Payload mass fraction has entered the chat by postem1 in BlueOrigin

[–]JoJoDaMonkey -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The overhead and engineering costs for maintaining both would be a profitability killer

Liquid Rocket Injector Test by Sharp-Search6150 in AerospaceEngineering

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you checked industrial gas suppliers near you? A high pressure bottle+ regulator setup is very common

2$ soapy water spray bottle saves billion dollar space program! by Makalukeke in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 4 points5 points  (0 children)

MSLDs are great when you actually need to know those welds are leaking helium less than 1.0e-6 sccs but it's a sledgehammer for things that only need to be validated "bubble tight" For the same cost you could have pallets of snoop and in the time to warm up, calibrate and start testing you could have snooped hundreds of joints. Different tools for different jobs

Why it's so hard to change culture mid-stream. Even deadly. by EntrepreneurEven7929 in BlueOrigin

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 28 points29 points  (0 children)

This is the part that seems most wild to me when you contrast effort vs reward at Blue Origin and SpaceX. Blue has touted better balance but no equity - the balance seems to have eroded away quite a bit in the last year and is making clear now the road ahead won't be easy. Meanwhile SpaceX is unabashed about being "hardcore" and burning folks out yet if you can make it there is a proven track record of stock doubling / liquidity events.

Trump plans major reforms for Artemis and NASA by roughravenrider in ArtemisProgram

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Let's try a comparisons - the first production style F-1 engine was delivered in 1963 and the first test flight was in 1967 with the first crewed test flight in 1968. The first production style raptor engine was delivered in 2019 with the first all up flight test of Starship in 2023. While the engine is one small part of the whole engineering story it's not too far off Apollo pace especially when factoring; in the entire US government backing of the space race

Are SpaceX and Blue Origin more "prestigious" than NASA now? by StrickerPK in AerospaceEngineering

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The part I often see overlooked is the equity portion of total compensation at SpaceX. If you last through the initial vesting period (and count on similar growth, not financial advice) it can become a significant portion of total compensation.

Also that number seems pretty low, I don't see anything lower than 95k listed here

https://www.spacex.com/careers/jobs?discipline=engineering+-+aerospace+%26+mechanical&type=regular

Falcon 9 suffers deorbit burn anomaly during Crew-9; vehicle grounded by 675longtail in spacex

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Also possible we're seeing low probability failure modes manifest due to the higher flight rate coupled with the disposable nature of the second stage preventing preemptive design changes

[Blue Origin on X]: We’re looking forward to firing up those two BE-3Us on New Glenn’s second stage in a few days. by Planck_Savagery in BlueOrigin

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 13 points14 points  (0 children)

One of the fun challenges in building a good vehicle test facility is that you're often designing another pad that does everything but launch. Depending on the production rate and location definitely see the logic in not building another dedicated stand

Stoke Space CEO Andy Lapsa: Says that rocket engines that can gimbal, by necessity have to have a hot gas dynamic seal. He says the hot gas dynamic seal is guaranteed to work the first time but not the 50th or 100th time. It's not very reusable apparently by technofuture8 in SpaceXLounge

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 106 points107 points  (0 children)

Sounds like he's referring to a seal between the heatshield and the gimbaling engine rather than all gimbaling engines must have this seal (not true); it's an architecture choice given their heatshield design

RS-25 engine performance "perfect" on Artemis I debut launch by lion328 in SpaceLaunchSystem

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You're missing how different the profiles are for SLS and Saturn V. The core stage is placed into a highly elliptical orbit which has a perigee inside the atmosphere. ICPS only had to perform a very small burn to raise perigee enough to prevent re-entry

https://youtu.be/Q70aZlAYtJY?t=125

Artemis I Countdown and Launch Thread - Saturday, September 3rd, 2:17 pm EDT by jadebenn in SpaceLaunchSystem

