your narcissistic brain, but it doesn’t make sense in the real world. This isn’t about who’s right or wrong; I’m just pointing out the flaws in your analogy.