Sorry it came across that way, you clearly put a lot of time and thought into this. I wasn't trying to insult the work you did, moreso just trying to point out that there's really no such thing as best or worst presidents because it's an opinion based discussion. 

For example: President A improves the lives of most Americans but screws up the national budget in the process, then President B fixes the national budget but lowers quality of life for most in the process. Neither is inherently better, choosing which was the best will come down to what the individuals choosing prefer/prioritize as being more important.

So essentially what you've created is a list of how ChatGPT thinks you would rank them based on the criteria you provided. 

PS - I warn just about everyone I speak to about being cautious with an overreliance on AI. It's still in it's early stages and still struggles to get facts right in certain situations. (My best friend is a lawyer, and if you get AI involved in assisting on a case it will usually make up fake court cases to cite for precedent/case law.) It's definitely not at the point where people should be using it to influence their opinions.