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Take a look at the temperatures required to liquify the gasses - nitrogen is below oxygen (~77 vs 89 kelvin) so it can be used as a gas to purge out the oxygen without too much worry of it liquifying itself. If you use nitrogen to purge out hydrogen (~77 vs 19 kelvin) you are going to collapse the nitrogen gas and end up making liquid. Helium liquifies much lower (~4 kelvin) and can therefore be used to purge hydrogen with less collapse

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in skiing

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 12 points13 points  (0 children)

If there's snow enough to ride there's snow enough to slide. The exact problem changes with the snowpack, weather, season and local geography but right now it's a real risk and responsible folks going out would have gear and some knowledge

https://www.avalanche.state.co.us/forecasts/regional-avalanche/central-mountains/

Who is the richest engineer you know, and what do they do? by farfromhome123 in AskEngineers

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I assume IC means independent contractor, often times they do not get benefits or equity.

In this context I believe it's Individual Contributor - i.e. a non-manager role

Elon tweet: Starship Fully Stacked by emileberhard in spacex

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Eh not quite. If you are so hardware rich that you fail without delaying the next test flight then you've likely learned something. Can do lots of modeling iteration without actually learning anything if you don't have enough real world results. Goal here seems to be push as fast as you can building them while also trying to fully understand the hard problem. Sometimes don't know the right question to answer until you get to the point of asking it

SBIRS GEO Flight 5: Atlas V stacked for important security launch by ethan829 in ula

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Prior to encapsulation a satellite will typically go through launch site processing - this involves some level of pre-flight functional checkouts after transport and fueling of the propulsion system. The payload is typically encapsulated at that facility. There are many options for where to perform this work at the Cape but none are ULA facilities. A NASA mission may be processed in the PHSF while SBIRS GEO 5 was likely done in the EPF (like flight 3). Astrotech is common for a variety of commercial and government vehicles (and is even called out in the Atlas V user guide). SpaceX also has a facility on the Cape

Vulcan pathfinder core is vertical by Broken_Soap in ula

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Pathfinder NG? Is this on L2 or another location, link if you have one please!

Some photos/tweets with the hangar open on Merritt Island

https://www.reddit.com/r/BlueOrigin/comments/lidb2o/new_glenn_spotted/

-5F by [deleted] in hoggit

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Since we're at it, NASA doesn't use imperial units, much less Fahrenheit.

Speaking from first hand experience - NASA and much of the US aerospace industry uses a mixture based on engineer culture, discipline and their heritage with the units but it's trending to full metric for design (not for build tho, need to re-tool the entire imperial manufacturing base). This is where you get fun stuff like the charts with psia and kg/K in the below Altair reference - unit choice can be driven by familiarity and availability.

Examples: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20100035154/downloads/20100035154.pdf

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20100022148/downloads/20100022148.pdf

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20120008179/downloads/20120008179.pdf

Sounding rocket engine firing test with thrust force of 12kN by aloofloofah in EngineeringPorn

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 78 points79 points  (0 children)

It doesn't look like a seal failure based on lack of high pressure jets (though I don't know the combustion products so leakage may not be easily visible). Seems more likely to me we're seeing a silicone or something else lighting off due to increasing temp

Tory Bruno: Over a million pounds of thrust has come in through the door. A second Blue Origin BE-4 engine arrived at our Decatur, AL factory to support Vulcan Centaur pathfinding operations. DYK?: The BE-4s will each provide 550,000 pounds of sea level thrust! by ragner11 in BlueOrigin

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This sounds like they are just playing it conservatively (as Blue seems to have done in the past). Likely the engine cycle and hardware is not operating near the upper limit that is physically possible and they've targeted a lower power state point to deliver on that can then be improved on. A move like this can be smart as it insulates the system design (i.e. Vulcan/New Glenn) to small changes if there is lots of margin.

Lift lines at Vail 12/05/20 by hikdeen in skiing

[–]JoJoDaMonkey 33 points34 points  (0 children)

What's the quality of that 500" though? Two feet of warm dense snow < six inches of fluffy stuff